Monday, August 25, 2014

A call to war?

 Ronald S. Lauder emphasis a point to Jorge Mario Bergoglio in 2008.

One of Francis' Talmudic buddies and president of the World Jewish Congress, Ronald S. Lauder, writes an op-ed for The New York Times, Who Will Stand Up for the Christians?  While it is a valid question, we here at Call Me Jorge... smell something rotten.  Forgive us, but every time someone from the WJC says or writes something it is to further their own Talmudic world agenda.  Is this a clarion call for the West to fight another war on behalf of Israel?



Who Will Stand Up for the Christians?
by Ronald S. Lauder

WHY is the world silent while Christians are being slaughtered in the Middle East and Africa? In Europe and in the United States, we have witnessed demonstrations over the tragic deaths of Palestinians who have been used as human shields by Hamas, the terrorist organization that controls Gaza. The United Nations has held inquiries and focuses its anger on Israel for defending itself against that same terrorist organization. But the barbarous slaughter of thousands upon thousands of Christians is met with relative indifference. 

The Middle East and parts of central Africa are losing entire Christian communities that have lived in peace for centuries. The terrorist group Boko Haram has kidnapped and killed hundreds of Christians this year — ravaging the predominantly Christian town of Gwoza, in Borno State in northeastern Nigeria, two weeks ago. Half a million Christian Arabs have been driven out of Syria during the three-plus years of civil war there. Christians have been persecuted and killed in countries from Lebanon to Sudan. 

Historians may look back at this period and wonder if people had lost their bearings. Few reporters have traveled to Iraq to bear witness to the Nazi-like wave of terror that is rolling across that country. The United Nations has been mostly mum. World leaders seem to be consumed with other matters in this strange summer of 2014. There are no flotillas traveling to Syria or Iraq. And the beautiful celebrities and aging rock stars — why doesn’t the slaughter of Christians seem to activate their social antennas?

President Obama should be commended for ordering airstrikes to save tens of thousands of Yazidis, who follow an ancient religion and have been stranded on a mountain in northern Iraq, besieged by Sunni Muslim militants. But sadly, airstrikes alone are not enough to stop this grotesque wave of terrorism.

The Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) is not a loose coalition of jihadist groups, but a real military force that has managed to take over much of Iraq with a successful business model that rivals its coldblooded spearhead of death. It uses money from banks and gold shops it has captured, along with control of oil resources and old-fashioned extortion, to finance its killing machine, making it perhaps the wealthiest Islamist terrorist group in the world. But where it truly excels is in its carnage, rivaling the death orgies of the Middle Ages. It has ruthlessly targeted Shiites, Kurds and Christians. 

“They actually beheaded children and put their heads on a stick” a Chaldean-American businessman named Mark Arabo told CNN, describing a scene in a Mosul park. “More children are getting beheaded, mothers are getting raped and killed, and fathers are being hung.”

This week, 200,000 Aramaeans fled their ancestral homeland around Nineveh, having already escaped Mosul.

The general indifference to ISIS, with its mass executions of Christians and its deadly preoccupation with Israel, isn’t just wrong; it’s obscene.
In a speech before thousands of Christians in Budapest in June, I made a solemn promise that just as I will not be silent in the face of the growing threat of anti-Semitism in Europe and in the Middle East, I will not be indifferent to Christian suffering. Historically, it has almost always been the other way around: Jews have all too often been the persecuted minority. But Israel has been among the first countries to aid Christians in South Sudan. Christians can openly practice their religion in Israel, unlike in much of the Middle East.

This bond between Jews and Christians makes complete sense. We share much more than most religions. We read the same Bible, and share a moral and ethical core. Now, sadly, we share a kind of suffering: Christians are dying because of their beliefs, because they are defenseless and because the world is indifferent to their suffering.

Good people must join together and stop this revolting wave of violence. It’s not as if we are powerless. I write this as a citizen of the strongest military power on earth. I write this as a Jewish leader who cares about my Christian brothers and sisters.

The Jewish people understand all too well what can happen when the world is silent. This campaign of death must be stopped.
 Occult artwork which appeared with the above op-ed in the New York Times.


Related:

7 comments:

  1. Doesn't Jorge know that all this Islamic "fundamentalism" came into being only after the creation of "Israel" and that without such Islamic "fundamentalism" Counterfeit Israel wll have a tougher job existing?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hello CMJ. Timing is everything. As I attempt to point out in my article which you linked to above about "how to destroy a country". (Many thanks for the link.)

    To call for a military strike now -- after the Christians have been displaced and their churches destroyed -- is of little to no benefit. This is way beyond cynical. This is way beyond manipulative. I think this is even way beyond diabolical.

    This is the stuff of the anti-Christ.... and this man is one of bergoglio's "friends"....

    + + +

    God have mercy on our souls.

    Holy Mary, Mother of God, pray for us.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Christians and Palestinians have a lot in common these days ,both groups getting slaughtered in the Middle East.

    ReplyDelete
  4. “I will bless them that bless thee, and curse them that curse thee, and in thee shall all the kindred of the earth be blessed” Genesis 12:3
    http://www.drbo.org/chapter/01012.htm

    God made this covenant with Abram when he was a Gentile. There is more than one "Old" Covenant. In this context the Mosaic and Abrahamic Covenants are most germane. Judaizers intentionally conflate these Covenants to sow confusion among the faithful and to appear to elevate the synagogue's damned position.

    The Abrahamic Covenant was with Abram the Gentile and was a Covenant with him and his spiritual descendants. The synagogue of Satan feigns a carnal connection to Abraham, but Jesus damned that claim:

    "And think not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham for our father. For I tell you that God is able of these stones to raise up children to Abraham." Matthew 3:9

    As you'd expect, the science and genealogy corroborate what Jesus said. The Ashkenazim's origins in European Khazaria also makes the synagogue's carnal "Abraham" claim laughable.

    Who cares? Notwithstanding their Master Race creed, there is no racial back door to Heaven and no racial chute to Hell.

    Notwithstanding perverted exegesis by Protestant dispensationalists and Zionists, God was not speaking to or about Jewish people because there was no Jewish nation—Abram, not yet Abraham, was still a Gentile and God was speaking to Abram alone.

    St. Paul affirms in Galatians 3:6-8 that God’s covenant with Abram, later Abraham, was made to him as a Gentile:

    “As it is written: Abraham believed God, and it was reputed to him unto justice. Know ye therefore, that they who are of faith, the same are the children of Abraham. And the scripture, foreseeing, that God justifieth the Gentiles by faith, told unto Abraham before: In thee shall all nations be blessed.”
    http://www.drbo.org/chapter/55003.htm

    St. Paul further elaborates on the justification of and covenant with Abraham before he was a Jew in Romans chapter 4. http://www.drbo.org/chapter/52004.htm

    Why weren’t the Pharisees in the lineage of Abraham? (Matthew 3:9) Why did Moses ‘accuse” them? (John 5:45-47) Only faithful Israelites followed the law of God. Contrary to the claims of Judaizers, the Pharisees did not have "the moral law of God." Instead, Jesus said that the Pharisees “voided the commandment of God for their own traditions.” (Mark 7:9) The Pharisees boast that theirs is not a biblical religion, but one of their own making. The majority of both the Old and New Testaments tells of the defection of the Israelites and Pharisees. It is true Christians who are the true Jews, the true New Israel, the true lineage of Abraham and Moses, the ones who are “blessed” in Abraham’s lineage. (1 Peter 2 2:9-10; Galatians 3:6-8, and Romans chapter 4) It is by their fruits of war, genocide, usury, fractional reserve banking, swindling, and other crimes against humanity that you know the Zionists.

    It is true Christians who are today's trueJews, the true New Israel, the true lineage of Abraham and Moses, the ones who are “blessed” in Abraham’s lineage in the Faith, the people of the New Covenant promised in Jeremias 31:31-32. (see also: 1 Peter 2 2:9-10; Galatians 3:6-8, and Romans chapter 4) As St. Paul explained, the Abrahamic and Mosaic Covenants are fulfilled in those in the Faith, not by those who reject the Faith, who connived the judicial murder of their Redeemer, who called His Blood down on themselves and their generations, who blaspheme Him today. (Galatians 3:6-8 and Romans Chapter 4, Matthew 27:25) DNA—whether real or phony— has NOTHING to do with God’s blessings today. See Apocalypse 2:9 and 3:9 to understand who makes false claims to be God’s People.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you Mark Smith for your helpful explanation. Fr. E Sylvester Berry says in his 1921 Apocalypse of St. John that only faithful Catholics have the 'right' to call themselves Jews - as you point out - for the true Jew is the one who follows THEIR Messiah, who is Jesus Christ. These phoney ones do NOT and the phoney "popes" who tell them that Jesus isn't their Messiah when He clearly IS the promised Messiah - rather endorse the Antichrist - are also not.

      Delete
  5. Lauder and all his co-religionists make me want to wretch. He doesn't give one hair on a rodent's behind what happens to 'christians' (sic) meaning Catholics. He is cozying up to the past few 'pretenders to the throne' simply to because they are his co-religionists as well.
    Lauder would like people to think that ISIS is a 'real military force' just sprung out of nowhere?? How could that have happened in a country that didn't have running water on and off for years and which the U.S. military has had under its boot for 10 years? How stupid does Lauder think we are? He makes me sick.
    ISIS means Israel (sic) Secret Intelligence Service - it's the creation of the Zionist west just as was the aptly named Alquaeda (or 'base' ---you know, as in the base of the pyramid or the profane and uninitiated into the 'mystery schools').
    Regarding 'Islam'; I think it was created, whole cloth, by the Pharisaical/Judaics as a counter to Christianity and to deflect the goy from their true (Judaic) enemy. Michael Hoffman has written on the 'strange convergence' between Judaics and Islamists in one of his recent newsletters.
    As for the 'artwork' which appeared with this cynical op-ed, I'll leave it up to those who know more about satanic imagery to explain what in h*ll it means. Lauder brings the stench of his masters everywhere he breathes.

    ReplyDelete