Monday, August 11, 2014

Voris borrows latest excuse from Malachi Martin

Most frighteningly for John Paul (II), he had come up against the irremovable presence of a malign strength in his own Vatican and in certain bishops' chanceries. It was what knowledgeable Churchmen called the "superforce."
-Keys of this Blood by Malachi Martin p. 632 -

Malachi Martin in his work, The Keys of this Blood: The Struggle for World Dominion between Pope John Paul II, Mikhail Gorbachev & the Capitalist West, posits The Judas Complex.  This thesis really deserves its own write-up as it is riddled with many errors but it suffices to say for this entry The Judas Complex is essentially the following;  The Pope is a traditionalist who has his every move and order blocked by the bishops who are Judases.  This started with the Second Vatican Council which has never been properly implemented and continues up to present day. 



Mike has changed from his don't say bad things line about Francis it's spiritual pornography line towards one in which Francis is a good guy and the bishops are evil.  His proof?  Look at Summorum Pontificum it was put into effect by Benedict XVI without the support of the bishops and most have ignored it since.  Yep, "the bishops always hold all the cards!" according to Voris.  So don't criticize Francis, instead criticize the evil bishops.  Thank goodness this excuse doesn't cut it anymore.  Anyone who can use a search engine can look at the Vatican's own website and see Francis' actions, his speeches, etc... Who is buying this line Voris & Company are selling?  Another half honest part of video goes along the lines of,
If you can criticize the bishops why can't you criticize [Francis]?
Criticizing [Francis] publicly doesn't change anything except drive some people to unapproved alternative Catholic groups.
The viewers of the Vortex must be jumping ship to "unapproved alternative Catholic groups" and Voris must recognize these groups as his competition for him to be so concerned about them.  Don't flee the Novus Ordo church!  

Malachi Martin is earning handsome residuals in the land beyond the grave.  First from his false John XXIII prayer and now by providing excuses for apologists of Francis.  This logic which Voris is borrowing is laughable!  Didn't Voris just on the 18 March 2014 Vortex Tell the Pope, Not The World! tell the viewer to write letters to Francis?  Now, he is saying it is a waste of time because the bishops hold all the power!  Mike got us so fired up we wrote letters to our local bishops instead of Francis.  Feel free to use our sample letter as a template below.  According to Voris it is certain to help us win back our parishes!
Dear local bishop,
We must criticize you and your behavior because Francis had Talmudic Jews and Evangelicals over to the Vatican for lunches.  Francis told blasphemous jokes to one group and to the other he said they need not convert.  After having both groups as guests he went and visited them where he apologized for the mean and nasty old church, you know the guys before glorious Vatican II.  To sum up our letter, we are mad that this happened and thanks goodness we watch the Vortex with Michael Voris and now know what to do!  Mr. Voris said on his show it was all your fault, so you better clean up your acts or else!  Start obeying Francis now!  One other thing is also your fault, Francis' favorite painting the White Crucifixion contains blasphemy against Our Lord's Most Holy NameSee to it this is fixed or you'll be getting more silly letters from us! 
-Call Me Jorge
P.S.  We included some photos and one video of one of your fellow bishops with the grievous abuse of distributing communion in the hand!  We find it astounding that this bishop has been transferred to Rome no less and unbelievably been promoted!  We reiterate these abuses by you must STOP!
links to points in letter


The Sixth Ecumenical Council, at Constantinople (680-681)

Forbade the faithful to take the Sacred Host in their hand, threatening transgressors with excommunication.




The Council of Rouen (650)

“Do not put the Eucharist in the hands of any layman or laywoman but only in their mouths.”

The Council of Saragossa (380)

Excommunicated anyone who dared continue receiving Holy Communion by hand. This was confirmed by the Synod of Toledo.

Pope St. Eutychian (275-283)

Forbade the faithful from taking the Sacred Host in their hand.

Pope St. Leo the Great (440-461)

Energetically defended and required faithful obedience to the practice of administering Holy Communion on the tongue of the faithful.

The Council of Trent (1545-1565)

“The fact that only the priest gives Holy Communion with his consecrated hands is an Apostolic Tradition.”

St. Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274) Summa Theologica, Volume III, Q. 82, Art. 3

“The dispensing of Christ’s Body belongs to the priest for three reasons. First, because He consecrates in the person of Christ. But as Christ consecrated His Body at the Supper, so also He gave It to others to be partaken of by them. Accordingly, as the consecration of Christ’s body belongs to the priest, so likewise does the dispensing belong to him. Secondly, because the priest is the appointed intermediary between God and the people, hence as it belongs to him to offer the people's gifts to God, so it belongs to him to deliver the consecrated gifts to the people. Thirdly, because out of reverence towards this sacrament, nothing touches it but what is consecrated, hence the corporal and the chalice are consecrated, and likewise the priest's hands, for touching this sacrament. Hence it is not lawful for anyone to touch it, except from necessity, for instance if it were to fall upon the ground, or else in some other case of urgency.”

10 comments:

  1. Yes, I fell for the old "prisoner of the Vatican" ploy once. Years later I read JPII's Catechesi Tradendae (see especially para 32-45) where he directs that children be taught false religions are a means of salvation. Of course this Apostatical Exhortation is written in Woytija's typical verbose, unclear, nearly impenetrable style so many try the "interpretation in light of blah blah blah" canard when this error is pointed out.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I believe this is from Michael Collins Piper's THE JUDAS GOATS from American Free Press, Chapter 19, pp. 188-191

    The Vatican's Own Enemy Within
    Buckley Associate Malachi Martin's Secret Role as a Subversive on Behalf of Zionist Interests

    The identity of an operative for the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) of B'nai B'rith inside the Catholic Church during the Second Vatican Council in the early 1960s has been revealed: the late ex-priest-turned-best-selling author: Malachi Martin, a longtime close associative of none other than William F. Buckley Jr. , himself an outspoken Roman Catholic. As a result of the revelations concerning Buckley's friend Martin, some prominent Catholic traditionalist critics now call Martin a "de facto Zionist double agent" and a "priest spy for Zionism" - labels that will come as a surprise to many good traditionalist Catholics who viewed Martin at least in his later years as their ally.

    It now turns out that this same "double agent" - Martin - was a financial backer of a conspiratorial group that was working to destroy Liberty Lobby, the Washington based populist institution.

    It was Cincinnati-based Lawrence W. Patterson who was apparently the first-ever national publisher to unveil Martin as the so-called "priest spy" inside the Vatican, who, in Patterson's words, was the key figure to "saving the Vatican II documents which have since been used to begin the attempted melding of Zionism and Catholicism."

    In the April 1991 issue of his magazine Criminal Politics, Patterson called Martin the magazine's "fake conservative of the month, fronting for the Trilateral/Zionist cause," and outlined the explosive evidence indicting Martin.

    But Patterson is not the only major figure to expose Martin. Widely regarded revisionist historian Michael A Hoffman II called Martin a "double-minded occultist" and a "20th century Judas." (See Hoffman's website at hoffman-info.com)

    In addition, Hutton Gibson, the outspoken lay traditionalist Catholic, said of Martin on a broadcast of Radio Free America (with host Tom Valentine) that "I think Martin was kind of a Judas Goat. He was at the Second Vatican Council and one of the things he did was call in bishops who were a little obstreperous and threaten them to get in line. Malachi Martin is not my idea of a Catholic."

    The late Revilo P. Oliver, one of the great naitonalist intellectuals, wrote that "if Martin did indeed play an important role in betraying the [Catholic] Church into the hands of its inveterate enemies, he certainly knew what he was doing (See Oliver's essay, "How They Stole the Church," at revilo-oliver.com).

    ReplyDelete
  3. Collins Piper continued:

    Hoffman said that Martin "saved the day for the Jewish/Masonic infiltrators of the church." In Criminal Politics, Patterson explained how Martin did just that, outlining the amazing story of Martin's intrigue.

    Relying largely on an indubitably "mainstream" article, "How the Jews Changed Catholic Thinking" by Joseph Roddy - published in the January 25 1966 issue of the now-defunct LOOK magazine - Patterson pointed out that the LOOK article revealed quite candidly that a priest working inside the Vatican was shuttling back and forth between Rome and New York during the Vatican II proceedings.

    The priest was providing inside information about proposed Catholic Church "reforms" to not only The New York Times, but also to the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) of B'nai B'rith and the American Jewish Committee and its magazine, Commentary.

    Then, as the article noted, this confidential information leaked from inside the Vatican was then used to pressure the Vatican into making major changes in church policy.

    The LOOK author would not identify the priest by his real name, referring only to him as "Timothy Fitzharris O'Boyle," but also explained that this priest also wrote for Commentary under the name "F.E. Cartus" and head written a book entitled The Pilgrim, under the name "Michael Serafian."

    (The Pilgrim was a 1964 book, rushed into print, according to Michael A Hoffman II, for the very purpose of divulging efforts by traditionalists inside the Vatican to counter the proposed revolution in church teachings.)

    As Lawrence Patterson's investigation determined, when Malachi Martin (by then an internationally known writer) released his 1974 book The New Castle, a filler page listing "books by Malachi Martin" indicated that Martin had written the aforementioned book, The Pilgrim, "under the pseudonym Michael Serafian."

    And as if Patterson's revelations (based on Martin's own published acknowledgment) are not enough evidence that he was indeed the "priest spy" inside the Vatican, a July 31, 1999 Milwaukee Journal Sentinel obituary for Martin said that he had published The Pilgrim under the "Michael Serafian" pseudonym.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Collins Piper continued:

    Almost immediately after completing his subversive ventures inside the Vatican, Martin left the priesthood and went to New York where he began writing for the American Jewish Committee's Commentary (under his real name) and acting as "religious editor" for William F. Buckley Jr.'s National Review.

    In the years that followed, Martin's novels and other works received widespread international promotion in the organs of the major media, making Martin almost certainly a multi-millionaire.

    According to Michael A. Hoffman II, Martin "was the descendent of a Jewish banker who sought refuge in Ireland," where Martin was born in 1921. Hoffman scored Martin for, as recently as 1997, comparing himself with Maimonides, whom Hoffman identifies as "the foremost interpreter of the Jewish Talmud and one of the most implacable enemies of Christ in the annals of Judaism" who once "commanded the extermination of Christians."

    This is interesting since Martin, in fact, did study at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem where he concentrated on the knowledge of Jesus Christ as transmitted in Jewish sources. Soon afterward, according to London's Independent of August 6, 1999, Martin was "marked out as a high flyer" and promoted to a post at the Vatican as a theological advisor to Cardinal Augustin Bea, who was himself, along with several other of his advisors, of Jewish descent.

    It was Bea who emerged inside the Vatican as the prime mover behind the changes in church policy during Vatican II, and Martin acted as his agent in dealings with the Jewish community in New York City during that time frame. Revilo Oliver went so far as to suggest that Martin may have actually been a "courier" for vast amounts of cash bribes transferred out of New York to Rome and elsewhere during the Vatican II period.

    The fact that Martin forged a close relationship with William F. Buckley Jr. - one that lasted for decades - is noteworthy since both Buckley and his former supervisor in the CIA, E. Howard Hunt, waged extensive (albeit failed) lawsuits against the Spotlight for the purpose of demolishing the populist weekly. Thus the question remains as to whether Martin was later acting as an agent for the vengeful team of Buckley and Hunt in assisting other operatives who were working to silence the Spotlight.

    The bottom line: Malachi Martin's role in financing a conspiracy to destroy the Spotlight does point toward the origin of that conspiracy, and it is safe to say that Martin was clearly a prime example of The Enemy Within - in this case invovled in the subversion of the Roman Catholic Church.

    The damage done to the church by the revolutionary conclave known as Vatican II may never be undone and the future will remember Malachi Martin as a treacherous Judas Goat of the worst order.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Inset inside Piper Collins article:

    "Satan's smoke has made it's way into the Temple of god through some crack." Giovanni Batista Montini

    BETTER KNOWN UNDER HIS TITLE of Pope Paul VI - under which name he implemented the controversial Vatican II "reforms" that re-directed and distorted traditional Roman Catholic doctrine - at a time when Judas Goat Malachi Martin (see accompanying chapter) was acting as an agent inside the Vatican II conference on behalf of Zionist interests. On more than one occasion, Montini (above [insert shows ephod photo]) publicly wore the Freemasonic emblem known as the "ephod," the symbol worn by Caiaphas, the Jewish High Priest who ordered the death of Jesus Christ. Montini's ephod can be seen (circled) at the bottom of his portrait. At right is an ephod in which Hebrew letters can be clearly seen at the top. Said to be of Jewish extraction, Montini was buried Jewish-style, in a plain wooden box, in a ceremony at the Vatican which featured not a single crucifix. Many traditionalist Catholics consider Montini a Judas Goat. Zionist interests hae also forcefully infiltrated Protestant fundamentalist churches, promoting the "dispensationalist" doctrine, first cooked up by John Darby in the 1840s and then widely promoted in the 20th century by Cyrus Scofield, whose famous "Scofield Reference Bible" was financed by the Zionist Rothschild family-funded Oxford University Press in London. Today, Rothschild-sponsored "dispensationalism" dictates the pro-Zionist stance of the so-called "Christian right," a major influence in the Republican Party. Thus, an alliance between Radical Judaism and Radical Christianity is responsible for the misconduct of U.S. foreign policy for the benefit of the Zionist imperium under President George W. Bush, a fervent disciple of dispensationalism surrounded by Zionist fanatics.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Call him Zio-Jorge and you have the answer to all questions.

    ReplyDelete
  7. For a description of Malachi Martin read
    HOW THEY STOLE THE CHURCH, by Professor Revilo P. Oliver

    www.revilo-oliver.com/church.htm

    ReplyDelete
  8. Why the traitor and idolater of Francis Michael Voris does not report this ?

    http://gloria.tv/media/nCJSb4tLizz

    ReplyDelete
  9. I have read The Jesuits, Windswept House, and the Decline and Fall of the Roman Church. Please do not fall for the horsebleep from the enemy camp that this priest was a spy. I have listened to his tapes as well. What he does is expose the enemies of the Church and how they've taken control, and he does this with tears in his eyes for his beloved Church. Do you believe an Exorcist, as he was, could be a Z spy?

    ReplyDelete
  10. Mike Voris is a naive fool who eventually will be out of a job.The novus ordo and everyone in it will implode.I still can't believe there are people who listen to his zionist drivel.I pray that when the Novus ordo goes bankrupt, people like Mike Voris will embrace the true catholic faith.

    ReplyDelete