Thursday, April 16, 2015

Francis administers his daily spanking to traditionalists

"Those who reject dialogue, disobey God!"

11 comments:

  1. Did anyone hear about the invalid south American "bishop" saying traditional catholics will die for rejecting Vatican 2?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No, but I did see part of a video wherein Fr. Joseph Pfeiffer (SSPX resistance) saying that anyone who isn't 'one' with Bergoglio as a man (not as 'pope') cannot go to heaven; and that Bergoglio couldn't commit the evil he is committing if he weren't 'pope'. He also stated that sedevacantism is one of the 'great evils of this era'. So there is plenty of stupidity to go around. The confusion runs amok.

      Delete
    2. I saw the same video.Sometimes I wonder if the SSPX & SSPX-MC are false Vatican 2 resistance? We are blessed to have a true catholic church 25 miles from home. (Non SSPX non Vatican 2)

      Delete
  2. And The Most Holy Family Monastery administers a spanking to the R&R groups!
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b1v5t0xbcUo

    ReplyDelete
  3. Could the heretic Satan Worshiper Frances cite the Biblical reference for this statement? What a filthy rotten pedophile creep w/his abortion legalizing, pedophile, sexually perverse crew of demons Danneels, Maradiaga, Errazuriz, McCarrick and Barros:

    "Cardinal Errazuriz is one of eight cardinals personally chosen by Pope Francis to serve on his key advisory panel. This is the same Cardinal Errazuriz that testified in court that he failed to act on several abuse allegations because he believed them to be untrue. Is this Francis’ idea of reform? Despite his protestations, promises of reform, and splashy commissions, Pope Francis not only appoints bishops who cover up clergy abuse of children, but he also elevates them to his prestigious Council of 8."
    http://remnantnewspaper.com/web/index.php/articles/item/1684-reformer-of-the-clergy-pope-francis-fails-his-first-real-test

    "Council of 8" (used to be gang of 8) but then we were told it had NINE members:

    "Council of Nine can refer to: In Greek mythology[edit] In Greek mythology, when Prometheus gave Fire to mankind, he infuriated Zeus, so to punish Prometheus, Zeus had him chained to a rock and every day an eagle came down and ate his liver. The liver grew back and the eagle returned to do the same to him the next day. To punish mankind, Zeus and eight other deities gathered to form the Council of Nine. The council members were Aphrodite, Apollo, Athena, Demeter, Hephaestus, Hera, Hermes, Poseidon and Zeus. ...In the Church of Satan[edit]
    The council that governs the Church of Satan call themselves the Council of Nine."

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Council_of_Nine

    P.S. Hear SW Frances wants to reduce greenhouse gasses (w/his encyclical) but think he should reduce the size of his stomach first (beam in his own eye) (would hate to be in a room w/him)!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for this info.

      Delete
  4. Neither Jesus Christ nor The Apostles "dialogued" with non-believers - they proselytised them and if they wouldn't listen then they went no further - in fact, Jesus advised them to wipe the dust from their feet at any town or place where the inhabitants did not receive The Gospel. Francis twists the true sense of the divine mandate to preach The Gospel throughout the world in the name of The Blessed Trinity - something the post-conciliar popes have been adept at avoiding. In fact, I notice Francis hides his pectoral cross when he is entertaining his Talmudic rabbi friends at The Vatican and elsewhere because this embarrasses him. This is not dialogue but deference.

    When Christ met the Pharisees He knew they had no interest in dialogue with Him because their agenda was to rewrite the true sense of Judaic oral traditions to their own selfish benefit and they also wanted to catch Him out & have Him silenced for good. Jesus also knew that The Jews were no longer on the path to salvation since they were about to reject Him and have Him executed. In addition, He knew that the Old Covenant with them was almost over for good and the New Covenant was to replace it - something else the post-conciliar popes deftly deny. Once again, this is not dialogue but cowardly deference. We can only be saved by water and baptism through The Way, The Truth and The Life who is Our Blessed Lord - doesn't the liberal modernist church & its popes know and understand that?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Nothing wrong with dialogue ,unless it compromises the Catholic Faith ,when Catholic Altars are replaced with tables ,and Crucifixes are taken down or covered up so as to not "offend "other religions ,that's not dialogue ,that's diabolic.when its ok to offend Christ rather then offend one of his creatures,that's putting man above God .I do not see any other Religion making concessions ,why is it only the Catholic Church that must alter its Rites and places of Worship.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's why I don't support Notre Dame in South Bend,IN.When Barry Sotero spoke there in 2009,they covered up the crucifix so he wouldn't be offended.

      Delete
    2. The Vatican 2 sect is not the Catholic church.

      Delete
    3. Why is it, you ask, that it's only the Catholic Church that must alter its rites, etc.? Because the Catholic Church is the One True Faith of the triune God. (And I'm not talking about the post Vatican II, conciliar church.) The true Catholic Church was the only bulwark standing between man and a return to the pagan-hell-on-earth.

      Delete