Bp. Fellay talks about the proposed agreement delivered to the FSSPX by Rome in July

video & translated excerpts from: Non Possumus, FELLAY HABLA SOBRE LA PROPUESTA DE ACUERDO ENTREGADA POR ROMA A LA FSSPX EN JULIO PASADO


ENGLISH 

(Translation by Non Possumus, Please feel free to make any contribution to it)

THE SITE FELLAYCIST "to true Christianity," POSTED TODAY HAS A VIDEO, RECORDED LAST NOVEMBER, IN WHICH THE TOP OF THE SPEAKS OUT SSPX.

Excerpt of the sayings of Bishop Fellay (Subtitles are ours)

ROME REDUCED THE REQUIREMENTS FOR AN AGREEMENT

At the beginning of July, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith has again made a proposal to the Society, the interesting thing is esta That proposal has eliminated the two conditions in September two years early.

Then, They do not ask us to say That the New Mass is licit and do not ask Either to Recognize That the Council is Traditional.

"ROME NO LONGER WANTS TO IMPOSE MODERNISM"

There are interesting points in esta discussion: first, They Recognize us as Catholics.Second, we are Told That are open issues (religious freedom, ecumenism, new mass, collegiality).

If They Say These Things are open, It Means That They Have renounced to impose.For me, this is the first step to, finally, after a long time, reach the condemnation of These Things.

WE SHOULD WAIT UNTIL ROME EVEN 100 YEARS THE CURRENT MODERNIST Condemns ERRORS.

For many years Rome will not say That this is an error. Within 100 years Maybe They Will say so, as (in the case of) the condemnation of Honorius.

ALSO, THE SSPX REDUCES ITS CONDITIONS TO ONLY ONE "TO ACCEPT US AS WE ARE"

What are we going to do With This proposal? It Seems to me impossible. It's impossible to Work With them. What I do now is to say to Rome: the only one, the sine qua non to accept a recognition -which is normally Because We're Catholics- is to accept us as we are condition.

The Liturgical ISSUE COMES FIRST, THE DOCTRINE IS postponed. THE SSPX RENOUNCES TO FIGHT FOR THE KINGDOM OF CHRIST.

What does it mean "as we are"? Means it than we will never say the new mass, we will never concelebrate, we will never give the communion in the hand, we will never give communion in the new mass; and the Opposed, we will say to the people to do not Attend the new mass, do not to take communion in the hand, we will say to priest That's Necessary to examine it to find out if They are priest or not.

That I think to say to Rome That must be enough (for them) to say no. But we say: "If you do not agree With That, do not worth to move ahead Because We're not going to change".

CLEAR NOTHING FOR THE FUTURE. Merely THE SSPX WILL REACT TO ROME'S INITIATIVES.

I think this is going to stop anything for a while.

With the current Pope, WHO goes from one surprise to another, it seems, to me impossible to predict the future.

Again, BP. FELLAY SEES "SPRING BUDS"

Already there are some Bishops starting to approach us saying "we need you".

And Then They are beginning to ask for our help, for example, preaching the retreats for the diocese 'priests.

This Road I think will continue. Little by little we will help the Bishops, priests, to return to Tradition.


video & translated excerpts from: Non Possumus, FELLAY HABLA SOBRE LA PROPUESTA DE ACUERDO ENTREGADA POR ROMA A LA FSSPX EN JULIO PASADO