Thursday, October 6, 2016

Francis takes his ‘Jubilee Year of Mercy’ to its logical conclusion

Francis knows best.  ‘I’ll show you what Mercy is!’


Six days before the Jubilee Year of Mercy kicked off (2 December 2015), an interview with Francis appeared in the Italian magazine Credere (Believe).  This magazine is the ‘official magazine’ of the Jubilee.  In the interview, Francis explains his motives and expectations for the Year of Mercy.  One of the questions posed to Francis was,
“Can the Jubilee of Mercy be an opportunity to rediscover God's 'maternity'? Is there an almost 'feminine' aspect of the Church that must be valued?”

Francis’ answer is most revealing,
“Yes, God Himself affirms this when He says in the Book of Isaiah that a mother could perhaps forget her child, even a mother can forget, but 'I will never forsake you'. Here we see the maternal dimension of God. Not everyone understands when we speak about God's maternity, it is not part of 'popular' language – in the good sense of the word – and may seem rather elitist; for this reason I prefer to speak about the tenderness, typical of a mother, God's tenderness that comes from his innate paternity. God is both father and mother”.

We underlined the last sentence to his answer so it wouldn’t slip by.  Here we have Francis say explicitly that God has both sexes.  Where did this idea come from?  Glad you asked.  Francis’ fellow revolutionary from South America, Leonardo Boff, shares a very similar idea and coincidentally the two are in touch with each other regularly through an intermediary.  Boff writes that a voice like a whisper (a demon in our opinion) came to him one day as he sat at his computer and uttered,
“Son, this is the truth you must proclaim: though Mary, God was revealed as both God-the-Father and God-the-Mother, also with the characteristics of the feminine: love, tenderness, caring, compassion and mercy. These virtues also are present in men, but they find a more visible expression in women.  Son, when you say God-the-Mother you will discover the feminine side of God, with all the feminine virtues.”

Here we have two revolutionaries whom are in contact with each other stating that God has both sexes.  This is nothing other than rabbincal Judaism’s Hermaphrodite god.  A reuniting of the Shekinah—female with Ein Sof—male.  In 2004, the Vatican’s Pontifical Council for Inter-religious Dialogue and The Pontifical Council for Culture published “Jesus Christ the Bearer of the Water of Life: A Christian Reflection on the New Age” a “study (which) is concerned with the complex phenomenon of “New Age” which is influencing many aspects of contemporary culture.”  In it one reads the following belief held by many New Agers,
“The New Age which is dawning will be peopled by perfect, androgynous beings who are totally in command of the cosmic laws of nature. In this scenario, Christianity has to be eliminated and give way to a global religion and a new world order.”

Where does this belief come from?  The answer is simple, it is from Orthodox Judaism. In an article by Gary Stern, Rabbi unveils secret of God, one reads,
Rabbi Mark Sameth contends in a soon-to-be-published article that the four-letter Hebrew name for God - held by Jewish tradition to be unpronounceable since the year 70 - should actually be read in reverse. When the four letters are flipped, he says, the new name makes the sounds of the Hebrew words for "he" and "she."
God thus becomes a dual-gendered deity, bringing together all the male and female energy in the universe, the yin and the yang that have divided the sexes from Adam and Eve to Homer and Marge."
This is the kind of God I believe in, the kind of God that makes sense to me, in a language that speaks very, very deeply to human aspirations and striving," Sameth said. "How could God be male and not female?"

We will return to this Talmudic Jewish idea of a dual-gendered deity in a little while, so please keep it in the back of your mind as you read the rest of the entry.

On the recent return flight to Rome, Italy from Baku, Azerbaijan Francis held his usual in-flight presser.  One of the questions posed to him was the following,
“what would you say to someone who has struggled with their sexuality for years and feels that there is truly a problem of biology, that his aspect doesn't correspond to what he or she feels is their sexual identity. You, as a pastor and minister, how would you accompany these people?”

Francis replied:
First of all: in my life as a priest and bishop, even as Pope, I have accompanied people with homosexual tendencies, I have also met homosexual persons, accompanied them, brought them closer to the Lord, as an apostle, and I have never abandoned them. People must be accompanied as Jesus accompanies them, when a person who has this condition arrives before Jesus, Jesus surely doesn't tell them 'go away because you are homosexual.' What I said is that wickedness which today is done in the indoctrination of gender theory...a French father told me that he was speaking with his children at the table, he and his wife were Catholics, 'rosewater Catholics,' but Catholics! And he asked his 10-year-old son: 'What do you want to be when you grow up?'- 'a girl.' The father realized that at school they were teaching him gender theory, and this is against the natural things. One thing is that a person has this tendency, this condition and even changes their sex, but it's another thing to teach this in line in schools in order to change the mentality. This is what I call ideological colonization. Last year I received a letter from a Spaniard who told me his story as a child, a young man, he was a girl, a girl who suffered so much because he felt he felt like a boy, but was physically a girl. He told his mother and the mom…(the girl) was around 22 years old said that she would like to do the surgical intervention and all of those things. And the mother said not to do it while she was still alive. She was elderly and she died soon after. She had the surgery and an employee of a ministry in the city of Spain went to the bishop, who accompanied (this person) a lot. Good bishop. I spent time accompanying this man. Then (the man) got married, he changed his civil identity, got married and wrote me a letter saying that for him it would be a consolation to come with his wife, he who was she, but him! I received them: they were happy and in the neighborhood where he lived there was an elderly priest in his 80s, an elderly pastor who left the parish and helped the sisters in the parish. And there was the new (priest). When the new one he would yell from the sidewalk: 'you'll go to hell!' When (the new priest) came across the old one, he would say: 'How long has it been since you confessed? Come, come, let's to so that I can confess you and you can receive communion.' Understood?

Life is life and things must be taken as they come. Sin is sin. And tendencies or hormonal imbalances have many problems and we must be careful not to say that everything is the same. Let's go party. No, that no, but in every case I accept it, I accompany it, I study it, I discern it and I integrate it. This is what Jesus would do today! Please don't say: 'the Pope sanctifies transgenders.' Please, eh! Because I see the covers of the papers. Is there any doubt as to what I said? I want to be clear! It's moral problem. It's a human problem and it must be resolved always can be with the mercy of God, with the truth like we spoke about in the case of marriage by reading all of Amoris Laetitia, but always with an open heart. And don't forget that chapter Vézelay, it's very beautiful, eh! Very beautiful.

and here is a slightly different but better translation of Francis’ reply:
“Throughout my life as a priest, bishop and even as Pope, I have accompanied people with a homosexual inclination and who practice homosexuality. I have accompanied them and brought them closer to the Lord, some are not able… But people must be accompanied as Jesus accompanies them. When someone with this condition comes before Jesus, he will certainly not say: ‘Go away, for you are homosexual!’ What I am referring to is that wickedness shown today, by indoctrinating people with the gender theory. A French father told me that he was chatting with his children at table once and asked his 10-year-old son: ‘what do you want to be when you grow up?’ ‘A girl!’ the boy said. The father realised that school text books were teaching the gender and this goes against what is natural. For a person to have this inclination, or this option or those who change sex, is one thing. It is quite another to teach according to this line at school, in order to change people’s mentality. This is what I call “ideological colonisations”. Last year I received a letter from a Spanish male who was telling me about his story as a child and as a teen. It was a female child, a girl who had suffered a great deal. She felt like a boy but was physically a girl. She had told her mother about it, saying she wanted to have a sex change. The mother asked her not to have it done while she was still alive. She was elderly and died soon. The girl had the surgery and he now works at a ministry in Spain. He went to see the bishop and the bishop gave him a great deal of guidance. He was a good bishop, he “wasted” time accompanying this man. The man later married, changed his civil identity and he – who was a she but is now a he – wrote to tell me he would take comfort in coming to see me. I received them. He told me that in the neighbourhood where he lived there was an elderly priest, the old parish priest and the new one. When the new parish priest saw him, he would shout to him from the sidewalk: ‘You will go to hell!’ When he came across the old man, he would say to him: ‘How long has it been since your last confession? Come, come…’ 
Life is life and things must be taken as they come. Sin is sin. Inclinations or hormonal imbalances cause many problems and we need to be careful when claiming all cases are the same: we need to embrace and study each case, accompany the person, discern and integrate them. This is what Jesus would do today. But please don’t go and say now: the Pope is going to sanctify transsexuals! I can just picture the front pages of the newspapers…It is a human problem, a moral problem. And we need to resolve it as best we can, always with God’s mercy and with truth but always with an open heart.”

Wow, talk about an answer that is all over the place!  Francis the modernist really shines in his answer with the vague language he uses so that the listener may read into Francis’ words whatever position he holds.  We have Francis condemn “ideological colonization” — his term for teaching homosexuality, lesbianism, ‘gender theory’, and every other abhorrent deviant behavior in schools — and only a few sentences later refer to a biological female as a male!  What is really disgusting is that Francis invited this biological female and her then fiance (now wife) to the Vatican for a visit and he is OK with their perverse thinking.  Francis follows that gem with “sin is sin” and one needs “to embrace” and “accompany” each person so that one can “discern” the truth “as this is what Jesus would do today”.  How revolting!  Francis accepts a marriage between two women and sees no problem with them receiving communion and has the chutzpah to say Our Savior, Jesus the Christ would do the same!

In the answer published by Catholic News Agency Francis refers to Amoris laetitia and how it solved the problem for divorced and remarried as the proper guidelines in what to do in cases of the those confused about their God created sex.  Cardinal George Pell warned in October 2014 concerning the Synod on the Family,
“Communion for the divorced and remarried is for some -- very few, certainly not the majority of synod fathers -- it's only the tip of the iceberg, it's a stalking horse. They want wider changes, recognition of civil unions, recognition of homosexual unions”.  

According to Italian reporter Sandro Magister, “Buenos Aires and Rome. For Francis, These Are the Model Dioceses”.  What does Rome have to say about communion for the divorced and remarried?
The text of the apostolic exhortation does not go further, but footnote 351 states: “In certain cases, this can include the help of the sacraments.” The pope uses the conditional, so he is not saying that they must be admitted to the sacraments, although he does not exclude this in some cases and under some conditions. Pope Francis develops the previous magisterium in the line of the hermeneutic of continuity and of exploration, and not in discontinuity and rupture.  [Underlining is in the original document.]
and a little bit further reads,
But when the concrete circumstances of a couple make it feasible, meaning when their journey of faith has been long, sincere, and progressive, it is proposed that they live in continence; if this decision is difficult to practice for the stability of the couple, “Amoris Laetitia” does not rule out the possibility of accessing penance and the Eucharist.

What about Buenos Aires?

Amoris Laetitia does not ignore the difficulties of this option (cf. footnote 329) and leaves open the possibility of access to the sacrament of reconciliation when they fail in this commitment (cf. footnote 364, according to the teaching of St. John Paul II to Cardinal W. Baum of 03/22/1996)...If you realize that in a particular case there are limitations that mitigate responsibility and guilt (cf. footnote 301-302), particularly when a person considers that he would fall into subsequent sin that hurts the children of the new (adulterous) union, Amoris Laetitia opens up the possibility of access to the sacraments of reconciliation and the Eucharist (cf. footnotes 336 and 351). These in turn will dispose the person to mature and grow with the help of grace.

So, if Francis believes in leaving the door open for the divorced and remarried (those now committing the sin of adultery) on a case by case situation isn’t it logical to conclude that he feels the same way about homosexuality?  Let us stay a little longer in the diocese of Buenos Aires, Jorge Bergoglio’s old stomping grounds, and investigate what happened in the past.  Leonardo Boff, the revolutionary who believes in a hermaphrodite god, shared the following with the German weekly magazine Der Spiegel in April 2013,
“a few months ago he [Jorge Bergoglio] explicitly permitted a homosexual couple to adopt a child. He kept in touch with priests who were expelled from the official church because they had gotten married. And no one could ever persuade him to change his position, which was: we have to be on the side of the poor, even if it means opposing the powerful.”

Or what about the revelation from the pro-homosexual activist Marcelo Marquez in March 2013 as he recounted his phone conversation with the then Cardinal Bergoglio,
“He [Jorge Bergoglio] told me. ... 'I'm in favor of gay rights and in any case, I also favor civil unions for homosexuals, but I believe that Argentina is not yet ready for a gay marriage law.'”

And who could forget Cardinal Bergoglio allowing a decade long cohabitating homosexual couple, Roberto Carlos ‘Florencia de la V’ Trinidad and Pablo Goycochea, to have their adopted twins baptized in the Basilica of the Most Holy Sacrament in Buenos Aires, Argentina on 25 August 2012?  Fr. Jorge Garcia Cuerva reportedly performed the baptisms after he gave communion to the homosexual couple.


Roberto Carlos ‘Flor de la V’ Trinidad the man in the dress above 
had his body surgically butchered so as to resemble a woman.


Is it not sensible to conclude that Francis speaks out of both sides of his mouth while his behavior demonstrates that he is a revolutionary?  Leonardo Boff concurs.  Excerpt from an interview with Boff conducted by Juan Arias of El País,
Boff told me that Pope Francis has accepted the most primitive concept of liberation theology in his program. "Remember, Juan, that theologian Carlos Scanone, who launched that theology in Argentina, was a professor of Bergoglio, the future pope, when he was teaching theology in a school on the outskirts of Buenos Aires."

Juan Carlos Scannone gave an interview in October 2013 in which he lays out how the pontificate of Francis will play out according to the revolutionary liberation theology he taught Bergoglio.   As we have previously covered in Call Me Jorge... Scannone’s revolutionary liberation theology is nothing other than concepts from the Talmud he learned from Emmanuel Lévinas, a Jewish philosopher whom John Paul II greatly admired and was a student of during his summers at Castel Gandolfo.  Is the true Francis beginning to sink in?  Let’s continue down the path of Francis behavior after he left Buenos Aires for Rome and began to implement his revolution of false Mercy. The following examples are by no means exhaustive, they just happen to be some of the well-known ones.


Andrea ‘Trans of Termini’ Quintero

Andrea Quintero was a homeless drug addicted Colombian man who self-identified as a woman, who was beaten to death.  Andrea styled himself the ‘Trans of Termini’ (Termini is the main train station of Rome and where Andrea slept and picked up men.) and five months after his death with no one claiming the body, the Jesuit order (to which Francis belonged) stepped in and saw to it that Andrea was given a funeral at the Church of the Gesù, the mother church of Francis’ Jesuit order which was attended by a who’s who from the homosexual community in Italy in December 2013.   Did Francis’ almoner pick up the tab?


Francesco 'Ghyblj' Lombardi

Francesco 'Ghyblj' Lombardi a porn star getting himself and his parrot blessed at a general audience.  Lombardi said he is in love with Francis.   Some might object that Francis had no idea who this man was but to us at Call Me Jorge... it just reflects the mess that is Francis.  For Francis didn’t correct the man about his sins or try to disassociate himself from his action when questioned about Mr. Lombardi and the general audience.  Instead, he shrugged his shoulders as if to say it is what it is.


Francis washing and kissing the feet of a man dressed as a woman.

Communion for a man who identifies as a lady.

Francis loves to break Catholic rules as he claims not to like rigidity which is only true if it concerns Catholic morals.  In April of 2015 during his Maundy Thursday service Francis washed the feet of his usual women, prisoners, and Moslems but that wasn’t enough.  Francis took it up a level by also washing the feet of a man who self-identifies as a women, Isabel Lisboa (we have no clue what his given name is).  And if that weren’t enough after the foot washing he received communion right in front of Francis’ eyes and he didn’t even blink.  If that isn’t consent, then what is?


Yayo Grassi and Iwan Bagus with Francis.

During his October 2015 trip to the United States of America, Francis visited the capital of the Federal government, Washington, D.C..  While at the papal nunciature,  he greeted several people including Kim Davies and her husband.  The Vatican through its spokesman, Thomas ‘three Martinis a day’ Rosica, said that Francis felt, “a sense of regret” that he had met with Kim Davies and “it should not be considered a form of support on her position in all of its particular and complex aspects.”  What’s complex about not issuing marriage certificates to homosexuals and lesbians?  Thomas ‘three Martinis a day’ Rosica continued, “The only 'private' audience granted by Francis was to his former student and his family.”  Hmmm, who was Francis’ former student and family?  Why none other than the homosexual couple of 19 years — Yayo Grassi & Iwan Bagus!


Macarena, Francis, and Neria (with glasses and mustache) pose for 
a photo after their 24 January 2015 meeting at the Vatican.

Back to the in-flight presser.  Who was the woman who self-identified as a man that Francis met at  the Vatican with her lover?  None other than Neria ‘Diego’ Lejárraga and as luck would have it on 26 September 2016 only days before Francis spoke about her on his plane flight from Baku to Rome an interview was published with Neria on the website Religión Digital with the title, El transexual que fue recibido por el Papa Francisco presentó en Madrid "El despiste de Dios".  The following quotes from Neria should really hammer in the idea that Francis isn’t Catholic.
 “After seeing the Pope, I left with my head held high. I went Mass and took communion.  Read between the lines.”
...“they ask me how after all that has happened to me that I still believe, and tell them for me, the Church is what I'm living now. The church is called Bergoglio, it is called Father Angel*, the church is on the ball and not separating, it is a church that is welcoming and not judging. This is the church that I have always wanted.”

* Call Me Jorge’s Note: Padre Angel (aka Fr. Angel) is an elderly Spanish priest who is friends with Neria.  It is not a stretch to imagine this is same old priest referred to by Francis in his in-Flight interview answer.  Padre Angel has recently been in the Spanish Catholic medias for his scandalous behavior of baptizing 15 children of homosexuals.  Angel in his defense says that he blesses animals so why not baptize children even if they will be brought up in the homosexual lifestyle.   He recently bragged in an article on himself, “An Argentine friend of Pope Francis came to see me this week at the Church of San Anton and entering said: "This church, Father Angel, smells like sheep." And I was thrilled...’”


Neria continues and like the delusional rabbis instead of accepting Christ as their Lord and Savior fashions a god of their own liking.
“I refuse to stop believing in God that I want. Something inside you tells you that you're right ...”

When asked if she ever thought she was doing something morally wrong, is a sinner, or is sick, Neria replied,
“A sinner, of course. But a sick, never. They call you sick, they say you are a frivolous, it’s vicious, they call you a lesbian ... they do not know. Transsexualism is a difficult subject to understand, and I understand.  It’s complicated, I have never asked anyone to understand me.  But let me go on my way.  I'm not picking on anyone, I just want to survive.  I just want to be happy, because living in the prison of a body that does not love you is frightening, and now I find no freedom, because I will never reach it, you have to must be realistic ...”

How sad that Neria like so many with psychological disorders doesn’t realize she is sick and Francis is going along with her delusion that she is a man.  Is this what Francis means by “accompany”?  Being an accessory to sin?
“This Pope is opening doors, fresh air is entering into the Vatican that I believe has never entered (before). This will change it over time.”

Neria on the first phone call from Francis to her,
“I started to get nervous, he laughed and told me that he had my letter in hand...That conversation is the least that I remember, because we have spoken more times since.  He said to me, listen, I want to see you in Rome.  He was calling me, and he did. Every time I had contact (with him) it was he who called.  There has never been a middleman.”

She then relates that she and Macarena met with Francis for many hours and the three of them discussed many things before they left.  When leaving Francis waved good-bye to the lesbian couple.  Neria then describes her thoughts after meeting Francis,
“But I took to the feeling of being a normal person, and stopped feeling like I was doing something wrong.  You asked me before if I felt doubt, when they pressured me, if I was in sin, I would have had to change everything... But I am what I am.  The meeting with the Pope was a shower with the best (shower) gels, of purity, of tranquility, of security. I'm still the same nobody as ever, but I left there with my head high saying, I am safe.”

Since the fateful meeting with Francis, Neria has resolved,
“I'm going to live again for that which I had refused myself, or what I had forbidden myself, such as communion and the sacraments...I do not intend to make this a spectacle.”

Then why write a book about  your encounter with Francis and appear in many television and radio interviews?  You, Neria had forbidden the sacraments to yourself because that is what the Church teaches — your behavior is sinful — and it is evident you were taught your Catholic catechism properly.  What you need to do is go to confession and repent of your sins.  Upon leaving the confessional you then need to change your sinful behavior and reform!

Neria also shared previous thoughts on God in April 2016, on the same website Religión Digital, El transexual que fue recibido por el Papa presentó "El despiste de Dios",
“You can not be appropriating of a God who is not only yours. The Creator loves all of us equally, no matter the race, the religion, the social class or the sexual identity we have.”

Yes, this is what a woman looks like after she has had surgeries to make her appear male and taken a boat load of male hormones.



Neria posted this to her facebook page after hearing Francis’ in-flight presser.  The Spanish translates into English as “The Holy Father speaks of me during a flight and embraces ALL BEINGS HUMANS EQUALLY, It is something that never will I be able to neither will I know thank you.  THANK YOU MY FRIEND!!!!!!”


The Spanish language newspaper Hoy published several news stories which were excerpted partially by Vatican reporter and biographer of Francis, Austen Ivereigh, into English for the entry ‘Of course you are a son of the Church’, Francis tells transgender man on Catholic Voices Comment,
“If you have no money, when you’re both here I’ll give you an envelope to cover your expenses, that’s no problem. You know I live with other priests in the Santa Marta guesthouse. When you get here, tell the Swiss Guards you have a meeting with me, and that’s it.” 

But not to worry, the Bishopric of Plasencia, Amadeo Rodríguez Magro, who has “accompanied” Neria and Macarena through their lesbian journey decided to pick up the tab for the couple’s visit to the Vatican and subsequent sightseeing vacation in Rome.  Neria explains exactly what is meant by the support she received from Rodríguez Magro,
“It’s not that I was angry with the Church beforehand.  But there were attitudes often expressed that I didn’t like. But not from everyone, because the bishop has always been very good to me, and I’ve been well supported by him. But it’s been hard at times.”

Recall that Neria wrote Francis in the Vatican because,
“My prison was my own body because it did not correspond at all with what my soul felt.”

This is a soul crying out for help.  Instead of helping her, Francis indulged her mental sickness.  Francis in the initial phone call to Neria not only invited her to the Vatican with her female lover but told her that,
“God loves all his children, however they are; you are a son of God, who accepts you exactly as you are. Of course you are a son of the Church!”



Now onto the book Neria wrote even though she claims publicly she didn’t want to make a “spectacle”.  This is so laughable it isn’t funny.  A person who knows better than God decided to change themselves from the female sex which God created them as to a female who resembles a male on the outside.  If that isn’t a “spectacle” what is?  Michael A. Hoffman writes of a cryptocracy which gains power and influence through its manipulation of symbols and twilight language—the following is along the same spirit.  Returning to the book, we’ll quote from our previous post, Get your barf bags out, on the subject.
The title of the book is 'El Despiste de Dios' which translates into English as 'The Mistake of God' The Spanish word despiste can also mean absentmindedness. The first blurb on the cover reads,"En las criatura imperfectas es donde Dios encuentra toda su grandeza." This translates into English as, "(it is) In the imperfect creature is where God finds his greatness." This quote is from Pedro Almodóvar, who is a Spanish film director whose films are know for transgressing sexual morals boundaries. Notice on the cover the hexegram mitre the two-faced bishop is wearing. It looks just like the one Benedict XVI wore on 11 October 2009 for the canonization ceremony of five new saints.
It has all sorts of kabbalistic magic symbolism on it. This is Talmudic Judaism exaltedly imposing its amoral sexual mores over Christianity. Not only is the two-faced bishop a symbol of the two-faced double-minded God, Janus, but also it is a symbol of rabbinic Judaism's hermaphrodite god. This, taken into account with Naria's sex transformation, is an example of Tikkun Olam being performed in the world as Neria is restored to the prefall hermaphroditic state with male and female reunited. Neria's DNA says she is a female but she appears as a he on the outside. This is the nightmare of a world which the rabbis and, their noahide buddy, Francis want to create.

When a person is a hypocrite, double-dealing, or deceitful we say that they are ‘two-faced’.  Janus is the Roman god of doorways, beginnings, transitions, change, time, war, peace, and endings.  He looks to the past and the future simultaneously.  Isn’t Neria a person who is trying to transition from one sex to another?  Notice on the cover one of the faces of the Janus-like bishop has his eyes closed as if rejecting the past life.

The word hermaphrodite comes into English from the Greek mythology of Hermaphroditos (some say he is a god and others disagree) who was the handsome son of the trickster god Hermes and the beautiful goddess Aphrodite.  Hence, the name Herm-Aproditos equals Hermes-Aphrodite.  Hermaphroditos became a hermaphrodite after the nymph Salmacis prayed to the gods that she be united to Hermaphroditos forever and her prayer was granted.  Hermaphroditos then prayed to his parents that anyone else who bathed in the same waters as he, would be transformed into a hermaphrodite.  This prayer was also granted.  Before this happened both Hermaphroditos and Salmacis were obsessed with their physical appearances.  Both Janus and Hermaphroditos play important roles in alchemy. Can you think of a person who is obsessed with their physical looks?  So much so, that 9 years ago they underwent surgery to change their appearance?  Neria ‘Diego’ Lejárraga seems to fit that description.

And now we come to the miter worn by the bishop on the cover of the above book.  Notice the hexagram, on of the bishop’s miter,  it is also refered to as the Seal of Solomon and is one of the symbols of the House of Rothschild.  The occult uses the hexagram as a sign for androgyny and transformation.  This symbol also comes into play in the rebranding that Francis is putting the Novus Ordo church through.  For Francis is busy correcting what he sees as mistakes in God’s order by inverting God’s order.

The post-conciliar Novus Ordo church is so obsessed with having “dialogue” with Talmudists that it is slowly being transformed by this Kabbalistic sorcery into something which now reflects Rabbinic Judaism’s ideas and immorality.  This is evident in the story of Neria and Francis.

Who “accompanied” Neria on her journey?  The rot extends from the top—Francis all the way down to the bottom—Padre Angel.   Rabbinicism exaults itself over Christianity!  Even the so-called conservative Cardinal Raymond Burke shares this confusion about sex as well as believes in and participates in Talmudic holidays— such as anti-Catholic seder meals.  Don’t worry things will now turn around in the Novus Ordo church because Francis has taken “dialogue” one of the modernist churches pillars which was totally foreign to the Catholic Church before Vatican II to a new level and now extends it to all the Church’s traditional enemies!

A site, Tom Naegle Blogs, recently published a short essay which explains that acts of impurity originate from pride and the path this leads a soul down.
Fornication, Birth Control, Sodomy

These three terrible practices share one common goal, self-gratification.

In fact, any sexual act which is not in conformity with God’s law is simply an act of proud defiance. We like to place ourselves over God. We like to satisfy our own pleasures while ignoring God’s.

We like to make excuses for our disobedience, but its time to admit that all impure acts share essentially the same nature. Each and every one of these terrible crimes is an act of pride–the placing of our own wishes above Almighty God’s.

This means that any poor soul embracing any impure act cannot logically condemn any other impure act. When the principle is established, what follows are just details. The principle of impurity is pride, and the circumstances surrounding the impurity do not much matter.

Any offense against this virtue is always a serious sin.

Francis is embracing people who exhibit these acts everywhere he goes even inviting them to the Vatican.  Never does he correct the sinner and counsel them to repent and reform.  Why does he do this? 

Francis explained in a homily (25 September 2016) that anything goes morally and that God is proclaimed through the “encounter between persons” — a concept straight out of Hasidism.
“It is by loving that the God-who-is-Love is proclaimed to the world: not by the power of convincing, never by imposing the truth, no less by growing fixated on some religious or moral obligation. God is proclaimed through the encounter between persons, with care for their history and their journey.”

Earlier this summer in June, Francis shared another insight into his thinking during another homily,
“It is not Catholic [to say] ‘this or nothing:’ This is not Catholic, this is heretical.”

Again how hypocritical!  Francis only applies this standard to what has been traditionally understood as the Catholic Faith and never to anything else, especially not the Talmudist or their Zionist golem.
 “Anyone who does not recognize the Jewish people and the State of Israel — and their right to exist — is guilty of anti-Semitism.” (source)
“To attack Jews is anti-Semitism, but an outright attack on the State of Israel is also anti-Semitism. There may be political disagreements between governments and on political issues, but the State of Israel has every right to exist in safety and prosperity.” (source)
“...inside every Christian there is a Jew!” (source)

And who can forget this dandy from Francis’ mouth,
“Who am I to judge?”

or in its original context,
“Then you spoke of the gay lobby. Agh… so much is written about the gay lobby. I have yet to find on a Vatican identity card the word gay. They say there are some gay people here. I think that when we encounter a gay person, we must make the distinction between the fact of a person being gay and the fact of a lobby, because lobbies are not good. They are bad. If a person is gay and seeks the Lord and has good will, who am I to judge that person? The Catechism of the Catholic Church explains this point beautifully but says, wait a moment, how does it say, it says, these persons must never be marginalized and “they must be integrated into society.”
The problem is not that one has this tendency; no, we must be brothers, this is the first matter. There is another problem, another one: the problem is to form a lobby of those who have this tendency, a lobby of the greedy people, a lobby of politicians, a lobby of Masons, so many lobbies. This is the most serious problem for me. And thank you so much for doing this question. Thank you very much!”

Isn’t Francis making a judgement by judging that he is not fit to judge the hypothetical homosexual he is speaking of?  Hasn’t Francis judged people who don’t believe in: global warming, Zionism, the Holocaust, recycling, or are members of the mafia? What about all his insults directed at those who love the Catholic Faith?  Such as his complaint about Catholics who sent him a spiritual bouquet of Rosaries or those who attend the Tridentine Latin Mass?  Are those not judgements?  Are they not this-or-that statements which he publicly condemns?

Francis is imposing political correctness on the Novus Ordo straight out of the Hasidic inspired Frankfurt School.  In fact his attack on the traditional understanding of a Catholic family at Synod on the Family and the post-synodal apostolic exhortation Amoris laetitia follows along the same line as Erich Fromm’s.  Francis tips off to those watching which side he is on when he criticizes a Catholic mother for having eight children calling her irresponsible while some time later he meets Rivka Ravitz, a Hasidic mother of eleven children and the chief of staff for the president of Israel, and covers his pectoral cross so as not to offend as well as bows to her with deference.  When was the last time one saw the Frankfurt School critique the rabbis?

By accepting Neria and Macarena as married couple and inviting them to the Vatican Francis is judging that their behavior is satisfactory and moral.  Not once has any mention been made of Francis admonishing Neria for her sinful ways. 

Thomas ‘three Martinis a day’ Rosica, the English language Media Attaché of the Holy See Press Office and the founder/president of Canada’s Pepper + Darkness television station, recently said in a speech,
“He [Francis] IS the new evangelization! You can read all the theoretical texts that there are on the new evangelization. But if you want to see it in Technicolor, look at him.” 

We would correct Rosica only on one small point. To be more truthful “Technicolor” should be read as “Noahide”.  As all of Francis’ un-Catholic ideas come from Orthodox Judaism.  The pattern to readers of this blog should be clear.

This is where Francis’ ‘Jubilee Year of Mercy’ leads — Mercy to those who are sinful and remain in their sinful ways and Severity to those who uphold the Faith given to them by Jesus the Christ.  It’s obvious even to the deaf that Francis rejects Catholic morality and has turned the idea of catholic Mercy on its head.  This is the false Mercy of Francis — it comes from rabbinical Talmudic Judaism and takes one’s soul to eternal perdition.  Who knows better than God and brags about defeating Him in the Talmud(BT Bava Metzia 59B)?  Francis like all revolutionaries is two-faced and like Neria thinks he is correcting the mistakes of God — performing Tikkun Olam.  Pride is also a belief the modernist wallow in — so impressed with themselves as they are.  Ultimately, it goes back to pride and Lucifer.  May God help those on this path which ‘humble’ Francis is leading them.  Please pray that they awake from their spiritual slumber and come learn the Truth — that their Salvation comes not from themselves but from Jesus the Christ.

5 comments:

  1. Many heartfelt thanks for one of the best articles I've ever read on Bergoglio, the church, and our dire situation in this incredible current year. And thanks for mentioning the name of Michael Hoffman, a great writer and prophetic voice who is never ever quoted on any "trad" catholic site that I'm aware of. And may God save us all from the Bergoglian "mercy", which is more than likely some dreadful talmudic curse in disguise.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for the kind words. They are undeserved.

      Delete
  2. God bless you for this fine article. Christ is cruxified again with the help of talmudic judaizers within the church.
    "Trads" are blind to this ugly reality because they don't know any facts about talmudic Judaism. And in my opinion they prefer to stay blind.





    ReplyDelete
  3. Hold it,stop right there you schismatic heretics.
    Bishop Fellay & the SSPX commissars command us to bow before Rabbi Bergoglio and kiss his Bolshevik ring of power.
    (((Sarcasm)))

    ReplyDelete
  4. The state of Israel has no right to exist, it's a state built upon lies and theft of other people's land. Most of the people who live there are atheists and they are the sons of European converts who converted to a false religion invented 135 years after the rise of the church. Babylonian Talmudism is NOT the religion of ancient Israel.Those people are no relation to Moses or the Israelite people. If anyone believes they have a right to rob the Palestinian people just because they are Jews, then I guess you have to believe the Christians also have a right to rob and steal land from Palestinians since their fore fathers were also Jews. This is madness. They only get away with it because of the ignorance of the peoples in the west.

    ReplyDelete