Tuesday, June 20, 2017

update on the new member of the Pontifical Academy Of Life — Rabbi Avraham Steinberg, M.D.




Why did Francis appoint two Talmudic Jews to the Pontifical Academy Of Life?  We at Call Me Jorge... believe the answer is a simple one, it is to further the process of Catholics continuing to look towards the rabbi as the ultimate authority in religion, ethics, and morals.  In this post we will focus on Rabbi Avraham Steinberg and his three-volume, Encyclopedia of Jewish Medical Ethics.  In two recent posts on twitter, by Maurice Pinay and gem, some of the diabolical insanity of the Talmudic religion contained in this work was exposed.  We have those citations below and several others we found while perusing the encyclopedia.  Keep in mind that Francis looks to Rabbi Avraham Steinberg and Talmudic Judaism as authorities.

According to wikipedia,
Rabbi Professor Avraham Steinberg MD (Hebrew אברהם שטינברג; born 25 August 1947) is a medical ethicist, pediatric neurologist, rabbi and editor of Talmudic literature.
Professor Steinberg is Director of the Medical Ethics Unit at Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, and co-chairman of the Israeli National Council on Bioethics. In 1999 he won the Israel Prize for original Rabbinic literature for his 7-volume Encyclopedia Hilchatit Refuit in Hebrew - the most comprehensive text book ever compiled on this subject. It was translated into English by Professor Fred Rosner as the Encyclopedia of Jewish Medical Ethics.[1]
Steinberg is Director of the Torah literature publishing group Yad HaRav Herzog, head of the Editorial Board of the Talmudic Encyclopedia (or Encyclopedia Talmudit) and Editor-in-Chief of the Talmudic Micropedia.



Excerpts from the Encyclopedia of Jewish Medical Ethics: by Rabbi Avraham Steinberg, M.D.





















The above is just a small sampling of the demented minds of the rabbis and their man-made traditions.  For our American readers who are worried about Sharia Law, where’s the concern about the Halakhic Law which is entering the Novus Ordo through the back door with Francis’ recent appointments such as this?  In a previous post we showed how Halakha already influences the American courts (see, R.I.P. Antonin ‘Nino’ Gregory Scalia).  Have the rank-and-file pew sitters been processed to the degree where they think that the above is acceptable to their Christian beliefs?  If not where is the outcry from anyone except for a few ‘voices...crying in the wilderness’ (John 1, 23)?


Related:

7 comments:

  1. Thank you for all of your hard work. All of your research is top drawer. God bless you!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You’re welcome. Thank you for your too kind compliments and for reading the blog!

      Delete
    2. I second the thank you and appreciate all of your hard work @Call Me Jorge
      Thank God we have Sedevacantist chapel 25 mins from home!!!!!

      Delete
  2. What makes me very nervous is this appearance of creating a Pan Religious commission, which to me smells like one world religion warned about in the book of Revelation.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Pontifical Academy for Life is now U.N. One World Church for Death/ Satan yet all the self-labeled "faithful," "prolife" "catholics" will remain in the pews giving their bodies and souls to Satan while keeping their pennies to themselves.

    ReplyDelete
  4. And God created Caitlyn


    http://www.catholicprimer.org/papal/theology_of_the_body.pdf

    Page 8:

    There man is created in one act as male and female. "God created man in his own image...male and female he created them" (Gn 1:27). As we have already mentioned, the second account speaks first of the creation of the man and only afterward of the creation of the woman from the "rib" of the male. This account concentrates our attention on the fact that "man is alone." This appears as a fundamental anthropological problem, prior, in a certain sense, to the one raised by the fact that this man is male and female.

    He does appear to claim that Adam was male and female.  

    Now, man has always known that when God speaks about man He uses man as a synecdoche

    In the last reflection of the present cycle we reached an introductory conclusion, taken from the words of Genesis on the creation of man as male and female ..

    we know this is a synecdoche (man) but Pope Saint John Paul II simply ignores this and presses on to state, flat out, that Adam is male and female.

    He also goes on to teach that Adam revealed himself to himself and so we've also got that going for us which is nice.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. JP2 was a syncretistic heretic.

      Delete