Tuesday, December 12, 2017

Marcantonio Colonna explains why he wrote ‘The Dictator Pope’

excerpts from Life Site News’ interview 
with Marcantonio Colonna

What did you find most interesting, surprising, or shocking in your research?
In fact my book is mainly based on a long series of articles which have already exposed many aspects of Francis's pontificate, but the world's media have preferred to take no notice of them. A personal contribution of mine has been to transmit to the rest of the world the estimate of Bergoglio that had long been held in Argentina. In researching Bergoglio’s past, one of the most significant pieces of evidence I came across was the report written by his religious superior [Father Peter Hans Kolvenbach] in 1991 when it was proposed to make Bergoglio a bishop. The Jesuit General wrote that Bergoglio was not suitable for such an appointment, that he was a man of devious character, lacking psychological balance, and had been a divisive figure as Provincial of the Jesuits in Argentina. The existence of this report has long been known, and I received the account of it from a priest who read the document himself at the time.
What’s your overall view of Pope Francis in light of what you discovered?
My view of Pope Francis is mainly formed from researching his Argentinian background. He emerges as a flawed character, who is capable of impressing people profoundly and forming warm friendships, but who, as one of his priest friends remarked, “manipulates people through the affections.” This characteristic has enabled him to establish a skillful ascendancy over his subordinates in Rome, as he had done previously in Buenos Aires. Bergoglio is also very much the product of the peculiar political culture of Argentina, formed by the populist dictator Juan Perón, of whom Bergoglio was a follower from his early years, and whom he very much resembles in his style of government.
Even some who have praised the book for its thorough research call it tendentious. How do you defend these claims?
My book can only be called tendentious in the sense that it makes a case; but it makes it on the basis of a vast array of facts, which are fairly presented. By contrast, the current public image of Pope Francis is a PR exercise which bears no relation to reality.
The book is well researched and heavily footnoted, but not where you speak of allegations that the Vatican made financial contributions to Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign. Why did you include these allegations in the book?
This accusation was made to me unambiguously by a contact in the Vatican, whose identity I have to protect. However, the allegation is quite well known to journalists. With this and other scandals I mention, my desire was to encourage further investigation by researchers who are better qualified than I am to delve into financial matters.

For the full interview EXCLUSIVE: LifeSite interviews mysterious author of ‘The Dictator Pope’ (click here).



  1. Disinformation, DeMoralization and Distraction engineered by UK Yahudis by putting the spotlight on the St. Gallen Homo. Mafia and not on ¨Frankie the Yid¨ 2000years of Yahudi trickery and we keep falling for it.

    Fake News
    Fake Authors
    Fake Forums
    Fake Blogs
    Fake Pope
    and soon: Fake Peace Proposal by their fake messiah.

    All manufactured by Rand Corp in Jersey Island, et
    Anonymous of the Cross was a such a fake blog run by the same Yahudis who authored this book.
    If Trads fall for their trickery such as Krah, Sochi, and Il Dictator {even the name is misnomer the Pope is a King and the Roman Way is to deligate} what chance do Novus Ordo Catholics have?
    As Adam Sandler said at Sandy Hook Concert ¨We will always rule you¨ No wonder.

  2. Will this informative book be made print-available?