Showing posts with label Italy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Italy. Show all posts

Monday, April 1, 2019

Francis’ solution to problems caused by Vatican II is more liberalism


The insanity continues...





English transcript of Francis’ in-flight 
press conference from Rabat to Rome

Francis: I am thankful for your company, the trip, your work. It was challenging because one day and a half and so many things, right? And thank you for your work and now I am at your service.

Alessandro Gisotti: Clearly, as always, as is tradition, we start with the local media. Siham Toufiki, do you want to ask the question in English, as you like.

Siham Toufiki, MAP: I will ask in French … There were very powerful moments. This visit was exceptional, historic for the Moroccan people. What are the consequences of this visit for the future, for world peace, for coexistence in the dialogue between cultures?
Francis: I will say that now there are flowers, the fruits will come later, but the flowers are promising. I am happy because in these two journeys I have been able to talk much about what is in my heart -- peace, unity, fraternity. With Muslim brothers and sisters, we sealed this fraternity in the Abu Dhabi document, and here in Morocco, with this we have all seen a freedom, a welcome, all brothers with such great respect, and this beautiful flower of coexistence, a beautiful flower that is promising to bear fruit.
We must not give up. It is true that there will be still be difficulties. There will be many difficulties because unfortunately there are fundamentalist groups. This too, I would like to say clearly: in every religion there are always fundamentalist groups, who do not want to go forward and [who] live with bitter memories of past struggles and seek more war and also sow fear; and we have seen that it is more beautiful to sow hope. Sowing hope is holding hands, always forward.

We have seen, even in the dialogue with you here in Morocco that bridges are needed, and we feel pain when we see people who prefer to build walls. Why do we feel sad? Because those who build walls will end up being prisoners of the walls they build. Instead, those who build bridges will go forward. Building bridges, for me, is something that goes almost beyond human because it takes great effort.

I was very touched by a sentence in the novel, “The Bridge on the Drina,” by Ivo Andrić. He says that the bridge is made by God with the wings of angels so that men can communicate … so that men can communicate. The bridge is for human communication. And this is beautiful and I saw it here in Morocco. It is beautiful. Instead of walls that are against communication -- they are for isolation and those that build them will become prisoners of those walls. So, a summary: the fruits are not seen, but we see so many flowers that will bear fruit. Let’s move forward like this.

Gisotti: Holy Father, Nicolas Seneze from La Croix will now ask his question, perhaps Cristina Cabrejas can get closer so that we save time.

Nicolas Seneze, La Croix: Good evening, Holy Father. Yesterday the King of Morocco said he will protect Jewish Moroccans, and Christians from other countries who live in Morocco. This begs the question: what about the Muslims who convert to Christianity? I wanted to know if you are concerned about these men and women, who risk prison, or death in some Muslim countries, like the Emirates, which you visited. And also a question that is a bit sneaky, which is about Cardinal Barbarin, who was born in Rabat, which you visited for two days.
Francis: And a question?

Seneze: It is a bit tricky, I know, but this week the councils of the Diocese of Lyon voted almost unanimously that a lasting solution be found to his retirement (leave of absence). Setting aside {inaudible} of the cardinal, I wanted to know if it is possible for you, who are very attached to the synodality of the Church, to hear this appeal of a diocese that has such a difficult situation? Thank you.

Francis: The first was what?

Seneze: Muslims who convert to Christianity.

Francis: I can say that in Morocco there is freedom of worship, there is religious liberty, there’s liberty of belonging to a religious creed. Then, freedom always develops, it grows. Think of us Christians 300 years ago, if there was this freedom that we have today. The faith grows in the awareness, the ability to understand itself. A monk from among you, a Frenchman, Vincent of Lérins, in the 9th or 8th century [Ed. 5th century] coined a beautiful expression to explain how you can grow in the faith, better explain things, grow also in morality, but also remaining faithful to your roots. He said three words that precisely mark the way. He said that growing in explication and in understanding of the faith and morality must be “annis scilicet consolidetur, dilatetur tempore, sublimetur aetate,” that is, it must be strengthened in years, enlarged in time, but it is the same faith, and sublimated in years.

So, we understand, for example, that today we in the Church have removed the death penalty from the Catechesim of the Catholic Church. Three hundred years ago, heretics were burned alive. Because the Church has grown in moral conscience, respect for the person, and freedom of worship. We too must continue to grow. There are people, Catholics, who do not accept what the Second Vatican Council said about freedom of worship, freedom of conscience. There are people who don’t accept it. Catholics. Also we have this problem. But, the Muslim brothers also grow in conscience. In some countries, they don’t understand well or they don’t grow like in others.

In Morocco, there is this growth. In this frame, there is the problem of conversion, some countries still don’t see it. I don’t know if it’s prohibited, but the practice is prohibited. Some countries like Morocco don’t make problems - they’re more open, more respectful, they seek a certain way of proceeding with discretion. Other countries with whom I’ve spoken say, “We have no problem, but we prefer they do the baptism outside of the country and they return Christians.” But, there are ways of progressing in the freedom of religion and the freedom of worship.

But something else is concerning to me: the regression of us Christians when we take away freedom of conscience. Think of the Christian doctors and hospital institutions that do not have the right of conscientious objection, for example, for euthanasia. How? The Church has moved on and you Christian countries go backwards? Think of this because it is a truth. Today, we Christians have the danger that some governments will take away our freedom of conscience, which is the first step toward freedom of worship. The response isn’t easy. But, let’s not accuse Muslims. Let’s accuse ourselves also in these countries where this happens. It is a shame.

Then, on Cardinal Barbarin. He, a man of the Church, has submitted his resignation, but morally I cannot accept it because juridically, but also in the classic global jurisprudence, there is a presumption of innocence during the time the cause is open. He made an appeal and the cause is still open. Then, when the second tribunal gives its verdict, we’ll see what happens. But, he always is to have the presumption of innocence. This is important because it goes against the superficial media condemnation. What does the global jurisprudence say? “He did this.” But look, what does the judge say, what does the global jurisprudence say? That if a case is open, there is the presumption of innocence. Maybe he is not innocent, but there is the presumption.

Many times… Once I talked about this problem referring to Spain, how the media condemnation ruined the lives of some priests who were then judged innocent. Before making a media condemnation, think twice. I don’t know if I answered. And, [Barbarin] preferred, honestly… “I will retire away, take a voluntary leave and let the vicar general manage the diocese until the moment the tribunal makes a final decision.” Understood? Thank you.

Gisotti: Okay, I ask you all for brevity and just one question to respect all of the language groups. There is Cristina Cabrejas of EFE that asks her question, meanwhile Michael Schram of ARD if he can prepare. Please, Cristina.

Cristina Cabrejas, EFE: Good evening, Pope Francis. I will ask the question in Italian. In yesterday's speech to the authorities, you said that the migration phenomenon is not resolved with physical barriers, but here in Morocco, Spain has built two barriers with sharp blades to cut those who want to overcome it. You met some of them in a few meetings and President Trump these days said he wants to completely close the borders and suspend aid to three Central American countries.

Francis: First of all, what I said a moment ago, the builders of walls, whether made of barbed wire that cuts with knives or bricks, will become prisoners of the walls they make. First. History will show this.

Secondly, Jordi Evole, when he interviewed me, he showed me a piece of that wire with the knives. I’ll tell you sincerely, I was moved. Then, when he left I cried. I cried because so much cruelty doesn’t enter into my heart and my head. Watching people drown in the Mediterranean doesn’t enter into my heart and my head, blocking ports doesn’t enter. This isn’t the way to solve the grave problem of immigration. I understand, a government with this problem has a “hot potato” that needs to be resolved in another way.

When I saw that wire, with knives, It seemed like I couldn't believe it. Then, once I had the chance to see a video of the prison of refugees that return, that are sent back. Unofficial prisons, prisons among many traffickers. If you want, I can send [the video] to you. But they make suffering, they make suffering. They sell women and children there, the men remain. And the tortures that are seen filmed there are unbelievable. It was a film made in secret, with services. Here I do not let enter: It is right because I have no place, but there are other countries, there is the humanity of the European Union. We must talk about the whole European Union. I do not let them in, or let them drown there, or send them away knowing that so many of them will fall into the hands of these traffickers who will sell women and children, kill or torture to enslave men. This video is at your disposal.

I once spoke to a politician, a man that I respect and I will say the name: Alexis Tsipras. And speaking of this and the accords not to let [migrants] in, he explained the difficulties to me, but in the end, he spoke to me from the heart and said this phrase: 'human rights are before accords.' This sentence deserves the Nobel Prize.

Gisotti: Here, the question is now addressed by Michael Schramm of the German ARD, and Cristiana Caricato is preparing, thank you.

Michael Schramm, ARD Roma: Your Holiness, I have to apologize, my Italian is not good. Sorry. My question: You have been fighting or many years to protect and help migrants, as you did in the last few days in Morocco. European politics goes exactly in the opposite direction. Europe becomes like a rod against migrants. This policy reflects the opinion of voters. The majority of these voters are Catholic Christians. How do you feel about this sad situation?

Francis: I see that many people of good will, not only Catholics, but good people, of good will, are a little gripped by the fear that is the usual sermon of populism: fear. Sowing fear and then making decisions. Fear is the beginning of dictatorships. Let's go to the last century, to the fall of the Weimar empire [Republic]. I repeat this a lot. Germany needed an exit and, with promises and fears, Hitler went ahead. We know the result. We learn from history, this is not new: To sow fear is to make a harvest of cruelty, closures, and even sterility. Think of the demographic winter of Europe. Even we who live in Italy: under zero. Think of the lack of historical memory: Europe was made by migration and this is its riches. We think of the generosity of so many countries, which today are knocking at the door of Europe, with European migrants from '84 onwards, the two post-war periods, en masse, North America, Central America, South America. My father went there in the post-war period, in welcome. Even Europe could have a little gratitude, it is true. true. To be understanding I will say two things. It is true that the first work we should make is to try to ensure that people who migrate for war or for hunger do not have this need. But if Europe, so generous, sells arms to Yemen [used] to kill children, how can Europe be coherent? I say: this is an example, but Europe sells weapons. Then there is the problem of hunger, thirst. Europe, if it wants to be the mother Europe and not the grandmother Europe, must invest, must try intelligently to help to lift up [people] with education, with investments, (this is not mine, Chancellor Merkel said it). It is something that she carries forward well enough.

To prevent immigration not by force, but by generosity, educational investments, economic investments, etc. This is very important. Second thing about this: how to act. It is true that a country cannot receive everyone, but there is all of Europe to distribute migrants to, there is all of Europe. Because hospitality must be open-hearted, then accompany, promote, and integrate. If a country cannot integrate [migrants] it must immediately think of speaking with other countries: how much you can integrate to give a dignified life to the people.

Another example that I lived in my flesh in the time of dictatorships, the Condor operation in Buenos Aires, Latin America, Argentina, Chile and Uruguay. It was Sweden that received people, with an impressive generosity.

They immediately learned the language at the expense of the state, they found work, a home. Now Switzerland feels a little difficulty to integrate [migrants], but she says it and asks for help.

When I was in Lund last year, or the other year, I do not remember, the prime minister welcomed me, but in the farewell ceremony it was a minister, a young minister, I believe in education. She was a bit brunette, because she is the daughter of a Swede and an African migrant. Thus is how a country I put as an example, Sweden, integrates [migrants]. But this takes generosity, the desire to move forward. With fear we will not move forward, with walls we will remain closed in these walls. I am giving a sermon, sorry.

Gisotti: There is now the question of Cristiana Caricato of TV2000 and we'll see if we can then ask the last question.

Cristiana Caricato, TV2000: Holy Father, you have just noted fears and the risk of dictatorships that these fears can generate. Just today, an Italian minister, referring to the Verona conference, said that more than the family, one must be afraid of Islam. You have been saying something else for years now. In your opinion, are we at risk of dictatorship in our country [Italy]? According to you, it is the result of prejudice, of not knowing, what do you think? And then a curiosity: you often denounce the action of the devil, you did so also at the recent [Vatican summit on abuse]. It seems to me that in the last period he is very active, the devil has given himself much to do lately, also in the Church. In your opinion, what should be done to counter him, especially with regard to pedophilia scandals? Are laws enough? Why is the devil so active right now?

Francis: Very good. Thank you for the question. A newspaper said, after my speech at the end of the summit of presidents [of bishops' conferences]: The pope was sneaky. First he said that pedophilia is a global problem, then he said something about the Church, in the end he washed his hands and blamed the devil. A bit 'simplistic' isn't it? That speech is clear. A French philosopher, in the '70s, had made a distinction that gave me a lot of light. He was called [unclear recording]. He gave me a hermeneutical light. He said: to understand a situation you have to give all the explanations and then look for the meanings. What does it mean socially? What does it mean personally or religiously?

I try to give you all the explanations and also the limits of the explanations. But there is a point that cannot be understood without the mystery of evil. Think of this: virtual child pornography. There were two heavy meetings [on this topic], one in Rome and the other in Abu Dhabi. I wonder: Why did this become a daily thing? Why, I'm talking about serious statistics, how come if I wanted to see child sexual abuse, live, you can connect with virtual child pornography, they make it. Look, I'm not telling lies. It is in the statistics. I wonder: Cannot the people responsible for public order do anything? We in the Church will do everything to finish with this plague, we will do it all. And in that speech I gave concrete measures. And they already were, before the summit, when the conference presidents gave me that list I gave to all of you [Ed. 21 ‘reflection points’]. But are the perpetrators of this filth innocent? Those who earn money from this? In Buenos Aires, with two parliamentarians from the city, not from the national government, we made an order, it is not a law, but a non-binding provision for luxury hotels, where it was said 'put in the reception: in this hotel amusement (relationships) with minors is not allowed.' No one wanted to put it. 'No, but you know, you cannot, it looks like we are dirty, we do not allow it, but without the sign.' A government, for example, cannot identify where the video of this [abuse] is [taking place], where are these things done with children? All filmed live. This is to say that the global scourge is great, but also to say that this is not understood without the spirit of evil. It is a concrete problem. We must solve it concretely, but say that it is the spirit of evil.

And to solve this there are two publications that I recommend: one that is an article by Gianni Valente in Vatican Insider where he talks about the Donatists. The danger of the Church today of becoming Donatist by doing all [with] human provisions, that which must be done, but only these, forgetting the other dimensions: prayer, penance, the accusation of one's self, which we are not used to doing. Both! Because to overcome the spirit of evil is not 'washing one's hands,' saying 'the devil does it,' no. We too must struggle with the devil, as we must struggle with human things.

The other publication is one that they did... you, La Civilta Cattolica. I wrote a book in 1987, “The Letters of Tribulation”, they were letters from the Jesuit fathers general of that time, when the society was going to be dissolved, and I wrote a prologue. And these [people] studied this and they found a study on the letters that I wrote to the Chilean episcopate and to the people of Chile, how to act in this, the two parts, the human, scientific part to go ahead and against, the legal part as well, and then the spiritual part.

The same thing I did with the bishops of the United States, because the proposals were too much of an organization, of methodologies, a bit without meaning to, but it had neglected this second spiritual dimension, with the laity, with everyone.

I want to tell you, the Church isn’t a congregationalist church, it’s a Catholic Church where the bishop takes this into hand as a shepherd, “the Pope has to take this in hand,” but how does he take it in hand? With disciplinary measures, with prayer, penance, the accusation of one’s self. In that letter that I wrote them before they began their spiritual exercises, there was also this dimension well explained. I would be grateful if you were to study both things: the human part and also the part of the spiritual fight.

Gisotti: No, we have truly exceeded the time, I'm sorry, but it is a press conference that has become longer than that...

Caricato: The question is whether even in Italy we are at risk of dictatorship.
Francis: Really, I do not understand Italian politics. I do not understand. Yesterday, I passed [on the plane] Franca [Giansoldati]. I had read in Espresso about this Family Day. I said [to Giansoldati] you didn't write it? What do you think of Family Day? I don't know what it is, really I know it's one of the many days that [Italians] have. I also know, I said to her, that I read the letter sent by Cardinal Parolin and I agree. A pastoral, polite letter from a pastor's heart. But don't ask me about Italian politics, I don't understand.

Gisotti: I'm sorry, as I told you, we are really, absolutely, out of time. There is only really a minute for a little surprise for two colleagues who had birthdays yesterday: Phil Pulella and Gerry O'Connell, two great colleagues and this is a small gift from the community of your colleagues and all of us.


source: Full text of Pope Francis' in-flight press conference from Rabat, Catholic News Agency, 31 March 2019.

Francis said we are seeing, the “flowers” of dialogue and that, “the fruits will come later”.

Wednesday, January 9, 2019

the new evangelization — it’s pizza time!


Cardinal Crescenzio Sepe opens the door of the Cathedral Church to 600 people — the poor, the homeless, and the unemployed



Cardinal Sepe calls it the “Solidarity Dinner”



Nothing tells God you love him more than turning his cathedral into a dining hall!




It’s an ‘old tradition’...


Here they are in 2011...
 


...in 2016
 


...in 2017
 


At least the Neapolitans will be pleased that Sepe served pizza!

How Francis spent his 80th birthday in 2016


Celebrating with his 


Talmudic & Kabbalist friends!



(click images to enlarge)

 The international delegation from Menora and the birthday boy at Casa Santa Marta.


Rabbi Isaac Sacca is the Senior Rabbi of the Sephardic Jews in Argentina & the founder and president of Menora, Organización Judía Mundial para la Juventud (Menora, World Jewish Organization for Youth).  The purpose of Menora is to spread the Talmud and the Kabbalah among the Jewish youth of the world by educating them about their powers.  Sacca brought a group of his fellow Talmudic Jews who back his causes to the Vatican to meet with Francis as well as celebrate his 80th birthday with a kosher cake, of course! This post from Sacca’s website explains it:



Pope Francis received Rabbi Isaac Sacca and an international delegation from Menorah, with representatives from Argentina, the United States, England and Italy. 
For more than an hour, they discussed, among other things, about the idea of ​​Argentina exporting to the world its capacity for harmony and peace among different faiths. They also talked on education initiatives for tolerance and respect among peoples and different action plans to make the society noble, just and inclusive. 
Rabbi Sacca gave Pope Francis a replica of the Birkat Kohanim (Blessing of Priests) from the oldest Bible found. 
The colored note was the kosher cake that Rabbi Sacca and the delegation of Menora presented to the Pope for his birthday, which read: H.H. Pope Francis Happy Birthday. 
Pope Francis gave each guest a coin of the Jubilee. 
It has been another unforgettable encounter between Pope Francis and Rabbi Sacca, two religious who seek to leave a message of hope to the world, based on deep knowledge, infinite merciful faith, sincere respect and a proactive action for the common good.

Expected meeting between Pope Francis and the Chief Rabbi Isaac Sacca, Isaac Sacca.com, 16 December 2016


In 1979 Gabriel Barkay found two tiny silver scroll amulets with different versions of the Birkat Hakohanim dating back to the 7th century B.C. at the Ketef Hinnom archaeological site southwest of the Old City of Jerusalem, Israel.  Above is a photograph of the scroll KH2 with transcription of its letters. 

A unidentified Orthodox Jew performing the Birkat Hakohanim.

The two old friends probably also discussed Halaka.

Francis must have been tickled pink to have received a replica of the Birkat Kohanim.

They had to celebrate the birthday one day early because it fell on the Jewish Sabbath.

Don’t worry it was kosher and from Francis’ favorite Jewish restaurant in Rome, Ba’Ghetto.




More on Rabbi Isaac Sacca:

Tuesday, October 9, 2018

The Circus Maximus is used for pagan fun and games again!


Immodesty was out in full force.


(click images to enlarge — censored with black, green, and yellow colors)

Nothing says one loves Francis than dressing immodestly.

‘Give me a spiritual hug Francis!’

The adoring crowd came out to see their revolutionary hero!

Guys got in on the immodest dress as well.

Even the handicap participated in the immodesty. Did Francis kiss this guy?

Stick your tongue out like Kali and take a selfie!

‘We want Francis the Most Humble!’

We wonder would this same crowd be cheering him if the event took place two weeks later?

Got to get a selfie with the ‘King of Selfies’

Do the Italian youth today still adore Francis the head of the Gay Mafia?


Francis met with an announced mob of 70,000 youth (in reality around 30,000) on 11 August 2018 at the Circus Maximus for some Novus Ordo fun, under the guise of a prayer meeting!



Francis also got this wooden staff (which many are calling a stang) to add to his collection of ferulas which mock the Catholic Faith and Our Lord’s Crucifixion.

Close-up of the ugly crozier.

Thursday, August 2, 2018

the new evangelization — the Germans invade Rome!


Watch the youth of Germany go on a sacrilegious pilgrimage.  The reader is forewarned, this video has it all:  immodest dress, female altar boys, rock 'n roll music, neon lights, hats in church, flag waving, clapping, etc... It’s one giant Novus Ordo mess as San Giovanni in Laterano is desecrated.




(The mayhem starts at 19 minutes & 39 seconds.)




Friday, June 15, 2018

Vatican spokesman explains why Cardinal Parolin attended Bilderberg Group


...to take Francis’ Yiddish Gospel to the ‘peripheries’


Cardinal Pietro Parolin, the Vatican Secretary of State, accepted an invitation to address the controversial and secretive Bilderberg Meeting earlier this month in order to take the teaching of the Church to a group who would not otherwise hear it, a Vatican spokesman has told the Register. 
The spokesman said Italian organizers of the visit were persistent in extending an invitation to the most senior Vatican official after Pope Francis to this year’s event, which took place June 7-10 in Turin, Italy. “The cardinal decided to take part after the Italian organizers very insistently invited him to the meeting six months ago,” the spokesman explained. “He thought about it for a long time and, after consulting the necessary people, he decided to go.” 
[...] 
In his June 15 comments to the Register, the Vatican spokesman stressed that Parolin “did not ask to go” to the event, but decided to attend after a “long process of consultation.” He said he did not know why the organizers were so insistent, except that it was probably because Pope Francis is an “important voice” on the world stage. 
The Vatican Secretary of State was there for a “short time — about an hour and three quarters,” he disclosed, during which the cardinal gave an address about the “social doctrine of the Church” followed by a question and answer session. 
The Pope was certainly aware of the cardinal’s participation, the spokesman said, and that the cardinal was “fully aware of the controversial nature” of the event but felt encouraged by having already met many of the participants in “other contexts.” 
“He already knew some of the people, prime ministers and so on,” the spokesman said. 
[...] 
The Vatican spokesman brushed off concerns about the secretive nature of the event, saying that the Chatham House Rule is well known and widely used. “Various other meetings have the same rules,” he said. The Bilderberg Meeting says participants are free to discuss the meeting and do so every year, but they are asked not to quote each other. 
Some have speculated that this year’s event was to discuss how to thwart rising nationalist and populist movements, seen most clearly in the election of President Donald Trump, Brexit, and the recent elections in Italy which saw two populist parties gain power. 
The Vatican spokesman said he “could not say anymore” on the issue, reiterating that the cardinal was there “simply to convey Catholic social teaching” and to take “the voice of the Church to people who wouldn’t otherwise hear it.” 
Although the spokesman wasn’t present with the cardinal, he said he believed his speech and remarks were “very well received.” 
The Register contacted the Bilderberg Meeting to ask why the organizers were so insistent on having the cardinal participate and whether it seeks to promote a globalist agenda, but it has not yet responded.

excerpted from, Spokesman Explains Why Cardinal Parolin Attended Bilderberg Meeting by Edward Pentin, National Catholic Register, 15 June 2018.


Related:

Saturday, February 17, 2018

Msgr. Pietro Amenta, bishop of Matera and member of the Vatican’s Roman Rota, pleads guilty to possession of 80 photos of child pornography


(click images to enlarge)


The happy day that the troubled prelate, Msgr. Pietro 
Amenta, became a member of the Roman Rota.


The Roman Rota is the highest appellate tribunal of the Roman Catholic Church. The Roman Rota’s official records begin in A.D. 1171 however the famous Constitution of John XXII, Ratio Juris (16 December 1331) which lays out the form of the oath of office for the auditors and notaries of the Rota is considered by some historians as the beginning of the appellate tribunal.  Either way, the Church’s legal system is still the oldest in the West in use.  The Roman Rota judges by turns of three auditors and is essentially a court of appeal.  The cases before the Roman Rota  consist of litigation and criminal cases (excluding those reserved to the pope) and its jurisdiction extends over both citizens of the Vatican City and the faithful from all over the world.  Many of the cases before them deal with matrimonial nullity or annulments.


 The moral perversion and rot goes all the way to the top in the Vatican.


On 19 November 2012, Pietro Amenta was sworn in as a member of the Roman Rota (see photos).  This appointment was carried out under the supposed hard-liner Benedict XVI.  We say supposed because Amenta was known at the time by the Carabinieri (Italian police) as the subject for a complaint of obscene acts in 1991 and for sexual harassment in 2004.  Shortly after being sworn in, Amenta filed a complaint with the Carabinieri after being robbed by two transsexuals.


 The homosexual pedophile putting his robes on.


Which bring us to the night of 2 March 2017 when an eighteen year old Romanian escorted his girlfriend to the Piazza San Giovanni di Dio, in the Monteverde, Gianicolense neighborhood in Rome for her evening classes.  While waiting for the school to dismiss, the Romanian went to a nearby market where Msgr. Amenta grabbed him by the genitals.  The Romanian complained but the prelate repeated the gesture again.  This rightfully set the Romanian off who began to complain loudly and Amenta proceeded to apologize explaining that there wasn’t much room between the stalls.  The Romanian, rightfully, wasn’t satisfied with this answer and told Amenta he wanted this incident reported to the police.  At this point Pietro Amenta said, “You do not know who I am...” and then fled the scene.  The Romanian gave chase and both were caught by an off duty municipal officer who then called the Carabinieri.  After the Carabinieri arrived they questioned both men and based on a clean record and a believable story let the Romanian go and detained Amenta.  The following day Msgr. Pietro Amenta’s home was searched.  In this search the Carabinieri found 80 pornographic photos with under age children as the subject matter on his computer.  When confronted with this evidence, Pietro denied having downloaded them.  He later changed his story, plead guilty in a plea bargain with the Italian court system.  Two days ago, Amenta was given a suspended sentence of one year and two months for two charges, one of sexual assault and the other, possession of digital child pornography.


How many other sodomite perverts sit as judges on the Roman Rota?


This is the second case in the past year involving a Vatican official in possession of child pornography.  The other was Msgr. Carlo Alberto Capella, who worked in the nunciature of Washington, D.C..  Which bring us to humble Francis and his ‘zero-tolerance’ policy.  Unless Francis takes some action and soon, his self vaunted ‘zero-tolerance’ policy will be seen for what it truly is, ‘zero-tolerance’ for anyone who brings forth evidence of presiders committing acts of homosexual sodomy.  This shouldn’t come as a surprise, as what message has Francis been sending to the world when he has knowingly promoted and surrounded himself with homosexuals?  The unwritten message is that Francis too, belongs to this morally degenerate club.


Sources used for post:


***** UPDATE 22 FEBRUARY 2018 *****


Bp. Pietro Amenta resigns from serving as a judge of the Roman Rota





Tuesday, September 19, 2017

Francis says ‘global warming is a fact!’


‘Those who deny global warming are stupid!’


‘It’s no joke!’



and as if on cue...




 (underlines are ours for emphasis)
Anomalous cold, rain and snow: + 12 ° C in the daytime on the coast of the Adriatic, Italy seems already winter!
Cold weather, as if we were in the winter. At 13:00 we have just + 10 ° C in Udine and Belluno, + 12 ° C in Venice, Trieste, Ravenna and Trento, + 13 ° C in Bologna, Padua, Vicenza, Ravenna and Pordenone, + 14 ° C in Ancona . Maximum temperatures are thus typical of December or March. And there are rains and thunderstorms, especially in the north / east, in Emilia Romagna, Tuscany, Marche, Umbria, Lazio and the coasts of Campania, extending to the south in the next few hours. Temperatures will decrease further. There will be a possible intense storms tonight between Abruzzo, Molise and Gargano, tomorrow's bad weather along the Adriatic Regions and the South in the low Tyrrhenian Sea, between Calabria and Sicily, for the cold front to come down here.
Meanwhile in the Eastern Alps it is snowing from 1,400 / 1,500 meters in altitiude, and next night the snow may drop to more or less the same altitude on the central Apennines, especially between Marche, Umbria, Abruzzo and Molise. Just tomorrow, Wednesday 20 September, will be the coldest day. Just a few hours from the equinox, in the fall, the middle season seems to have already passed to project us in the winter. But winter is still very far away, and to fade away the memory of the asphyxiating heat of recent months, it will still take a long time.




Don’t you hate it when anomalies happen 
and make a mess of your narrative?


Thursday, July 6, 2017

Francis re-defrocks fellow Novus Ordo priest in the name of defending Orthodox Judaism


The re-defrocked priest Mauro Inzoli (aka ‘Don Mercedes’).


Early in his reign, Francis made it known publicly that he had “zero tolerance” for the sexual abuse of minors from his prelates including covering up the crime.  This sounds great but in practice Francis has been shown to be lenient to the extreme in sexual abuse cases.  In fact, Francis promoted one of his bishops, Juan Barros Madrid, who covered-up the sex crimes of Fr. Fernando Karadima to another bishopric.  One can read but a few of these cases which demonstrate Francis’ cognitive dissonance by clicking here.

Recently, Francis defrocked or we should write re-defrocked one Mauro Inzoli, also known by the sarcastic nickname of ‘Don Mercedes’ due to his passion for expensive cars.  So what exactly is Mauro Inzoli’s story?  In 2012, Inzoli was accused of being a pedophile and investigated by the Vatican.  He is a high ranking member of Communion & Liberation movement (C & L), in charge of an important Food Bank, vice-president of the Company of good works for C & L, confessor to more than one Italian Senator, and member of a traditional family conference (which was accused of being homophobic).  Benedict XVI found the charges credible and defrocked Mauro Inzoli.  The Vatican then began to cooperate with the prosecuting civil authorities in the cases.  The year is now 2013, Benedict XVI resigns and Francis is elected, a new sheriff is in town.  In 2014, Francis undoes the defrocking of Mauro Inzoli and warns him “to stay away from children and retire to "a life of prayer and humble discretion."”  Cooperation with the prosecutors in Cremona stops as the Vatican and the diocese of Crema withhold promised documents.    His friends Msgr. Pio Vito Pinto and Cardinal Francesco Coccopalmerio are pleased with these actions.  Regardless, Inzoli is found guilty in May 2016 in “the Italian court of eight counts of sexual abuse of children aged 12 to 16.  He reportedly paid $28,000 in compensation to five victims he molested between 2004 and 2008.”  These abuses took place during “confessions, while they [Inzoli and the children] were away together on summer and winter camps, and even in hospital.”  The judge Letizia Plate ordered Inzoli to “pay 125,000 € ($142,000) in compensation to the families of his victims.” Judge Plate was said to have “said the psychological trauma suffered by the children was aggravated by the fact some families refused to believe the stories of abuse by Inzoli, who was known for his charming manner.”  Inzoli is currently in prison serving a sentence of four years and nine months.  On Wednesday 28 June 2017 the diocese of Crema, in which Mauro Inzoli belonged, announces that Francis has defrocked him on 20 May 2017 reversing his earlier decision.


 “Who am I to judge?”



So why did Francis recently re-defrock Mauro Inzoli?  It wasn’t because of the abuses perpetrated.  It was due to what came out during the trial.   The title of the The Times of Israel’s article, ‘Pope defrocks pedophile priest who claimed abuse was old Jewish ritual’, says it all.  One of the victims testifies about what happened in 1996 (when he was a child), that Inzoli “touched him during confession” and when the victim asked Inzoli for an explanation of the sexual act, he explained it, “by referring to a sort of ‘baptism of the testicles’ that he then presented as Jewish ritual mentioned in the Old Testament as a sign of the affection between father and son.”  How perverted and disgusting!

Past readers of this blog know that when it comes to Our Lord, Jesus the Christ, Francis is always uttering blasphemies and mocking His crucifixion.  When it comes to the Holocaust, Talmudic Jewish religious festivities, and even anything having to do remotely with the rabbis, Francis is all business.  Francis has even said, “Many dress up as Christians but are not really Christians.”  How apt!  Jesus the Christ said, “Beware of false prophets, who come to you in the clothing of sheep, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves. By their fruits you shall know them...so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit, and the bad tree bringeth forth bad fruit...Wherefore by their fruits you shall know them.” (Matthew 7, 15-20)

The key difference between the myriad of cases where Francis has decided not to judge & defrock priests and the case of Mauro Inzoli was simply what one of the victims said on the witness stand.  The English speaking  Novus Ordo religious media has not reported on this one aspect because it is an embarrassment to their bosses.  The Israeli media has said of the testimony, “There is no such ritual in the Old Testament or in Judaism.”  Why then is there an unspoken tradition of sexually abusing minors in Orthodox Judasim?  Many yeshivas of the ‘elder brothers’ are rife with pederasty.  In March of this year, twenty Orthodox males in Jerusalem were arrested for sexually abusing children.  Why does the Encyclopedia of Jewish Medical Ethics by Rabbi Avraham Steinberg, who was recently appointed by Francis to the Pontifical Academy of Life, say that it is okay for a man to have sexual relations with a boy under the age of nine?  Where there is smoke, there is fire. 



Don’t think for one instance that this makes the Novus Ordo any less culpable for its deviant behavior.  We are only pointing out why Inzoli was defrocked by Francis — it wasn’t for the crimes he committed but for what came out in the Cremora court.  The Church has long had a problem with pederasty which St. Peter Damian wrote of, all the back in A.D. 1051 almost one-thousand years ago, in his work, Liber Gomorrhianus (Book of Gomorrah).  This problem is most infamously known in our era with the papacies of John Paul II and Benedict XVI looking the other way in exchange for bags of money while Marcial Maciel and others like him committed their heinous crimes.

Just know that is okay for Francis to judge his child abusing priests only when he has to defend his beloved Orthodox Judaism.



Wednesday, June 28, 2017

Cardinal George Pell charged with at least three serious sex assault charges, including at least one count of rape


&

 a drug fueled homosexual orgy 
 at Palazzo del Sant'Uffizio


Cardinal George Pell serves as the inaugural and current Prefect of the Secretariat for the Economy since being appointed to the position by Francis in 2014.  He is the third most senior person serving in the Vatican bureaucracy.  Pell denies all charges and looks forward to his day in court.  When asked in August 2016 about Pell and the alleged crimes, Francis said, “But, we must wait for justice and not make a first judgement ourselves, a media trial, or...because this doesn't help. The judgement of gossip and then, one can...we don't know what the result will be but be attentive to what justice decides. Once justice speaks, I will speak. Thank you.”


 Victoria police charge Cardinal Pell with multiple sexual offenses


&




In a related story, Il Fatto Quotidiano - Vaticano, fermato un monsignore: festini gay e droga al Palazzo dell’ex Sant’Uffizio, is reporting that the gendarmerie of the Holy See caught red-handed a monsignor in an apartment in the palace of the former Holy Office participating in homosexual drug fueled orgy.  The anonymous monsignor serves as secretary for an important cardinal of the Roman Curia who heads one of its departments.  He was sent to detoxify from drugs at the Pius XI clinic in Rome and has now been spirited off to a convent where he is on retreat.  This monsignor also used a car with the diplomatic license plates of the Holy See to transport drugs.  It was reported as well, that he was soon to be promoted to the rank of bishop.  When Francis was notified of the monsignor being caught in the act he was “enraged”.  One of the monsignor’s fellow priests said, “He had proposed his secretary for the episcopate.  Luckily they have not made him a bishop.  Now imagine what could have happened?”

Monday, May 29, 2017

Once again, Francis is dumbfounded at why children suffer.


“Perché la sofferenza dei bambini è certamente la più dura da accettare; e allora il Signore mi chiama a stare, anche se brevemente, vicino a questi bambini e ragazzi e ai loro familiari. Tante volte mi faccio e mi rifaccio la domanda: perché soffrono i bambini? E non trovo spiegazione. Solo guardo il Crocifisso e mi fermo lì.”
source: Vaticano, Incontro con i bambini dei vari reparti all'Ospedale Pediatrico, Parole del Francesco (English translation below the video)




(the quoted Italian begins at 49 min & ends at 49 min 43 sec)


— English translation —


“Because the suffering of children is certainly the most difficult to accept; and then the Lord calls me to stay, albeit briefly, nearby with these children and their families. So many times I make, and I refer the question: why children suffer? And I find no explanation.  I only look at the Crucifix and I stop there.”



Recall during his visit January 2015 visit to the Philippines when Francis was asked by a tearful 12 year old former street child, Glyzelle Palomar, “Many children are abandoned by their parents. Many children get involved in drugs and prostitution. Why does God allow these things to happen to us? The children are not guilty of anything.” And Francis answered, “She is the only one who has put a question for which there is no answer and she wasn’t even able to express it in words but in tears. The nucleus of your question … almost doesn’t have a reply.”  That time Francis used a poor child for a photo-op to make himself appear compassionate when he was anything but.  His answer was an empty naturalistic attempt devoid of any Christianity.  In our previous post on this topic, Francis' compassion or indifference to a little girl in the Philippines?, we recommended Francis to read the Baltimore Catechism which has the answer as well as the Gospel According to Matthew.  

As Francis demonstrates in his speech at the pediatric hospital in Genoa, his religion has no answers.  This even though he is gazing directly at the reason.  As Jesus the Christ says in, the greatest sermon of all time, The Sermon on the Mount,
“Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thy own eye, and then shalt thou see to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye.” (St. Matthew 7:5)

May God through His infinite Mercy and Grace cast the beam out of Francis’ eyes, open his heart and mind, in order to convert him to the Catholic Faith, where he will find the answers to his questions.


Baltimore Catechism

60. What are the chief punishments of Adam which we inherit through original sin?

The chief punishments of Adam which we inherit through original sin are: death, suffering, ignorance, and a strong inclination to sin.



All things are delivered to me by my Father. And no one knoweth the Son, but the Father: neither doth any one know the Father, but the Son, and he to whom it shall please the Son to reveal him. Come to me, all you that labour, and are burdened, and I will refresh you. Take up my yoke upon you, and learn of me, because I am meek, and humble of heart: and you shall find rest to your souls. For my yoke is sweet and my burden light.

Saturday, May 27, 2017

Francis’ pubstool theology returns!


The “god of surprises” hosts 

‘Theology on Tap’

in Genoa



a pitcher of the finest modernist dross

“Jesus has never stood still, and as everyone who is walking, he exposed himself to tensions. What we should fear the most is to live a static life. That of a priest who has everything sorted out, everything in order, well structured and at its place.... Jesus has always been a man on the road, walking, open to the surprises of God, instead a priest who has all planned, everything structured and sorted out, is generally closed to the surprises of God, and the joyful surprise of the encounter is lost.”

“These peripheries are the reflection of the places where the primal charism was born.”

“A good archbishop, Cardinal Canestri, said that “the Church is like a river, the important thing is to be in that river”, whether it is on the right or left side of the river, it is a legitimate option.”

“The charism is to be incarnate, it was born in a concrete place and then it grows. But we must always look for where it was born. This teaches us to love people in concrete places. Concretely. The concreteness of the Church gives the diocesan nature. This does not mean killing the charism, no, this helps the charism become more real, visible and near. When the universality of an institution forgets to enter concrete places, in concrete dioceses, then this order eventually forgets where it was born. To universalize, but without that concreteness of the diocese. Flying religious institutes do not exist, and if someone claims that, they will end badly. Thinking of universality without concreteness will lead to self-referentiality.”