Not even a day had passed in the new secularist calendar year and another novelty comes from Francis the 'Humble'. Instead of having a procession with three male magi, Francis on the Feast of The Solemnity of Mary, the Holy Mother of God had a procession of two male kings and one female king. (CMJ's note: from 1568 AD to 1960 AD, January 1st was the Feast of The Circumcision of the Lord and the Octave of the Nativity until John XXIII declared it simply, the Octave of Christmas, which it remained 'til 1969 AD when it became the Feast of The Solemnity of Mary, the Holy Mother of God.) Notice in the photo above, the girl is dressed not as a queen with a tiara but as a king with a crown. In the modern times in which we live, with the following men dressing as a women and taking female hormones, Bruce ‘Caitlin’ Jenner, Laurence ‘Lana’ Wachowski, Martin ‘Martine’ Rothblatt, James ‘Jennifer’ Pritzker, Robert ‘Lynn Conway’ Sanders , etc... and the resultant confusion in the secular world which has resulted from exalting and pushing a social order which is abhorrent to God, the Vatican decided to pull this off. Giving the nod to politically correct sexually aberrant mores is nothing new at the Vatican. Recall Cardinal Schönborn's delight as fellow Austrian, Thomas ‘Conchita Wurst’ Neuwirth, a drag queen, won the Eurovision Song Contest in 2014. We can hear the hemming and hawing from the some of the conservative church commentators, ‘Francis didn't know this was going to happen! It was the evil men who surround him who pulled another trick’. So who is responsible for the young girl dressing as a king? Why it is none other than the Master of Pontifical Liturgical Celebrations, one Monsignor Guido Marini. Michael Voris said of him, “In 2013 Pope Francis chose to keep Monsignor Marini as Master of Pontifical Liturgical Celebrations, because of Marini's traditional formation.” The blogger Mundabor wrote, “It is for a conservative Catholic very difficult not to like the person and the work of Monsignor Guido Marini. A true lover of sound liturgy”. The pseudo-conservative Fr. John Zuhl$dorf even put a selfie of himself with Msgr. Marini on his blog.According to Rome Reports, Guido Marini is, “one of the Pope's closest aides, his discreet work is among the most important in the church.”Discreet indeed! We can hear the conservative church commentators, ‘It wasn't Msgr. Marini, for he is a bastion of tradition!’ Oh that's right, he is one of those conservative modernists of the Second Vatican Council tradition. This brings to mind the BBC News report of the Marini's exchange with Francis after the papal conclave election.
“Minutes after the election result was declared in the Sistine Chapel, a
Vatican official called the Master of Ceremonies offered to the new Pope
the traditional papal red cape trimmed with ermine that his predecessor
Pope Benedict XVI gladly wore on ceremonial occasions.
"No thank you, Monsignore," Pope Francis is reported to have replied. "You put it on instead. Carnival time is over!"”
No, Carnival time just started then. So if it wasn't Marini according to conservative church commentator logic was it Francis? Call Me Jorge... believes it was both Francis and Marini with the ultimate responsibility belonging to Francis as he is in charge.
Francis & Marini
Do they look like they don't get along?
Nope, they appear to be two peas in a modernist pod!
— More women dressed as Kings!
Two of these kings are women.
The Spanish site, La Informacion suggested that Francis was taking a cue from Manuela Carmena and copying what was done in the neighborhoods of San Blas-Canillejas and Puente de Vallecas. In
2015 Manuela Carmena became the Mayor of Madrid, Spain. She is an
ex-communist who was an opponent of the Catholic dictator, Francisco
Franco, and regularly sued him in court. Earlier in December 2015, Carmena had said the government didn't want to change history and in the next breathe
she proceeded to call for women to be allowed to dress as men to play
the three kings in the Ride of Kings (la Cabalgata de los Reyes).
Another reason given was that it would help the visibility of women in
Spanish culture!
The neighborhood of Cibeles took it a step further and had three queens!
info Catolica reports this an absurd controversy because Benedict XVI started the modernist tradition of having females dressed as male kings on this day. They further said since that date, it alternates every other year with 2 boys & 1 girl one year and the next 1 boy & 2 girls in the procession. Francis is no different than Benedict XVI in his substance, only the styles contrast. This is another hermeneutics of continuity between the modernism of the two. Thanks to reflexionar for this comment!
Two women with Francis at the Vatican. The one with a mustache
is named Neria Lejárraga but refers to herself as ‘Diego’.
Here's the CTV video of the procession in St. Peter's Basilica.
What does Church Militant do when something happens which doesn't fit the Church Militant narrative? Why it's simple...they lie about the facts. Everyone already knows they don't ever criticize Francis (but for some reason they don't extend this same Catholic courtesy to every prelate in existence who are merely following Francis' lead). As we covered before, see Athanasius Schneider wants to recognize the FSSPX ...paging Michael Voris!, Church Militant's current hot bishop is Anthanasius Schneider who shared in a recent interview his thoughts about the FSSPX. Church Militant must not have liked what Schneider had to say because here is how Ryan Fitzgerald reported it in Bishop Slams Liturgical Abuse, Stands Up for Trad. Catholics:
compare this...
"He concludes the interview on a question about the controversial Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX). Carefully handling the subject, he chooses to focus on the positive elements to be found in the society, expressing hope that they can be brought back into full communion with the Church — a status they don't currently enjoy. Offering his take on how to best tackle the task of reconciling the society with the Church, Bp. Schneider believes both sides are overestimating the importance of Vatican II."
Capture of the text from Church Militant website.
to the reality...
"To my knowledge there are no weighty reasons in order to deny the clergy and faithful of the SSPX the official canonical recognition, meanwhile they should be accepted as they are.This was indeed Archbishop Lefebvre’s petition to the Holy See: “Accept us as we are”....
...When the SSPX believes, worship and conducts a moral [life] as it was demanded and recognized by the Supreme Magisterium and was observed universally in the Church during a centuries long period and when the SSPX recognizes the legitimacy of the Pope and the diocesan bishops and prays for them publicly and recognizes also the validity of the sacraments according to the editio typica of the new liturgical books,this should suffice for a canonical recognition of the SSPX on behalf of the Holy See. Otherwise the often repeated pastoral and ecumenical openness in the Church of our days will manifestly lose its credibility and the history will one day reproach to the ecclesiastical authorities of our days that they have “laid on the brothers greater burden than required” (cf. Acts 15:28), which is contrary to the pastoral method of the Apostles."
Did you see the word "hope" once in Schneider's words?
No, well neither did we!
After 'misreporting' about Schneider, Mr. Fitzgerald mentions Bishop Robert Morlin (the bishop of the irreverent and immoral priest Fr. Z) who is "a favorite among traditional Catholics" and who said of the FSSPX, "have nothing to do with them." What does this have to do with Schneider's interview?
Absolutely nothing!
This leaves us with several questions:
Did Ryan Fitzgerald read the entire interview?
Is he hoping Church
Militant readers don't click on the link and read the entire
interview?
Was Mr. Fitzgerald trying to toe the company line?
Or was he ordered by his boss at Church Militant to misreport?
Is he trying to prejudice the reader with the Church Militant interpretation in mind?
An unidentified male, Anthony Raphael Perlas (founder of Latin Mass Society)
and Ryan Fitzgerald celebrate Anthony's birthday.
*** UPDATE 14 August 2015 1:30 PST ***
Michael Voris has issued a clarification on the words of the false conservative, Athanasius Schneider, which includes a private email exchanged between the two. Voris still hasn't explained why his organization misreported the events.
Look at the screenshot from his blog above. Zuhl$dorf goes from Francis' upcoming encyclical on the enviroment to a movie about St. Francis, which he proceeds to rip to shreds, called Brother Sun, Mister Moon. (None of us at Call Me Jorge... has seen this movie nor heard of what its about.) In the middle of this diatribe against the movie, he posts a link so the reader can purchase the same movie at amazon.com where Zuhl$dorf conveniently receives a commission from everyone of his readers who decide to click the link and buy Brother Sun, Sister Moon. Cha-ching!!! Who cares if it is a leftist movie (according to Zuhl$dorf) as long as one makes a buck off of it! That's not all, for John Z. is only getting warmed up.
Read that last line in the screenshot,
"People who promote and have sex between people of the same sex are violating God’s obvious will."
We, at Call Me Jorge..., couldn't agree more with the statement. Here's where the hypocrisy part comes in. See dear reader, John Zuhl$dorf has in the past promoted movies which have sodomy in them. We quote from our post, "Don" Zuhl$dorf's sacrilegious and immoral blog post,
Now that we have covered the background, onto the disturbing post. Call Me Jorge... read the entry, An Important Anniversary, which was supposedly announcing the 7th anniversary of Summorum Pontificum. Dear reader, if you were to write a column on Summorum Pontificum how would you start it? With a story about the Tridentine Mass or one about Benedict XVI? Neither if you are "Don" Zuhl$dorf. Let's look at a screenshot from his entry, An Important Anniversary.
Wait a minute! Isn't this supposed to be about Summorum Pontificum? Instead "Don" Zuhl$dorf is writing about the immoral movie of John Boorman. For those who don't know about this film, Deliverance, it is infamous for its scene of sodomy. Ever heard the quote "squeal like a pig" used? It's from the same notorious scene. As if that isn't bad enough, several people are also murdered in the film. Why would a 'priest' blog about a piece of music from this film? Why introduce your readers to a film this perverse? Are there not other films having their anniversary this day? This isn't the first time he has written of an immoral film in his blog. Who could forget,The Lives of Others? Thankfully this time, "Don" Zuhl$dorf didn't put an amazon link to this film for his readers to purchase in the post. One last thing about the clip "Don" Zuhl$dorf chose to embed on his website, it uses God's name in vain not once but twice! This can be heard at the 3 minutes 59 seconds and the 4 minutes 6 seconds marks of the clip. This man calls himself a priest? What were they teaching in the seminary he attended?
Zuhl$dorf also has the audacity to call the National Catholic Reporter instead the National Sodomy Reporter! How can he do this when he promotes a film with sodomy, links to a clip from the same movie which uses God's name in vain not once but twice, and puts an amazon link to another film with nudity and sex on his blog?
We at Call Me Jorge... feel that Christ said it best in His sermon on the mount,
And why seest thou the mote that is in thy brother' s eye; and seest not the beam that is in thy own eye? Or how sayest thou to thy brother: Let me cast the mote out of thy eye; and behold a beam is in thy own eye? Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam in thy own eye, and then shalt thou see to cast out the mote out of thy brother' s eye.
WE HAVE NOT CENSORED ANY PHOTOS OR VIDEOS AS WE WANT THE READER TO SEE THEM AS NICHOLSON PRESENTS THEM ON HIS SOCIAL MEDIA
Fr. Paul Nicholson for those readers of Call Me Jorge... who don't know him, is a presbyter who is a card carrying member of The Priestly Society of the Holy Crosswhich is connected to The Prelature of the Holy Cross and Opus Dei (Praelatura Sanctae Crucis et Operis Dei). In other words he is intrinsically united with Opus Dei but is under his local Bishop's jurisdiction. He is well-known for being tactless as can been seen from this picture (shown below) which he posted to his facebook page and his blog two Ash Wednesdays past.
Isn't that cute? Nope, it sacrilegious! And this man claims to be a priest! What's with making sexual innuendos with a sacramental of the Church? Then he uses the same sacramental to imply a profanity! He even used this self-created meme as the title his video for Ash Wednesday. Does he not fear God and think the Faith a joke?
**** WARNING IMMODESTLY DRESSED MEN ****
@ 30 seconds & 1 minute 56 seconds
Nicholson explains how cursing can be good, we are not sure if this includes his sacrilegious profanity shown above but perhaps this line of reasoning is why he feels it's OK for him to behave this manner.
Cursing Can Be Good! Seriously!
Here's what Nicholson wrote concerning Fr. Gruner's recent death.
Now while we at Call Me Jorge... don't agree with Fr. Gruner or his message (we will have an upcoming post on his legacy) we do have tact and we pray for the repose of his soul. As a member of Opus Dei, Nicholson must be in on, "The fearsome, terrifying Truth". Is Nicholson implying Gruner is in hell?
Not content with a few facebook posts, Nicholson wrote a whole entry on his blog on the topic, The "Scotiabank Cathedral". In it among other things, he states Fr. Gruner was suspended from priestly duties. How about some proof Nicholson? Being internet savy, surely it wouldn't take much for you to scan in the documents and link to them which prove this? Or should we just take your word for it?
Speaking of Nicholson's blog look at these two screenshots from it.
His face is prominently in the header but what's that in the far right column?
Why it's a confession counter with a send me money button underneath it!
Does he bring an Excel spreadsheet with him into the confessional?
Has Nicholson tweeted about anything else recently in his confrontational manner? You bet!
Here he is tweeting about Michael Coren leaving the Church and becoming an Anglican on 27 April 2015. (We at Call Me Jorge... find Coren's apostasy appalling, which is he became an Anglican because they support sodomites.) We find this interesting, Nicholson is a Canadian and therefor a subject of Queen Elizabeth II but he is also a member of the Francis' church. Queen Elizabeth II signed the Marriage Act of 2013 which allows same-sex marriage and has said of same-sex marriage that it is "wonderful". As a Catholic wouldn't it be his duty to have strong words for the Queen of England who is also the head of the Anglican Church when she was planning an upcoming meeting with Francis last year. This isn't Nicholson's only conundrum with those of authority over him. Below is a screenshot of his facebook on 7 February 2014.
Instead he commented how cool it was that the British Embassy to the Holy See followed him on twitter. "Cherio!" Where's the fire and damnation? What? "God Save the Queen!" No anathema today Nicholson? Has the cat got your tongue? Maybe, the elevator is infrequently in service.
So who does this Paul Nicholson hang with? Glad you asked!
Despite his busy schedule, Paul still finds time to relax with a glass of wine.
Nothing says one is loyal son to Francis like taking a selfie!
Hooray for adding St. Joseph to the Canon of the Mass!
Only a humble cracker jack would post a photo of a piece of cake (humble pie)
with his image on it to facebook for the world to see!
Having fun with the Churchmilitant crew.
Did Nicholson ask Cardinal Burke about sister Joel Green and seder meals?
Yup, retweeting a play on words of the title of a book about
sadomasochistic sex with pictures of Francis.
Nothing says he is a cracker jack prelate like a photo of his food.
His least favorite heretics the SSPX.
It's the devotion to Divine Mercy which was banned until efforts by
Cardinal Karol Wojtyla had these condemnations lifted in 1978.
Who says Nicholson doesn't have a sense of humor?
It's a back issue of the Feeneyite publication, "From the House Tops". Was this issue published before or after they reconciled with Rome? Look who commented, why it's Ginny Carroll, whose husband Terry is the executive producer of churchmilitant.tv and known for his uncharitable rants on traditional catholics.
**** WARNING IMMODEST DRESS ****
We are confused here. Is Nicholson making fun of homeschoolers or supporting them? He often laments catholics don't have large families anymore but then he posts something which could be construed as a knock against homeschooling. Doesn't he understand that many Catholics homeschool due to financial constraints and not wanting their children to be corrupted by the bad morals of the world?
As Nicholson writes above, "There are remarkable similarities between Pope Francis and St. Josemaria Escriva. Most notably, they are both suspected of heresy because of the novelty of their approach..."
Living the first Christmas!
Is this why Nicholson doesn't like Fr. Gruner? According to Opus (Ju)Dei founder St. Josemaria Escriva, he was encouraged by Sister Lucy of Fatima to spread Opus (Ju)Dei to the world!
Hanging out with ex-Feeneyites, sisters of the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary. Will Nicholson chill with his least favorite heretics (aka SSPX) when they sign their deal with Rome?
Ah, the fruits of Vatican II, Opus (Ju)Dei, Saint John Paul II!
That not Zuhl$dorf's plate it's father Paul's. Guess who cooked it for him?
Liza and Simon Rafe of churchmilitant.tv
Ah the irony, a cracker jack holding a box of cracker jacks!
Celebrating the Novus Ordo Missae for a wedding.
Shooting his show at churchmilitant.tv which we kid you not is named, "God Furst".
**** WARNING IMMODEST MAN & WOMAN ****
Why does a priest post stuff like this?
We guess this is what a 'missionary' priest does when not shooting videos or blogging.
How many times can one post about food?
**** WARNING MEN CROSS-DRESSING ****
Can't imagine why he would post this!?
Opus (Ju)Dei prelates will change the world!
Oh boy, he even has a make believe toy of himself.
Nicholson even pushes fake news on his facebook page. Putting stories like this up on his facebook page discredits Catholics of all stripes.
This post makes people ignore the truth when they hear it. Instead Nichlson should have done his homework and posted a real quote like this from David Rockefeller's 2002 book, Memoirs:
In his videos which we at Call Me Jorge... are guessing, and we stress that word guessing, are made at a warehouse probably in the Detroit area filled with lots of cameras and toys, Nicholson dresses in vestments as if he were in the process of offering the Holy Sacrifice. He also uses a backdrop which appears to have been grabbed from either flickr or wikipedia of a chapel in Califonia.
That's a real church named, Mission Santa Barbara Chapel, which Nicholson pretends to be at.
Below is Nicholson, recommending Catholics should study and learn from the Amish heretics because they have large families. Guess in Nicholson's bizzaro upside-down world of catholicism some heretics are more equal than others. His favorite bogeyman after Fr. Gruner, the SSPX has large families. So why not do a video on them or other traditional Catholic groups with large families? Because the heretical descendants of Anabaptists must fit Nicholson's bill.
Fight Liberal, Secular Assimilation With The Amish
"Many of Josemaria Escriva's concepts call to mind the Talmudic
tradition and reveal his profound knowledge of the Jewish world, as well
as his passionate love, as he openly repeated, for two Jews, Jesus and
Mary," said Rabbi Kreiman. "Moreover, that which most likens his
teachings to Judaism is the vocation of man to serve God through
creative work, perfecting creation every day, through perfection of
work."
The rabbi said that he was pleased about the interreligious prayer
meeting for peace occurring January 24 in Assisi. Such meetings, he
said, "help us to remember often that we all have the same common
father."
Kreiman also spoke of the need for Christians and Jews to "work together
in favor of the principal humanitarian causes: social order,
unemployment and poverty, drugs, hunger, and the fight against a
consumerism empty of spirituality." He expressed his hope that "working
and praying together, all according to our own traditions, we will
arrive unified at the table of the Father."
As if that wasn't enough Kreiman credited Opus Dei with assisting him in become a Talmudic rabbi,
"Opus Dei members helped me, right from the beginning of my seminary
studies, to persevere in my vocation," he said, "and I have also seen
them do it with other rabbis, for which I am deeply grateful."
This same rabbi went to the Vatican in 2005 to celebrate the 40th Anniversary of Vatican II's Nostra Aetate and had these comments to share in an interview with Zenit News, Judeo-Christian Dialogue Nearing "a Promised Land",
"Both relations between Jews and Catholics, as well as relations between the Holy See and Israel, have increased so much. On the Christian side, I think the only limitation has been to indicate the dialogue with Jews as important but not urgent. Now, it is clear that the dialogue with Jews is not an option but an obligation. It is for Catholic people to accept the Jewish people as the original alliance."
..."The Catholic Church's support of Judaism is not like that of one
country for another, based on material power. Christians' support of
Judaism is a religious spiritual force."
..."For observant rabbis it is time to begin to think that the Church is not an enemy of Israel, but its best ally."
"It is not only about saying that Christians and Jews are friends, that Jews are not accused of deicide; it must be said that Judaism and Christianity are the foundation of the struggle against paganism."
Jorge Mario Bergoglio and his late rabbinical Talmudic friend, Angel Kreiman
For those who would like to do futher research on Talmudic Judaism's connection with Opus Dei and Saint Josemaría Escrivá de Balaguer (before the name change aka José María Mariano Escriba Albás) we recommend the book, Opus Judei by Jose Maria Escriba. The Spanish language book can be found here and here in pdf. Excerpts in English from the book can be found here.
This leads us back to Nicholson's buddy, Michael Voris. See dear reader, Nicholson is the spiritual support for Michael Voris. What then is Michael's answer to the problems which ail the world?
If you guessed Opus (Ju)Dei you are correct!
Back to Nicholson...
He is always ranting and raving declaring schism here, heretics there, and saying how he an obedient son. Is he really now? A video entitled, Should a priest disobey lawful ecclesiastical authority?, is all about these subjects.
highlights of the above mentioned video
Turns out Louie Verrecchio in a recent article, The log in Fr. Paul Nicholson’s eye, points out that Nicholson is far from obedient to his own bishop!
To hear Fr. Nicholson speak one would think that Fr. Gruner was
living the high life, when in truth he managed the Fatima Center’s
resources with the utmost frugality and diligence.
His true colors showing through all the more, Fr. Nicholson even took
to task those who lent financial support to the Fatima Center, with the
clear implication being: Hey… how about sending some of that money to me!
No surprise, I suppose, coming as it does from the same priest who
coined the pathetic and utterly undignified fundraising plea, “A dollar
for my collar.”
Setting aside for the present moment Fr. Nicholson’s unnerving
preoccupation with money, I’d like to address the question posed in his
video, “Should a priest disobey lawful ecclesiastical authority?”
There’s an old saying about glass houses and stones…
Apparently, Fr. Nicholson isn’t very familiar with it. Not yet, anyway.
For years now, I’ve kept confidential my firsthand knowledge of just
how Fr. Nicholson approaches the matter of obedience to lawful
ecclesiastical authority in the management of his own affairs, and it
doesn’t exactly paint a picture of priestly propriety.
Well, I’m keeping that knowledge to myself no longer.
It’s time for people to see the man behind the brocade just a little
more clearly; especially those poor trusting souls who have been duped
into thinking that Fr. Nicholson is a model of integrity.
In mid-2013, I spent several days at the Church Militant.tv studios
filming a 13 part series on Vatican II, and I saw quite a bit of Fr.
Nicholson when I was there.
Shortly after I arrived, I had lunch in Michael’s office while he and
Fr. Nicholson discussed the logistics of getting his new venture as a
“Missionary Preacher” up and running.
I remember well just how happy Fr. Nicholson was when Mike told him
that one of the CMTV staff members had just finished placing the order
for his new Apple lap top computer, presumably the one he still uses to
launch his ill-informed attacks against so many good people.
I can’t say that I paid an awful lot of attention to the details
being discussed since it really didn’t concern me, but even so, I was
struck by the covert tenor of the conversation.
The following day, the tone of that meeting would make a lot more sense…
Fr. Nicholson, speaking with me one on one, told me a little bit
about the strained relationship that he has with his local ordinary,
Bishop Ronald Fabbro.
More importantly, he was excited to tell me that he was entering into
an agreement with Bishop Fabbro that would allow him to work fulltime
in his own apostolate.
That agreement, however, comes with a major stipulation, he said.
He told me that Bishop Fabbro, for whatever reason, is adamant that
Fr. Nicholson is to have nothing to do with Michael Voris and Church
Militant.tv., and the agreement to keep him incardinated in the Diocese
of London, Ontario while he works freely in the apostolate is contingent
upon his maintaining that separation.
Fr. Nicholson, ever given to histrionics, then made the nature of his
dirty little secret as crystal clear as the glass house in which he
currently dwells as he leaned in close and said, “So remember, Mr.
Louis, you didn’t see me here…”
The problem is though, I did see him there, and not just for a quick visit.
In fact, our conversation took place in the hallway just outside of
Fr. Paul Nicholson’s very own office, located right there in the Church
Militant.tv facility just a short flight of steps away from Michael
Voris’ office.
So much for giving a nod to the local bishop, eh?
Oops, Nicholson must mean do as I say not as I do!
We are certain that Nicholson will declare us ananthema and doomed to hell. Perhaps before he does this he could first take the time to point out to his spiritual charge, Michael Voris that he is teaching heresy in a video in which he says heretics are not members of the Church. You can't make stuff like this up.
Wherever he goes Nicholson takes Francis order of "making a mess" to heart.
Paul Nicholson could greatly benefit by reading and reflecting on 1 Corinthians 13:1-13,before he opens his loud mouth again.
Charity is to be preferred before all gifts.
If I speak with the tongues of men, and of angels, and have not charity, I am become as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal.And if I should have prophecy and should know all mysteries, and all knowledge, and if I should have all faith, so that I could remove mountains, and have not charity, I am nothing.And if I should distribute all my goods to feed the poor, and if I should deliver my body to be burned, and have not charity, it profiteth me nothing.Charity is patient, is kind: charity envieth not, dealeth not perversely; is not puffed up;Is not ambitious, seeketh not her own, is not provoked to anger, thinketh no evil;
Rejoiceth not in iniquity, but rejoiceth with the truth;Beareth all things, believeth all things, hopeth all things, endureth all things.Charity never falleth away: whether prophecies shall be made void, or tongues shall cease, or knowledge shall be destroyed.For we know in part, and we prophesy in part.But when that which is perfect is come, that which is in part shall be done away.
When I was a child, I spoke as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child. But, when I became a man, I put away the things of a child.We see now through a glass in a dark manner; but then face to face. Now I know in part; but then I shall know even as I am known.And now there remain faith, hope, and charity, these three: but the greatest of these is charity.
