Showing posts with label Maurice Pinay. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Maurice Pinay. Show all posts

Monday, March 6, 2017

Malachi Martin blasphemes Jesus the Christ


🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨 WARNING 🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨
BLASPHEMY
AGAINST
JESUS THE CHRIST
🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨 WARNING 🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨






Many fanatical supporters of the late Malachi Martin when confronted with evidence of Martin’s blasphemies against Our Lord, Jesus the Christ excuse them away.  Often one will hear them say, ‘It's taken out of context!’,  ‘That's a bald face lie, Malachi never said that!’, or ‘Yes, he said that but then he corrected himself.’ etc...  So here’s one the worst blasphemies we have heard straight from the mouth of the con-man himself.  Listen (if you still think Malachi Martin was Catholic) to Bernard Janzen interview Malachi Martin in Martin’s New York City home sometime in 1996.  The interview is sold as a three CDs under the name ‘Crossing the Desert’ at Triumph Communications.  We’ve cued up the quote below so that one doesn’t have to waste their time listening to the rest of the triple-agent’s tripe.  We believe it clearly shows the context in which Martin was speaking and remember at the time he was selling himself to the world as a traditional Catholic.  We wonder where did Malachi Martin get such as blasphemous idea in his head?  Did he come across it in the Rothschild owned Charlie Hebdo?  Maybe he corresponded with Kenneth Copeland, one of the leaders of the Charismatic Movement & buddies of Francis, and learned it from him?  Perhaps he attended one of Dr. David Tombs’ lectures?  Plausibly, knowing the Talmudic friends Martin kept company with his entire life and his claim that he studied the deuterocanonical period for knowledge of Jesus the Christ in Hebrew and Arabic manuscripts while at the University of Oxford and the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, he came across the idea in the blasphemous, Toledot Yeshhu.  From there it was most likely short work for his overactive imagination to project a part of the scurrilous and blasphemous medieval work to Our Lord’s Crucifixion.  Anyway you cut it, Malachi Martin’s blather was horrifyingly blasphemous!



“...and was he humiliated because crucifixion is a terrible thing to hang naked like that for six hours and then die and spitting your guts out, [inaudible mumble] having scourged him spat upon him and sodomized him”



Malachi Martin’s blasphemy begins at 1 hour & 23 minutes






Related:

Call Me Jorge...

Maurice Pinay

Michael Hoffman

Angel Queen

Monday, January 30, 2017

Francis’ Babylonian marriage contract — ketubah


 Russian billionaire and president of the European Jewish Congress,
Dr. Viatcheslav Moshe Kantor presents Francis with a ketubah.


In our previous post, never forget!, we touched upon what the members of the European Jewish Congress discussed when they visited with Francis at the Vatican on International Holocaust Remembrance Day.  One thing which slipped past us, at Call Me Jorge..., was the gift (shown above and below) which we thought was simply, as the Opus Dei staffed Rome Reports implied, a framed piece of artwork containing “a special blessing of your [Francis'] home”.   Thankfully, Tradition In Action knew what this “special Jewish blessing” is — a ketubah.
“During the visit, Kantor gave the Pope a picture, above. It is a special Jewish blessing surrounded by an illumination representing the world, a tree of life and two peacocks at its base, which represent the resurrection. The peacock tails fall down and around the Hebrew text wishing love, abundance and fertility. This Jewish custom called Ketubah is commonly given to wish protection over homes and marriages.”
source: Tradition In Action, Jewish magnate blesses Francis at the Vatican

(Click images to enlarge)

Closeup of the ketubah given to Francis. 


— What is a Ketubah?


Here we have Rome Reports selling the idea to their audience that what is in reality a commercial transaction — a Babylonian marriage contract — is a “special Jewish blessing”.   Doesn’t this remind you dear readers of how usury is sold to the public?   Don’t for one second think that Francis didn’t know what he was receiving.  For Francis, “told them [European Jewish Congress delegates] that when he was a child, his parents use to receive visits of some Jewish friends, so he knows good their culture and traditions.”  This is true as we have pointed out countless times, on this blog, that Francis understands the minutiae of the man-made Talmudic religion.  He may appear on the surface to be a ‘modernist’ but underneath this veneer, Francis is a ‘rabbinic traditionalist’.  Interestingly, the Talmud is also seen by the rabbis as “the katubah, a wedding contract between God and Israel, who have entered into a kind of cosmic marriage.” (The Encyclopedia of Jewish Myth, Magic & Mysticism, 2nd Edition, by Rabbi Geoffrey W. Dennis, page 549 of the epub edition, see entry Torah)  The rabbis then use the Talmud to annul the laws of God.  As Maurice Pinay of the Maurice Pinay Blog writes,
“The ketubah is a non-biblical, rabbinic tradition. Like so many rabbinic traditions, it overturns biblical law allegedly for the purpose of 'repairing' God's alleged poor judgment. Jesus Christ vehemently opposed these traditions of the rabbis which make God's word of no effect, but today this hard fact is brushed aside with such fluffy slogans as, “Jesus was Jewish, and we appreciate his culture, where he came from.” In reality, the people who sign these ketubot form a covenant not with God but with the rabbis in their millenia-old struggle to overthrow God and His word and to put themselves in God's place and replace His word with Talmud, Kabbalah and the 'Noahide laws' of Babylon”
source: Maurice Pinay, 'Noahides' Embrace Rabbinic, Babylonian Wedding Tradition

Returning to the commentary of Tradition In Action we read,
“We wonder whether Kantor was referring to the marriage of the Conciliar Church and Judaism. It certainly corresponds perfectly with the Russian Jew's proposal to the Pope to work together in areas of education and family. He also suggested that the Vatican hold an exhibit of Jewish art that belongs to him.”
source: Tradition In Action, Jewish magnate blesses Francis at the Vatican

Unable to find more than cursory video of the gift exchange we went over to photovat.com for the official photos from meeting.  On page 4 of the many photos taken (linked to below) one can see Dr. Kantor presenting Francis with the ketubah, explaining it to him, and then the two men shake hands as if they had just completed a business transaction.  Call Me Jorge... concurs with Tradition In Action’s commentary — this is the marriage of Francis’ noahide Novus Ordo and Talmudic Judaism.  Even though the intrigues and collusion go back hundreds of years it is the first time that we are aware of a symbolic marriage such as this taking place.


 Kantor explaining to Francis the ketubah through the Vatican’s translator.

The two men shake on the Babylonian contract.
source for images: Servizio Fotografico - L’Osservatore Romano, Delegazione della European Jewish Congress, page 4, photos numbering — 00673_27012017 & 00674_27012017.

Tuesday, December 22, 2015

Christmas wishes from Talmudic Judaism

“Christmas has no place in the Holy Land,  let us remove the [Christian] vampires before they once again drink our blood.”


For more information on Rabbi Benzi Gopstein and those who finance him read:




Click here to read Eradicate the Vampires by Benzi Gopstein (in Hebrew).


More quotes from Gopstein translated and published in Haaretz article, Jewish Extremists' Leader: Christians Are 'Blood Sucking Vampires' Who Should Be Expelled From Israel by Sharon Pulwer:


“Christmas has no place in the Holy Land.”

[Gopstein] is disturbed “the fall of the line of defense of the Jewish people against our deadly enemy for hundreds of years – the Christian Church.”

[Gopstein] said the Church had used “the maximum tools at its disposal to destroy the Jewish people,” and that today “the Church has been defeated roundly when the Jewish people has one of the strongest armies in the world and they have no chance any longer of destroying our body.”

“A last hope remains to those vampires and blood suckers – the mission. If Jews cannot be killed, they can still be converted.”

“Missionary bookstores offer their products in front of everyone on Jaffa Road in Jerusalem, whole communities are crawling with missionaries, many businesses are run by them and are used by the mission, many cases using camouflage and without the knowledge of the employees.”

The “fear that every Jew felt, the disgust that we described above at Christianity – disgust that was the only thing that saved us from the dark days in Europe – has disappeared with the ‘good life’ of the democratic age…and the missionary is on the prowl for prey.”

“I call on everyone to raise a cry and fight this corrupt phenomenon in the best tradition of Judaism, before we all, including those who observe the commandments among us, become a community of sycophants.”

“Christmas has no place in the Holy Land, let us remove the vampires before they once again drink our blood.”


Quotes translated by google.translate from original article in Hebrew to English:

“Against such inconceivable power of the Jewish people was poor lamb among wolves, easy prey for those who thirst for blood. The history of the Jews of Europe, as well as the community's poor here in the Land of Israel, engraved with the blood of millions - the Crusades cruel where whole communities were wiped, pogroms across the continent, blood libels to countless, mass expulsions from England, France, Spain and Portugal - all of which were but At stations brutal campaign moved our people in Christendom, journey came to an end in the chimneys of the crematoria of Auschwitz, while the Vatican rubbing their hands with glee.”


“What was the secret of eternal Jew? How he managed to survive the horrors of the church? Without a doubt, it was a burning faith in the righteousness of our path, deep abhorrence toward Christianity every Jewish child was breastfed with his mother's milk and the absolute conviction that passed from generation to generation, and that death is much better than surrender to the church. Only firm tenacity as described could withstand any shocks that struck us, Popes rose and fell, rose and fell countries, inquisitors and Gestapo officers thought they could destroy Israel...”




****** UPDATED BELOW ******
****** AT 800PM 22 DECEMBER 2015 ******
****** WITH NEW LINK ******

Tuesday, December 15, 2015

Francis' short meeting with Judaic terrorist, Bernard-Henri Lévy


Bernard-Henri Lévy meets with Francis at the 9 December 2015 general audience.

Bernard-Henri Lévy is a major player in the cryptocracy.  He is an Algerian born Jew who founded the phony-intellectual Nouveaux Philosophes (New Philosophers).  Lévy is an ardent Zionist and attributes to himself key roles in the 2014 Ukrainian revolution (Euromaidan Revolution), and the Arab Springs particularly in the Libyan & Syrian wars.


Lévy in his film “Le Serment de Tobrouk” (The Oath of Tobruk) detailing how 
he convinced France's president (Nicolas Sarkozy) to back the Libyan revolt.


For background on Bernard-Henri Lévy see:


(image on the left) Lévy in Sarajevo, Yugoslavia hiding from a sniper while being interviewed by a reporter.  (image on the right) The reality of what happened was entirely different.  Lévy was pretending a sniper was nearby.  Notice the policemen walking nonchalantly in the background.  What a fraud and con-man Bernard-Henri Lévy is!


The interview below was published on Sunday 13 December 2015 by the algemeiner.  Of note is Bernard-Henri Lévy, a promoter of Zionist-Moslem terrorism (aka freedom fighters), seeking a 'Noahide partnership' with Francis' Frankenchurch of holocaustianity because of the violence perpetrated by Israeli backed ISIS in Iraq.   Is this a predetermined synthesis?  As always the underlines are Call Me Jorge...'s for emphasis.


Following a meeting with Pope Francis I, and ahead of his upcoming trip to New York to speak at a United Nations event dedicated to Catholic-Jewish relations, famed French philosopher Bernard-Henri Lévy spoke with The Algemeiner, in an exclusive interview, about the Church’s relationship with Jews.
The Algemeiner: You will be at United Nations headquarters in New York on Wednesday for an ecumenical meeting of Christians and Jews, is that right? 
Bernard-Henri Lévy: Ecumenical” is not the right word. The event is a celebration — open to the public, including your readers — of the 50th anniversary of the remarkable revolution within the Catholic Church that brought about the decision to move beyond antisemitism. And it was indeed a revolution — one of the few successful revolutions of the 20th century. At the end of it, the church banned antisemitism. That is a far cry from the fancy phrases and hollow dialogue that often fall under the heading of ecumenism. 
The Algemeiner: Do you believe that a “decision” can cure antisemitism? 
Bernard-Henri Lévy: You have hit on an advantage of the Roman Catholic Church vis-à-vis Protestantism and, at the moment, Islam: its hierarchy. The Church is headed by a pope; bulls and encyclicals have the force of law. Once a law is promulgated, of course, it can take time for hearts to follow. But that is, in effect, what has happened. And that is what we will celebrate Wednesday at the United Nations. The overwhelming majority of Catholics are no longer the enemies of the Jews. The toxic theme of the “deicidal people”  has pretty much disappeared, if not from all hearts and minds, then at least from Church writings. Antisemitism has reorganized around other ideas, particularly anti-Zionism and hatred of Israel, but these have nothing to do with Catholicism. In fact, in the battle that the Jews are fighting against the new antisemitism, the Catholics are most often on their side; they are their allies. 
The Algemeiner: Who conceived the idea of the meeting at the United Nations? 
Bernard-Henri Lévy: The Vatican, in part. But also the International Jewish Committee for Interreligious Consultations (IJCIC), which I think is accurately described as a coalition of the major Jewish groups in the United States. The architect of the event is Michael Landau, a leader in the American Jewish community. One thing of which I am completely certain is that the two sides have an equally strong interest in seeing the alliance prosper, something that is really critical in the terrifying world we now live in. Together Jews and Catholics will have to confront the looming barbarism. And not just us, of course; we are going to need millions of practitioners of other religions, too, as well as nonbelievers. Joining me at the UN on Wednesday afternoon to take stock of the past half-century and look forward to the next will be Archbishop Bernardito Auza, Permanent Observer of the Holy See to the United Nations and Bishop William Murphy of Rockville Centre, New York, as well as prominent Jewish leaders, among them Jonathan Sacks, former chief rabbi of the United Kingdom. 
The Algemeiner: Was it in connection with this event that you met with Pope Francis on December 9th? 
Bernard-Henri Lévy: Yes, but I was not alone. Accompanying me were Michael Landau and Chief Rabbi David Rosen, head of the American Jewish Committee’s department of interreligious affairs. It was an interesting experience. Three Jews chatting with the leader of the Catholic Church and then touring the Vatican’s chapels and its diverse and varied corridors of power. Landau and Rosen are what we usually call Orthodox Jews; I am a “Jew by affirmation.” In fact, I recently finished a tribute to Jewish thought entitled Le Génie du Judaïsme (The Spirit of Judaism) that will come out this winter in France and later here. Neither Rosen, Landau, nor I had the feeling, while walking through the Vatican, of finding ourselves on “foreign ground.” 
The Algemeiner: What did you and the Pope talk about? 
Bernard-Henri Lévy: It was a very short meeting that occurred in the context of his general weekly audience. But I had the chance to ask him about a striking interview that he gave a few months ago to a Catalan daily in which he said that “inside every Christian is a Jew,” and that although he performs the Eucharist every day as a Christian, it is “as a Jew” that he prays over the Psalms of David. I also tried to draw his attention to a monastery in Iraq that I visited recently, a monastery that four heroic monks have refused to abandon as long as even one Christian remains on the Plain of Nineveh, and despite the fact that the monastery is practically within shooting distance of ISIS. L’Osservatore Romano put photos of the meeting online. In one of them you can clearly see the pictures of the four monks that I had brought along to give him. The actual working meeting was held afterwards with Pietro Parolin, the Vatican’s secretary of state and second in command, as it were. 
The Algemeiner: What was the purpose of that meeting? 
Bernard-Henri Lévy: To prepare for the ceremony at the United Nations on December 16. And to think about follow-up — that is, what we need to do to ensure that the symposium is not just another meeting with no tomorrow. But also to think of ways to save those four monks I just mentioned, along with their monastery, which is one of the oldest and most venerable in the world. It would be premature to say anything more about that here, but perhaps I will be able to by the end of next week, when I will be giving a public talk at the 92nd Street Y. If things have fallen into place by then, I will go into greater detail. In any event, I want to take this opportunity to invite your readers to this second event as well. I will be speaking twice in New York next week, first at the UN and the next day at the 92nd Street Y. What can I tell you? Between the killings in Paris, the daily terrorist crimes in Israel, the Trump phenomenon and all the rest, there is a lot to say! And I am going to try to say it. So, please, come!



***** UPDATED 16 DECEMBER 2015 WITH NEW LINK BELOW *****

Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Francis views his favorite blasphemous artwork

...and gives it his kosher seal of approval

'humble' meets blasphemy



Francis' alchemical dialogue between 
Catholic art and blasphemous Hasidic kitsch!

 (viewing takes place from 2 min 55 seconds until 4 minutes 25 seconds)


Francis saw his favorite blasphemous painting today in the Baptistery of St. John albeit for less than two minutes.  Watch the video above, Francis seems underwhelmed by it and more interested in the gold colored mosaics adorning the ceiling of the Baptistery than Chagall's piece of blasphemous kitsch.  Yet, every time he is asked and it has been many, what is his favorite painting, Francis replies without fail, "White Crucifixion by Marc Chagall."

Maremma News reported that Francis and Cardinal Joseph Betori were greeted in the Baptistery by the director of the The Art Institute of Chicago, Douglas Druick, and the director general of the Palazzo Strozzi, Arturo Galansino.  The reason for Francis taking in the mosaics on the ceiling with the blasphemous painting was that the two directors told Francis the White Crucifixion,  "was in dialogue with the 200 mosaics of the dome and of the apse, representing the message unity of unity between the ancient and the modern, the same spark of artists which transcends all time." You can't make stuff like this up.  Francis, "admired and commented to those present that the masterpiece by Marc Chagall (is his favorite) together with Caravaggio (who) is his favorite artist."

One interesting coincidence is that from the 9th of November to the 10th of November in 1938 the 'Night of Broken Glass' or Kristallnacht took place in Germany.  This in turn inspired Marc Chagall to paint this blasphemous piece of trash.  Yes you guessed it, Chagall's White Crucifixion was moved from the Palazzo Strozzi to the Baptistery on the 9th of November and Francis viewed it at the Baptistery on the 10th of November.  How numerically and magically charged!  So fitting!  Francis obsession with Kristallnacht according to our research goes back at least ten years. (see, Noche de los cristales rotos 2005)

Francis exited the Baptistery of St. John by going through La Porta del Paradiso (Door of Paradise or Heaven's Gate) to enter the Cathedral where he was meeting with the participants of the Fifth National Ecclesial Convention.   Can it get any more symbolic?  Viewing blasphemous junk will get one into heaven.  The topic of discussion at this year's convention and theme is, "In Jesus Christ the New Humanism".  Francis' full address can be read by clicking here.  It's the usual modernist claptrap he is always spouting off like the following words:
"The Church is not obsessed with power, it escapes from the temptations and thrones to be the Church with the face of a mother, but restless, close to the forgotten and to the imperfect, who think to build a field hospital which welcomes. I desire a happy Church with the face of my mother, who understands, accompanies, caresses.  You dream this Church, you believe in it, innovate it with freedom."

What about the Church desired by God?

Does that remind you of someone or something?

Who's always telling God that He is incorrect as is His word ?



More on the White Crucifixion

Maurice Pinay's posts on the White Crucifixion

Saturday, October 10, 2015

It's arrived!


Francis' favorite blasphemous painting has arrived in Italy.  According to John David Mooney, a former artist-in-residence at the Vatican Observatory at Castel Gandolfo, in Catholic New World's article, Art Institute of Chicago sending pope’s favorite painting to Italy,

“White Crucifixion” launched Chagall to do other paintings of the Jewish crucified Christ but none were so moving, says Chicago artist John David Mooney.

“This painting is different than all of his other crucifixions. He was doing a lot of them and they were all clearly Christ as a Jew,” Mooney said. “But this one is totally different and I think he knew that at the time.”

Mooney, who has a permanent sculpture on the lawn of the Adler Planetarium in Chicago and a permanent sculpture at Castel Gandolfo in Italy — the traditional summer home of popes — said it’s a timeless painting.

“It’s such a contemporary piece,” Mooney said because, within the painting, the Jews fleeing persecution end up in boats as refugees, much like those fleeing persecution in the Middle East today and trying to make their way to Europe.


...By painting a Jewish Christ, Chagall was sending a message to the “Christian” countries persecuting the Jews. Yet, at the same time he was speaking to all generations, Mooney believes.

But most of all there is hope in the work Chagall created. The ray of light coming down from the top of the painting represents the hope of God for his people.

“I really see it as a very, very pastoral painting,” Mooney said and a good painting for Pope Francis to use as a teaching tool.

“He has to teach the Gospel and he chose a painting that teaches the Gospel,” he said. “God is found in humanity and he’s accompanying humanity.”



The painting is part of an exhibition at the Palazzo Strozzi in Florence, Italy named, Divine Beauty: From Van Gogh to Chagall and Fontana and runs from 24 September 2015 to 24 January 2016.  It fits right in with the majority of the artwork in the exhibition due to most of the works being blasphemous.  If this isn't 'divine beauty' to a Catholic or to God, who finds it pleasing?   One of the days (between 9th & 13th of November) during the exhibition, the “White Crucifixion” will be moved to the Baptistery of St. John temporarily in order so Francis can view it in private during his one-day trip to Florence.


 This is what blasphemy looks like.

The explanation at the foot of the painting reads, "This painting, dated 1938, is a bold statement depicting the persecution of the Jews.  Chagall replaces Christ's loincloth with a prayer shawl and His crown of thorns with a kippah, adding figures in traditional garb, synagogues burning and people fleeing in fear.  That Pope Francis has declared it to be his favorite painting may be due to the bold interfaith spirit it exudes."


More on the White Crucifixion

Maurice Pinay's posts on the White Crucifixion

Sunday, February 15, 2015

Catholic Family News entertains readers with fairy tales while continuing to ignore the truth

...on the role played by Talmudists at Vatican II

John Vennari, the editor of Catholic Family News, reprinted an article in their most recent issue written by the late Jean Arfel (aka Jean Madiran, Jean-Louis Lagor).  The article, Rome's Secret Accord with the Jewish Leaders: A Deafening Silence can be read online by clicking here.  We can speculate as to why Mr. Arfel writes these negotiations were shrouded in mystery, happened in a synagogue and basement and were filled with all sorts of intrigue.  Perhaps he wasn't aware of what really happened?

Here's the Editor's Note which was published in Catholic Family News:
This is a landmark 1990 article from the eminent French Catholic writer Jean Madiran who supplies the background to Vatican II's new approach to modern Judaism.

Rome's Secret Accord with the Jewish Leaders: A Deafening Silence 
by Jean Madiran, Catholic Family News, February 2015

Why settle for a story when the truth of the matter has been so well documented?  For those who want to know what went actually down, there are two books shown below covering the same topic.  Which leads us to the question, why is Catholic Family News not reporting on the materials in these books?

for those who want the 'kosher' version

 for seekers of the truth

Any of the dear readers of Call Me Jorge... who wish to research the topic further can sift through the plethora of materials the American Jewish Committee has made available on their website.

Below we repost an entry from the Maurice Pinay blog which covers this same topic.  It is well worth taking the time to read the scanned in documents at the end of the entry.



Tuesday, March 29, 2011
Why traffic in storybook depictions?
On March 27, 1963 Cardinal Bea HIMSELF met with Rabbis Marc Tanenbaum and Abraham Heschel, representatives of the 'American' 'Jewish' Committee, in Boston in Cardinal Cushing's chancery, and discussed what "The Jews" wanted to happen at the Vatican II council. This is very well documented, easily accessed information (e.g. Spiritual Radical, Edward Kaplan). Cardinal Bea then went to the AJC headquarters in New York on March 31, 1963 to further discuss what "The Jews" wanted to happen at the council with President of the Central Conference of American Rabbis, Rabbi Albert G. Minda, Heschel and Tanenbaum (see document and image below). Further, Rabbi Heschel met with Pope Paul VI on the opening day of the third session of the council, Sept 14, 1964, to discuss what "The Jews" wanted to happen at the council. The Pope changed the originally scheduled day to accommodate the rabbi's religion (it was 'the Jewish Sabbath'). This is easily sourced, widely available information.

Cardinal Bea and the Pope himself met with Rabbi Heschel who confided to an Israeli reporter that his motive for making outrageous statements about 'going to Auschwitz rather than convert' was that he wanted to attack Christian souls. This is a well documented fact. And they made concessions to this hostile figure and the hostile organizations he represented in a Vatican II Council document. There are photographs of Heshel meeting Pope Paul VI in 1971 AFTER Heschel had made this admission of hostile intent which was well known in Rome.

There are photographs of Cardinal Shehan meeting with Zachariah Shuster (of the AJC and one of Malachi Martin's handlers) to discuss Vatican II; photos of Cardinal Spellman meeting with AJC directors. This barely scratches the surface of well-documented meetings that took place between Judaic organizations and their rabbis and cardinals and even the Pope leading up to Vatican II. There were many, many such meetings and they continue to this day, seemingly on a daily, or at least weekly basis.

Why do 'traditionalists' prefer the Malachi Martinesque, storybook version of history about 'a cold winter night sometime between 1962-63 when Cardinal Bea may have sent a representative to a mysterious meeting in a synagogue basement somewhere in Strasbourg which he neither confirmed or denied took place'? Why is this so much more alluring than the documented facts?

I believe what I've been told is true: there is an insufficient love for truth among these people.

Fr. Stephen Schmidt, S. J.; President of the Central Conference of American Rabbis, Rabbi Albert G. Minda; Rabbi Abraham J. Heschel; AJC Director of Interreligious Affairs, Rabbi Marc Tanenbaum with Cardinal Augustin Bea, March 31, 1963, AJC building, 165 E. 56th St., New York City




Friday, January 16, 2015

Fr. Joaquín Sáenz y Arriaga on L'abbé Roca's writings

The New Montinian Church 
by the Rev. Joaquin Sáenz y Arriaga, Ph.D. 
translated by Edgar A. Lucidi, M.D.

Fr. Joaquín Sáenz y Arriaga, was one of the authors who wrote under the pseudonym Maurice Pinay for the book, The Plot Against the Church, he also wrote another book, The New Montinian Church. In this work he quotes several of L'abbé Roca's texts which pertain to the post-Vatican II church.  Below are scans of the text mentioning Roca on pages 398 and 399.





The excommunicated L'abbé Roca (aka Canon Roca,  Paul Roca) wrote several books over his life.  All his works were placed on the Index Librorum Prohibitorum.  Some of his heretical works are listed below.

  • Le Christ, le pape et la démocratie Paris: Garnier frères, 1884 (2 edicions)
  • La crise fatale et le salut de l'Europe: étude critique sur les missions de M. de Saint-Yves Paris: Garnier frères, 1885 (5 edicions; 4a. ed., 1885)
  • La Fin de l'ancien monde, les nouveaux cieux et la nouvelle terre Paris: J. Lévy, 1886
  • Glorieux centenaire, 1889. Monde nouveau, nouveaux cieux, nouvelle terre, par l'auteur de "la Fin de l'ancien monde" Paris: A. Ghio, 1889
  • L'abbé Gabriel et Henriette sa fiancée, novel·la rosa que aparegué per capítols a L'Anti-clérical (1890-1891)

Friday, January 2, 2015

Where Francis' doctrine originates

To our knowledge, at Call Me Jorge..., the Maurice Pinay blog is the only place to offer any sort of explanation to as to what tradition Francis and Benedict XVI follow in their teachings.  We are in total agreement with the shrewd observations and conclusion drawn by Maurice Pinay.  Consider this a follow-up post to Francis invokes Pius XII in the name of modernism



Tuesday, December 16, 2014


Pharisee Pope Francis teaches for doctrine the contrivances of the rabbis

From Benedict XVI's favorite rabbi, Jacob Neusner (Judaism in the Beginning of Christianity, p.45)


Francis has delivered another sermon in which he chastises the common Catholic who is dismayed by radical changes in religion as "rigid" "Pharisees" (Pope Francis: Rigidity is a sign of a weak heart). This is an inversion of the Gospel of the Jesus Christ who chastised the Pharisees for their changes to God-ordained teaching which they replaced with their own made-up traditions, laws and doctrines ("teaching for doctrine the commandments of men").

Never did Christ speak to the common people, the victims of the Pharisees, with anything approaching the harsh judgement as He spoke to the Pharisees. Francis satanically inverts the Gospel with the luv and hugs he has for the rabbis (the direct religious heirs of the Pharisees, who are so rigid in their hateful rejection of Christ that Francis covers up his pectoral cross in their presence) and the harshness and palpable contempt he has for the common traditional Christian crushed by the Pharisees' heavy burdens.

But Francis really tips his anti-Christ hand when he follows up this shaming with a notion utterly alien to Christianity but germane to the hasidic ghetto:

“Even our life can become like that [ie Pharisaic], even our life. And sometimes, I confess something to you, when I have seen a Christian, a Christian of that kind, with a weak heart, not firm, not fixed on the rock—Jesus – and with such rigidness on the outside, I ask the Lord: ‘But Lord, throw a banana peel in front of them, so that they will take a good fall, and feel shame that they are sinners, and so encounter You, [and realize] that You are the Saviour. Many times a sin will make us feel shame, and make us encounter the Lord, Who pardons us, as the sick who were there and went to the Lord for healing.”

http://en.radiovaticana.va/news/2014/12/15/pope_francis_rigidity_is_a_sign_of_a_weak_heart/1114830

Here is Francis essentially saying that he hopes that the people who don't like radical 'Noahide' Novus Ordo changes will fall into sin and thereby "encounter the Lord." This notion is entirely foreign to Christianity, but to Hasidic Judaism it is of the essence:


Francis is teaching the essence of Hasidic Judaism and one of the root causes for the extreme depravity witnessed in every Hasidic community: that one must sin in order 'to come closer to God.'

Now, what's interesting about Pope Francis raising the example of Pope Pius XII in this context is that much of the groundwork for the 'Noahide' Novus Ordo revolution was laid during his pontificate. It was at this time that changes to the liturgy began with the alteration with the much hated (by the rabbis) Holy Week liturgy. It must also be noted that Pope Pius XII's confessor was Augustine Bea, who we have noted made it a personal project to get the rabbinic midrash the Poem of the Man God into circulation. Throughout The Poem ( a work which outrageously depicts Jesus Christ venerating the Pharisee Hillel) is the notion that "we sinners are more yielding to good" and that one should be "a big sinner" in order to repent.

But most telling of all is Francis' pharisaic rigidity with which he proclaims that it is "incomprehensible" that anyone would question "The Holocaust" unless they were insane. Here is rigid pharisaism par excellence.