Holocaustianity — a WJC-Vatican Partnership

Humble “Who am I to judge?” Francis has no problem judging others when it comes to those who question his religion.

“Those who deny the Holocaust are crazy!”

— Francis in interview with La Vanguardia —

The World Jewish Congress presents...

More:

• the holocaust has replaced the Crucifixion

• Everything you need to know about Francis in one photo

• Dr. Francis’ cure for the Holocaust is to #NeverForget

• The occult significance of Francis’ #WeRemember photo-op — a supermoon, the number eighteen, and the olive tree

“There are people who deny the Holocaust – still today. It's madness, but it happens. And it's incomprehensible.”

— Francis in interview with Ynet News —

Tall Tales from the Concentration Camps

#NeverForget the bars of soap

Don’t let the #Memory of the apple die

#WeRemeber Irene Zisblatt’s diamonds

Stefan Molyneux, the alt-right’s psychopath

psy·cho·path       a person suffering from chronic mental disorder
/ˈsīkəˌpaTH/          an unstable and aggressive person

The gnostic-satanism Molyneux taught his daughter.

(The Joe Rogan Experience #436, Stefan Molyneux @ 1:05:27, click here)

Molyneux’s mother’s Jewish family

Molyneux’s Jewish Supremacism — Jews have higher IQs*

*According to IQ Research, Israel was tied for 40th in the world out of 183 countries.
As if IQ means anything.

How Molyneux feels about Christianity & Christians

This guy is nuts he says Christians are responsible for the big-brother nanny state and on another podcast that Christians are our allies against the State.

Christians are corrupt

The insane mind of Molyneux: Is it white or black,

up or down, Mormonism is Christianity, etc...

‘I apologize for not tempering my criticism of religious doctrines with praise for positive aspects religious doctrines.’
Stefan Molyneux paraphrased on his forum

Have Ann Barnhardt and Eric Gajewski been listening to Benedict XVI???

Apparently not, as Benedict XVI once again publicly demonstrates he isn’t the Pontiff with his actions and words.

Eric ‘the Great Monarch’ Gajewski in his ‘Eagles Nest’ and
the potty mouth Zionist, Ann ‘♥'s usury’ Barnhardt

Two bloggers on the internet, who also produce a slew of interviews are the potty mouth Ann Barnhardt, who says such gems as usury is Godly and if you think otherwise you’re an anti-Semite not to mention closed her brokerage business under suspicious circumstances, and the head of the ‘Order of the Eagles’ Eric Gajewski who gives the commands but doesn’t take orders while he is awaiting for official approval from the church for his make-believe military order, are pushing the idea that there is no way that Francis is pope so therefore the pope is Benedict XVI.

One can if they so wish, peruse their blogs and find articles in the case of Gajewski and one maybe possibly more in Barnhardt’s situation.  Below we’ll quote from recent posts (17 March 2016 — Gajewski & 19 June 2016 — Barnhardt) of each blogger then quote from Benedict XVI’s speech given at the 65th anniversary of his ordination.

Gajewski starts, The Real Pope Speaks: Benedict XVI states Church in “Deep Crisis” Since Vatican II, with this graphic,

and finishes with this,

Now on to Barnhardt, who opens Vocem Alienorum: The Voice of Antipope Francis Bergoglio Is the Voice of A Stranger with this,

and concludes with this paragraph,

Apparently Benedict XVI hasn’t read the memo as the other day on the celebration of his 65th ordination he said the following words,

Thanks above all to you, Holy Father! Your goodness, from the first moment of your election, in each moment of my life here, moves me, it really carries me interiorly. More than in the Vatican Gardens, with their beauty, your goodness as the place where I live: I feel protected. Thank you, too, for the word of appreciation, for everything. And we hope that you will carry us all forward on this way of Divine Mercy, showing the way of Jesus, toward Jesus, towards God.

Does that sound like Benedict XVI never resigned his office?  Or he did it under duress?  Is he unhappy with the Second Vatican Council or the fruits of it?  Instead, his words speak of Francis’ goodness and how it sustains him interiorly!  He goes on to say Francis’ goodness is more beautiful than the Vatican Gardens and makes him feel protected!

Do proponents of this zany thinking ever read or listen to what Benedict XVI says?  Or do they start from a preconceived conclusion and filter out all information which doesn’t fit it?

It’ll be interesting to see what is revealed in the upcoming interview book by Peter Seewald about Bendict XVI’s resignation, his thoughts on the election of Jorge Mario Bergoglio, and his breakup of the ‘gay lobby’ in the Vatican.  Call Me Jorge... is guessing that Gajewski and Barnhardt either ignore or cherry-pick statements out of context from this soon (September 2016) to be released book.

We hope and pray that Catholics are not listening to bloggers like Barnhardt who is new to this bizarre theory and Gajewski who has been espousing it since July 2014 if not before.  People should stop paying attention to and stop supporting pied-pipers such as the two mentioned above.  Being a Catholic begins with prayer, the sacraments, and reading Catholic teachings. 

more on Gajewski:

• The 'Great Monarch' caught redhanded buying followers

• more news from the Pfeiffervillains

Antonio Spadaro’s thoughts on Francis and the method of his reign

The modernist, Rev. Antonio Spadaro, whom has interviewed Francis more than once and written a book, La mia porta è sempre aperta (My Door is always Open), about these conversations offers his insights in to who Francis is and what makes his pontificate.  He singles out five characteristics of Francis’ reign and explains each of them.  They are:

— A pontificate of discernment and «incomplete thought»
— A pontificate of tension between spirit and institution
— A pontificate of frontier and challenges
— A pontificate for a Church, «field hospital»
— A pontificate of geopolitical impact

What is interesting is here is a Jesuit, Spadaro (often referred to as a Jesuit’s Jesuit), justifying even excusing his fellow Jesuit’s un-Catholic behaviors and concluding that none of this is really planned.  Do these revolutionaries really tell themselves the lie that they are on a mission from God as they destroy Catholic tradition?  Or are these men so filled with hubris they no longer care about Our Lord nor fear Him?  If Antonio Spadaro had wanted to be accurate he would have started the blog entry with this:

— A pontificate where the jaw is always in movement

...and proceeded from there.  Alas, he did not.

The post is still an insightful one as the reader can see glimpses of the insanity of a modernist,

• CyberTeologia, For Pope Francis the world is always in movement: 5 traits of his pontificate

Francis has a fever and the only prescription is more Evangelii Gaudium!

Some of the lowlights of Francis' Apostolic Exhortation, Evangelii Gaudium in no particular order:

"Inequality is the root of social ills.” (§ 202)

“Today in many places we hear a call for greater security. But until exclusion and inequality in society and between peoples is reversed, it will be impossible to eliminate violence." (§ 59)

“I dream of a ‘missionary option,’ that is, a missionary impulse capable of transforming everything, so that the Church’s customs, ways of doing things, times and schedules, language and structures can be suitably channeled for the evangelization of today’s world rather than for her self-preservation.” (§ 27)

“I want a Church which is poor and for the poor. They have much to teach us. … We need to let ourselves be evangelized by them. … The new evangelization is an invitation to acknowledge the saving power at work in their lives and to put them [the poor] at the centre of the Church’s pilgrim way.” (§ 198)

“Such an economy kills. How can it be that it is not a news item when an elderly homeless person dies of exposure, but it is news when the stock market loses two points? This is a case of exclusion. Can we continue to stand by when food is thrown away while people are starving? This is a case of inequality.” (§ 53)

“I encourage financial experts and political leaders to ponder the words of one of the sages of antiquity: ‘Not to share one’s wealth with the poor is to steal from them and to take away their livelihood. It is not our own goods which we hold, but theirs.’” (§ 57)

“A constant tension exists between fullness and limitation. Fullness evokes the desire for complete possession, while limitation is a wall set before us. Broadly speaking, ‘time’ has to do with fullness as an expression of the horizon which constantly opens before us, while each individual moment has to do with limitation as an expression of enclosure. People live poised between each individual moment and the greater, brighter horizon of the utopian future as the final cause which draws us to itself. Here we see a first principle for progress in building a people: time is greater than space.” (§ 222)

“A supposed soundness of doctrine or discipline leads instead to a narcissistic and authoritarian elitism, whereby instead of evangelizing, one analyzes and classifies others, and instead of opening the door to grace, one exhausts his or her energies in inspecting and verifying. In neither case is one really concerned about Jesus Christ or others. These are manifestations of an anthropocentric immanentism. It is impossible to think that a genuine evangelizing thrust could emerge from these adulterated forms of Christianity.” (§ 94)

to be continued...