Showing posts with label fruits of Vatican II. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fruits of Vatican II. Show all posts

Friday, November 24, 2017

Malachi Martin would be proud


Malachi Martin once said, “As you know it's theologically possible for God to have become a cow if he decided. He could be incarnated in a cow. But even if he had been incarnated in a cow, we men would have taken over, that's the extent.”


Occultist, Tom Herck’s Holy Cow inside the church of Saint John 
the Baptist of Kuttekoven in Borgloon, Belgium.

“Local Catholics in a Belgian town are outraged as a cruciform cow has been erected as art at the center of a consecrated Catholic church. They are urging the local bishop to have it removed and offer public prayers of reparation.

The “art” exhibit by Tom Herck is to be displayed until early December in the small parish church of Saint John the Baptist of Kuttekoven, in the Flemish town of Borgloon.

[...]

The “artist” went through the grueling process of actually nailing the 500 kg corpse of a cow to a cross before covering it with silicone paint: it is the resulting mold that hangs, “crucified” in the center of the church as a sneering mockery of one of the most sacred images of the Catholic faith: that of the crucified God and Saviour of mankind.

In contemporary art, by far the most important part of an opus resides in the “discourse” – or, more appropriately, gibberish – that surrounds it. The installation in Borgloon, Tom Herck is happy to explain, aims to make a stand against modern wastefulness. The cow on the cross, surmounting a basin containing 5,000 litres of milk, is supposed to symbolize industrial breeding and thrown-away food. Visitors are welcomed with beef and cheese appetizers.

The choice of a church supposedly points to wasted architectural space in a time of housing shortage. Herck openly admits he is particularly seeking to attract attention to the “innumerable” churches that remain empty in Flanders on Sundays because, he says, the Flemish are no longer interested in “insufferably tedious Masses.”

Katholiek Forum say the local diocese has been slow to act on the blasphemous installation in the church of Saint John the Baptist, which has never been deconsecrated and where religious services are still held. They say the “crucified cow” is a “satanic image and a disgusting insult to God and Catholicism.”

“We are disappointed by Patrick Hoogmartens. He has done nothing against this self-styled work of art because he wants to avoid confrontation. He is terrified by the media. That is why we came to pray here, because Catholicism has been dishonored,” said Dries Goethals.

Shortly after the installation was opened to the public at the beginning of the month, the diocese of Hasselt published this reaction as its sole response:

The diocese of Hasselt is astonished at the ‘Holy Cow’ exhibition in the church of Kuttekoven. We are always ready to collaborate in dialogue with art projects in a church, and we can certainly appreciate humor. But a cow on the cross, on the spot where Christ hung on the cross, that is to our mind really a bridge too far. Transformation is a trend in the art world. Deep symbolism, such as that of the cross, cannot however receive another meaning just like that. That can be hurtful or come across as a will to ridicule. Even though the church of Kuttekoven is soon to be deconsecrated, we find this way of changing its destination unbecoming. Or should we perhaps today consider certain forms of art as the ‘holy cow’?

The statement was published on November 7 and was not followed by any form of action on the part of the Catholic diocese of Hasselt to put an end to the defilement of the image of the crucified Christ in a church that, to LifeSite’s knowledge, still belongs to it. If not, similarly to other religious buildings that are property of the State in Belgium, the Catholic Church at least has full sovereignty over its use. ”
source: LifeSiteNews, ‘Crucified cow’ on display at center of Catholic church, locals outraged

the locals are fed up with this blasphemy

Wednesday, November 15, 2017

The Pope Video — Season 1 Episode 1 Version 2


The Vatican has released a new version of their inaugural The Pope Video.  One can watch it if they so wish below as well as the original video.  The two videos are identical until they reach the 1 minute 6 seconds mark.  The new changes last until the 1 minute 22 seconds mark and are footage of Francis glad handling heads of heretical religions and giving out spiritual hugs. Regardless, the message is still one of modernism — a false one-world religion.

Who knew that Francis was a historical revisionist?

Then → Now

Then → Now


It’s a modern day version of Stalin’s vanishing commissar!


 the new version (15 November 2017)



original version (6 January 2016)


Wednesday, November 1, 2017

BBC asks, “Is the Pope Catholic?”


There are errors galore in this BBC piece but it is interesting in the sense that the mainstream media is having to publicly ask the question and reassure its listeners in the affirmative.


BBC, ‘There’s never been a more catholic 
Pope than Francis in recent memory!’






Related:

Monday, September 4, 2017

straight out of Colombia — a rapper nun


Sister María Valentina de los Ángeles as a member of The Eucharistic Communicators of the Heavenly Father will sing the official song for Francis’ trip to Colombia as he greats the crowds who show up to watch the circus.

Holy? No, she’s a gangster leading people to Jesus!


an official song the sisters will be singing



another official song the sisters will be singing



Sister María Valentina de los Ángeles spreading immodesty




Related:

Tuesday, August 29, 2017

Tuesday, August 15, 2017

‘street theology’

STREET THEOLOGY: The de-Christianization or Great Escape from the reality of the post-modern Church from Vatican II to Pope Francis.  The cover portrays Francis as taking a selfie while riding a skateboard — this is accurate as Francis is a revolutionary who teaches not the Catholic Faith but the contrivances of the rabbis.


This is a book published in 2016 by one of the students of the late Romano Amerio (a critic of the Second Vatican Council), Professor Enrico Maria Radaelli.  His thesis is that ‘street theology’ like ‘street art’ — sneaking inside great art and museums these days — is working it’s way into the post-modern church under the guise of saving the church and you.  This guise is the opposite of what is taking place which is nothing less than the destruction of Catholic institutions and morals. 
Radaelli rightfully denounces theses destroyers of Christianity and ‘street theologians’ citing Psalm 73:
“They have annihilated a people, millions are exterminated, and in the meantime they talk of ecological problems and of mercy by putting [church] doctrine underneath the carpet with the dust. ... Just as the Psalm prophesied: They thought, ‘To destroy us all’; They have burned all the shrines of God in the land.”

The world is now one of fantasy and hyper-confusion where the eternal truths proclaimed by the Church are no longer proclaimed and in fact are ridiculed.  There is a reason for the vagueness of documents flowing from the Vatican which can be read a myriad of confusing ways depending on the perspective of the reader.  This Talmudic politically correct Novus Ordo which seeks to escape from reality leads one directly into the schizophrenia of noahidism.  Pray for those pewsitters in the Novus Ordo who are being inculcated with this ‘street theology’ that they may wake from the nightmare.


The presentation of Street Theology written by Professor Enrico Maria Radaelli at the Festival di Fede & Cultura 2016 — interview with Msgr. Antonio Livi

Saturday, August 12, 2017

Pro-homosexual Bishop Antônio Carlos Cruz Santos explains how he will runs diocese of Caicó





Here we listen to Bishop Antônio Carlos Cruz Santos give his Novus Ordo version of what the church is and how he will run the diocese of Caicó.  He mentions that his predecessor (Bishop Manuel Tavares de Araújo) signed the Pact of the Catacombs, sold the bishop’s palace (aka the fortress), and moved to a more simple residence then proceeded to make the focus of his ministries the poor and the peripheries (ala Francis).  Cruz Santos clarifies by what is meant by peripheries — it is not just geographical but also means bringing the Novus Ordo to drug addicts and people who are shunned because of the gender they identify as.  Then, Cruz Santos explains that catholic means universal so it has to include everyone.  Next he goes on to decry human trafficking for sex workers, illegal adoptions, and slave labor but has the chutzpah to blames all of this on those who are silent and say they know nothing about it.  In Cruz Santos’ book silence equals consent even when one has never seen human trafficking.   Finally this sad man says that he wants to walk together with the people of his diocese.

This pro-homosexual bishop spews heresies out faster than Francis does in this video.  He has a heretical ideas of what the Catholic Church is; that the Church discriminates against sinners even if they do not support the sin; rebels against the Church as a teacher; believes the in the concept of sin as defined by the Marxist liberation theology; believes people who morally discriminate are committing a social sin (i.e. people who don’t want their children around drug addicts or homosexuals); and doesn’t believe in the need for individual redemption.

Gee, who does this bishop remind us of...Francis?  We’ll he should as that’s who promoted him to be the bishop of Caicó, Brazil in 2014.


Related:

Monday, July 17, 2017

the new evangelization in France


The ordination of Manoj Visuvasam performed at the Rodez Cathedral (Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Rodez) in Rodez, France



Ah, isn’t the unity of liturgical diversity great!


More:

Monday, March 20, 2017

Thursday, March 16, 2017

Bishop Marcelo Sánchez Sorondo’s novel interpretation of St. Thomas Aquinas’ moral principle of “double effect”




LifeSite: [Ehrlich] himself has written about his agenda, that he wants sterilization [to decrease the population]. […]
Sorondo: You have to change your criteria if you want to progress in life. You need to dialogue with all cultures of the world, as the Pope said. […] And we have reached agreements that are very important. [Our partners] want to defend human liberty, human life, and peace against the new forms of slavery. And thanks to the invitation of people that your [pro-life-and-pro-family] people don’t want us to invite — [such as] Ban Ki-Moon, Geoffrey Sachs — we have achieved what those who defend the family always talk about but never achieve at all.
We, on the other hand, have achieved…that the new objectives for sustainable development…we established target 8.6 [sic, it’s actually 8.7], that is to eradicate the new forms of slavery. And that is more important for the family than all that stuff that they do.
Understand?
LifeSite: Ok, Ok. 
Sorondo: You have to understand that. It is important that you understand that. You are a rational human being and reason must come before prejudices.
LifeSite: Well, I also have a doctorate in philosophy, so…
Sorondo: In what philosophy?
LifeSite: St. Thomas…
Sorondo: So, with reason, St. Thomas spoke about the principle of the “double effect.” What is it?
LifeSite: It’s when a certain action has an effect which the agent of the action had not intended, then this [second] effect, for example, does not fall under a moral judgement.
Sorondo:  Well, that’s a complicated way of saying it. It is easier to say that if an action has two effects, if the positive effect is greater than the negative effect, then you can do it.
LifeSite: No, that’s not the principle of double effect.
Sorondo: Then you have not understood the principle of the double effect. [...] You have to form your mind. And you have to understand St. Thomas better.

source for video & text: LifeSiteNews, ON TAPE: Did this bishop just reveal the real reason he invites pro-abort extremists to the Vatican?

Tuesday, March 7, 2017

The shoah business, noahide promoting Donald Wuerl speaks about his fellow traditionalist and boss, Francis

Who’s the shoah business man?


Below is a transcript of the answer Donald Wuerl gave in a recent interview with Gerard O’Connell to the question of what he thought Francis’ accomplishments in his first four years were.  Notice that Wuerl says Francis great contribution has been reconnecting the church to the (Talmudic) energy of Vatican II and that Francis has refocused the church back onto this (Talmudic) path.  Both Wuerl and Francis are modernists and rabbinical traditionalists.


(Underlines are Call Me Jorge...’s for emphasis.)
I think his great contribution to date has been the reconnecting of the church with the energy of the Second Vatican Council, the energy coming out of that council. I was a student, studying theology when that council was going on and we were all caught up in the excitement of aggiornamento—renewal.
I think what happened next was that following the council there were some exaggerations. Theologically there was the hermeneutic of discontinuity; liturgically there were all kinds of experimentation. And in a way what got lost was the council’s call for us to return our focus to the primacy of love as the engine driving the church, her teaching and her outreach.
John Paul II was the great refocusing moment in the life of the church to get us back on track and say no to the exaggerations and discontinuity. Pope Benedict put the nail in the coffin on the discontinuity.
Now comes Pope Francis who’s saying, “Why don’t we pick up where we left off: collegiality, synodality.” The synodality that Paul VI initiated has flowered under Francis. Those two synods on the family were unlike any of the other synods prior to them because they actually invited the bishops into the process in a transparent, open way.
Then came the emphasis in “Amoris Laetitia.” It told us that we have to get back, as the council said, to a moral theology that rests on scripture and Jesus’ command to love and to the virtues that are the signs of a moral life, not the rigid following of the letter of the law.
So, when I look back over these four years, I see that Francis has accomplished all this refocusing, even though we have a long, long way to go to begin to change the direction of an institution as big as the Catholic Church and to get it focused back again on the path that I believe the council set out on. I think what he has done is already a huge accomplishment.”

Friday, February 24, 2017

A shaman visits Francis at the Vatican and works her sorcery during a private audience


Earlier last week at the Vatican, Francis had a private audience with ‘indigenous peoples’ who were attending the United Nations’ Third Global Meeting of the Indigenous Peoples’ Forum for Investing in Rural People organized by the International Fund Agricultural Development (IFAD) in Rome, Italy.  When they were assembled for this private audience, Francis delivered a speech, then went around the room and personally greeted each attendee.  As would be expected with ‘Indigenous Peoples’, and we are using that term very loosely, they practiced a hodgepodge of pagan religions.  One encounter Francis had caught our attention.  It is shown below.


 What is the heck is happening?


Who is this woman and what is she doing?  To us at Call Me Jorge... she appears to be a shaman working some sort of sorcery.  Well, we did a bit of digging around and found out that she is a member of the Amaicha del Valle settlement in Valles Calchaquíes, Tucumán, Argentina.  


A photo from the United Nations’ Third Global Meeting of the Indigenous Peoples’ Forum for Investing in Rural People organized by the International Fund Agricultural Development (IFAD) in Rome, Italy.


The two circled people, in the picture above, are from the Amaicha del Valle settlement.  The man is Dr. Eduardo Alfredo Nieva and the woman is the one who performed the incantation on Francis.  Dr. Eduardo Alfredo Nieva is the commissioner of the Amaicha del Valle settlement.  They are holding a bottle of wine because Dr. Nieva runs a community winery (Sumak Kawsay means ‘good living’ in the Quechua tongue and is precept of the Pachamama religion) which he started with the help of one of Francis’ favorite pet causes, micro-usury.  During this trip to Rome, Dr. Nieva helped secure an additional 50 million dollar loan to the people in rural Argentina.  He also gave a bottle of Sumak Kawsay to Francis when they met (see video below, It’s pagan day at the Vatican!).


As you can see, it’s the same woman.


The people of the Amaicha del Valle settlement are pagans as they believe in a multitude of gods. The four gods of primary importance are the husband and wife tandem — Pacha Kamaq (creator of the world) & Pachamama (mother earth) — and their two children — Inti (the sun) & Mama Killa (the moon).  Every year in the Amaicha del Valle settlement they hold a six day festival for Pachamama the mother earth goddess.


Dr. Nieva participating in the pagan Pachamama ritual.


Dr. Nieva has high hopes for this religious festival, “we are already preparing everything needed for the national holiday of the pachamama that will take place as every year in our central square.”   Other than photos, the only reports from the local Tucumán press has been that Francis thanked the two for the visit and the gift, then sent his greetings to the people of the Amaicha del Valle settlement.


It’s pagan day at the Vatican!



So here we have Francis having a private audience with a United Nations’ group.  This same United Nations which pushes all sorts of anti-Catholic causes is also selling the belief in pagan deities in their children publications by equating belief in Pachamama as environmentalism.  So what do others in the Novus Ordo church think of Pachamama?


On 17 January 2015 in Chile on the occasion of the consecration of the new diocesan bishop of Arica, Bishop Moisés Atisha, after the service in the cathedral finished, all the bishops assisting including the Apostolic Nuncio and the Cardinal archbishop of Santiago poured outside into the area directly in front of the cathedral and participated in Pachamama worship.  The Pachamama shaman placed a rug on the ground and proceeded to offer coca leaves, seeds, water and fermented chicha (corn alcohol).  These items were being offered to the deities Pachamama (mother earth), Inti (the sun) and the Malkus (mountain spirits).  As can be seen from the photos below, the assembled bishops participated in this offering.  After the offering was complete the witch then placed multi-colored necklaces onto the bishops.


“What then?  Do I say, that what is offered in sacrifice to idols, is any thing?  Or, that the idol is any thing?  But the things which the heathens sacrifice, they sacrifice to devils, and not to God.  And I would not that you should be made partakers with devils.  You cannot drink the chalice of the Lord, and the chalice of devils: you cannot be partakers of the table of the Lord, and of the table of devils.”



The witch doctor prepares his offering.

  The witch begins his sorcery.

Bishop Cristian Contreras, bishop of Melipilla (Chile), participates in the rituals.

 Bishop Atisha, the new bishop of Arica does as well.

Bishop Ivo Scapolo, the Apostolic Nuncio in Chile gets in on the worship.

Offering fermented chicha (corn alcohol) to the pagan gods.

Bishop Atisha gets his noahide colored necklace.

If one is interested in more photos from this event (click here).


Cardinal Ravasi participating in Pachamama ritual in 2015



Did these prelates tell Francis of their participation in the pagan Pachamama rituals and rave over them?  Or maybe Francis has a deeper connection to this pantheistic gnostic religion back to when he was Jorge Mario Bergoglio in Argentina?

In his address to Representatives of Indigenous Peoples, (15 February 2017) at the private audience he said, “I believe that the central issue is how to reconcile the right to development, both social and cultural, with the protection of the particular characteristics of indigenous peoples and their territories.  This is especially clear when planning economic activities which may interfere with indigenous cultures and their ancestral relationship to the earth.”  Is this not a clear endorsement of non-Christian religions?

Francis continued later, “A second aspect concerns the development of guidelines and projects which take into account indigenous identity, with particular attention to young people and women; not only considering them, but including them!”  Francis then proceeded to put his money where his mouth was by having the female shaman work her ‘magic’ on himself.

Regardless it’s obvious, when one looks at the photos below, that not only does Francis have a deep respect for the pagan Pachamama religion, he like his bishops is an enthusiastic believer in “sitting at the table of devils.”


Below are some and we stress this is only a small sampling of the photos available from the L'Osservatore Romano’s photographic service database for this pagan sorcery ritual. 

(To see all the photos, click here.)

(click photos to enlarge)

 The wine hand off goes down.

Nice to meet you can I work some ‘magic’ on you?

 This is amusing.

 She’s feeling a spirit.

That’s not “patty-cake, patty-cake, baker’s man” being played!

 She’s communing with the spirit of Vatican II.

 Francis is really getting into this sorcery thing, look at the concentration on his face!

 She’s channeling another spirit into his head.

It’s crowded in that fat body.

 The possession is almost complete!

 Uh oh, the spirit is trying to escape through his ears.

 She’ll hold this pose for some time.

 Whatever she’s doing it’s serious.

 She’s using all her shaman abilities now!

 More incantations...

 Final instructions to the spirit.

 Waking Francis from his trance.

 The spirit says thanks for the new body.

 The sorcery is complete.

 Francis the rabbinical traditionalist goes onto the next pagan.

Thursday, January 19, 2017

Why don’t they just go ahead and declare the heresiarch a saint already?

Francis in front of a statue of heresiarch, Martin Luther, at a private audience
with Swedish Lutherans in Paul VI Hall on 13 October 2016.


A few quotes which demonstrate how the Novus Ordo thinks about the excommunicated heresiarch, Martin Luther.  As always the underline are our for emphasis.


“At the same time, we keep alive in our hearts sincere contrition for our faults. In this spirit, we recalled in Lund that the intention of Martin Luther five hundred years ago was to renew the Church, not divide her. The gathering there gave us the courage and strength, in our Lord Jesus Christ, to look ahead to the ecumenical journey that we are called to walk together.”


“In this regard, the Second Vatican Council, which bound together, in an irrevocable manner, the ecumenical commitment to restoring Christian unity and the renewal of the Catholic Church, has made an essential contribution, such that we can state, even in this respect, that in the Second Vatican Council, Martin Luther would have “found his own council.” The council would have appealed to him in the time in which he lived.

Danilo Bogoni : Through newly issued stamps, the Vatican continues to clear the pages of history previously considered, at the least embarrassing: in 2011 the centenary of the unification of Italy, in this 2017 soon the beginning of the Lutheran Reformation. [CMJ - Luther’s Revolt] The issue of which a few years ago was unthinkable with the mark of the crossed keys.
Mauro Olivieri : We have to try to understand the present time and be interpreters of the messages that the Holy Father wishes to convey; with the help and understanding of my Superiors of the Governorate, we develop the idea of a modern philately [CMJ - philately is the collection and study of postage stamps], which mark the important moments of history: no doubt the issue dedicated to the 500th anniversary of the Protestant Reformation [CMJ - Protestant Revolt] marks the rapprochement and overcoming of mutual misunderstandings between Christians, and the philately there is.


In Benedict XVI we have a Pope better than any which even Martin Luther could have imagined. A Pope who sees it as one of his first priorities to give testimony to Jesus Christ with all the powers of reason and of historical insight. How much recognition he found in the entire world as the Pope of Theologians, whose legacy we in Regensburg are allowed to treasure, preserve, and carry into the future in such particularly qualified manner.”


“Separating that which is polemical from the theological insights of the Reformation, Catholics are now able to hear Luther’s challenge for the Church of today, recognising him as a “witness to the gospel” (From Conflict to Communion 29). And so after centuries of mutual condemnations and vilification, in 2017 Lutheran and Catholic Christians will for the first time commemorate together the beginning of the Reformation.”
 —Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity, Resources for THE WEEK OF PRAYER FOR CHRISTIAN UNITY and throughout the year 2017, 31 May 2016


I think that the intentions of Martin Luther were not mistaken. He was a reformer. Perhaps some methods were not correct. But in that time, if we read the story of the Pastor, a German Lutheran who then converted when he saw reality – he became Catholic – in that time, the Church was not exactly a model to imitate. There was corruption in the Church, there was worldliness, attachment to money, to power...and this he protested. Then he was intelligent and took some steps forward justifying, and because he did this. And today Lutherans and Catholics, Protestants, all of us agree on the doctrine of justification. On this point, which is very important, he did not err. He made a medicine for the Church, but then this medicine consolidated into a state of things, into a state of a discipline, into a way of believing, into a way of doing, into a liturgical way and he wasn’t alone; there was Zwingli, there was Calvin, each one of them different, and behind them were who? Principals! We must put ourselves in the story of that time. It’s a story that’s not easy to understand, not easy. Then things went forward, and today the dialogue is very good. That document of justification I think is one of the richest ecumenical documents in the world, one in most agreement.


Medieval theologians used to say in Latin, that the Church is always in need of reform,” Ecclesia semper reformanda, the Pope said, receiving waves of applause that rippled through the Paul VI Hall where around a thousand Lutheran pilgrims were gathered: “This is what progress and maturing is about and the Church progresses, matures and so many small and not so small Church reforms moved, wanted to move along this path, some reforms were not successful, they were too much. Human things never are but reformation is an ecclesial process, that is what I mean. The question was: ‘who do you see as the Church’s the Churches’ and history’s greatest reformers?,” Francis said repeating the question. “I would say,” he continued, “that the Church’s greatest reformers are the saints, in other words the men and women who follow the Word of the Lord and practice it. This is the path we need to take, this is what reforms the church and they are great reformers, they may not be theologians, they may not have studied, they may be humble but these people’s soul is steeped in the Gospel, it’s full of it and they are the ones who successfully reform the Church. Both in the Lutheran and Catholic Churches there are saints, men and women with a holy heart who follow the Gospel: they are the Church’s reformers.



I feel much freer now that I am certain the pope is the Antichrist.