gnosticism from Dr. Taylor Marshall

The FSSP — Opus Judei ex-Episcopalian priest podcaster teaches his listeners gnosticism from his car in Texas but tells them it’s Catholicism!

**** UPDATE 17 MAY 2020 ****

THANKS TO THE KIND SOUL WHO INFORMED US THAT TAYLOR MARSHALL PULLED THIS VIDEO AND SENT IT TO US

 888 is the number of Jesus

What does the Catholic Encyclopedia have to say about Taylor Marshall’s gnostic gematria?

“Suffice it to note here that although the Fathers repeatedly condemned the magical use of numbers which had descended from Babylonian sources to the Pythagoreans and Gnostics of their times, and although they denounced any system of their philosophy which rested upon an exclusively numerical basis, still they almost unanimously regarded the numbers of Holy Writ as full of mystical meaning, and they considered the interpretation of these mystical meanings as an important branch of exegesis. To illustrate the caution with which they proceeded it will be sufficient to refer to one or two notable examples. St. Irenæus discusses at length the Gnostic numerical interpretation of the holy name Jesus as the equivalent of 888, and he claims that by writing the name in Hebrew characters an entirely different interpretation is necessitated.”

entry Numbers, USE OF, IN THE CHURCH, p. 151, The Catholic Encyclopedia: An International Work of Reference on the Constitution, Doctrine, Discipline, and History of the Catholic Church, Volume 11, (1913).

According to St. Irenæus people like Marshall who teach this crap are “the highest point of blasphemy”

Sige Relates to Marcus the Generation of the Twenty-Four Elements and of Jesus. Exposure of These Absurdities 

2. But Jesus, he affirms, has the following unspeakable origin. From the mother of all things, that is, the first Tetrad; there came forth the second Tetrad, after the manner of a daughter; and thus an Ogdoad was formed, from which, again, a Decad proceeded: thus was produced a Decad and an Ogdoad. The Decad, then, being joined with the Ogdoad, and multiplying it ten times, gave rise to the number eighty; and, again, multiplying eighty ten times, produced the number eight hundred. Thus, then, the whole number of the letters proceeding from the Ogdoad [multiplied] into the Decad, is eight hundred and eighty-eight. This is the name of Jesus; for this name, if you reckon up the numerical value of the letters, amounts to eight hundred and eighty-eight. Thus, then, you have a clear statement of their opinion as to the origin of the supercelestial Jesus. Wherefore, also, the alphabet of the Greeks contains eight Monads, eight Decads, and eight Hecatads, which present the number eight hundred and eighty-eight, that is, Jesus, who is formed of all numbers; and on this account He is called Alpha and Omega, indicating His origin from all. And, again, they put the matter thus: If the first Tetrad be added up according to the progression of number, the number ten appears. For one, and two, and three, and four, when added together, form ten; and this, as they will have it, is Jesus. Moreover, Chreistus, he says, being a word of eight letters, indicates the first Ogdoad, and this, when multiplied by ten, gives birth to Jesus (888). And Christ the Son, he says, is also spoken of, that is, the Duodecad. For the name Son, (υιός) contains four letters, and Christ (Chreistus) eight, which, being combined, point out the greatness of the Duodecad. But, he alleges, before the Episemon of this name appeared, that is Jesus the Son, mankind were involved in great ignorance and error. But when this name of six letters was manifested (the person bearing it clothing Himself in flesh, that He might come under the apprehension of man's senses, and having in Himself these six and twenty-four letters), then, becoming acquainted with Him, they ceased from their ignorance, and passed from death unto life, this name serving as their guide to the Father of truth. For the Father of all had resolved to put an end to ignorance, and to destroy death. But this abolishing of ignorance was just the knowledge of Him. And therefore that man (Anthropos) was chosen according to His will, having been formed after the image of the [corresponding] power above. 

[...] 

5. But who will tolerate thy nonsensical Sige, who names Him that cannot be named, and expounds the nature of Him that is unspeakable, and searches out Him that is unsearchable, and declares that He whom thou maintainest to be destitute of body and form, opened His mouth and sent forth the Word, as if He were included among organized beings; and that His Word, while like to His Author, and bearing the image of the invisible, nevertheless consisted of thirty elements and four syllables? It will follow, then, according to thy theory, that the Father of all, in accordance with the likeness of the Word, consists of thirty elements and four syllables! Or, again, who will tolerate thee in thy juggling with forms and numbers,-at one time thirty, at another twenty-four, and at another, again, only six,-whilst thou shuttest up [in these] the Word of God, the Founder, and Framer, and Maker of all things; and then, again, cutting Him up piecemeal into four syllables and thirty elements; and bringing down the Lord of all who founded the heavens to the number eight hundred and eighty-eight, so that He should be similar to the alphabet; and subdividing the Father, who cannot be contained, but contains all things, into a Tetrad, and an Ogdoad, and a Decad, and a Duodecad; and by such multiplications, setting forth the unspeakable and inconceivable nature of the Father, as thou thyself declarest it to be? And showing thyself a very Daedalus for evil invention, and the wicked architect of the supreme power, thou dost construct a nature and substance for Him whom thou callest incorporeal and immaterial, out of a multitude of letters, generated the one by the other. And that power whom thou affirmest to be indivisible, thou dost nevertheless divide into consonants, and vowels, and semi-vowels; and, falsely ascribing those letters which are mute to the Father of all things, and to His Ennœa (thought), thou hast driven on all that place confidence in thee to the highest point of blasphemy, and to the grossest impiety.

Against Heresies, Book I by St. Irenæus, Chapter XV.-Sige Relates to Marcus the Generation of the Twenty-Four Elements and of Jesus. Exposure of These Absurdities, #2 & #5 (bold is ours for emphasis).

&

Folly of the Arguments Derived by the Heretics from Numbers, Letters, and Syllables 

1. This very thing, too, still further demonstrates their opinion false, and their fictitious system untenable, that they endeavour to bring forward proofs of it, sometimes through means of numbers and the syllables of names, sometimes also through the letter of syllables, and yet again through those numbers which are, according to the practice followed by the Greeks, contained in [different] letters;-[this, I say, ] demonstrates in the clearest manner their overthrow or confusion, as well as the untenable and perverse character of their [professed] knowledge. For, transferring the name Jesus, which belongs to another language, to the numeration of the Greeks, they sometimes call it "Episemon," as having six letters, and at other times "the Plenitude of the Ogdoads," as containing the number eight hundred and eighty-eight. But His [corresponding] Greek name, which is "Soter," that is, Saviour, because it does not fit in with their system, either with respect to numerical value or as regards its letters, they pass over in silence. Yet surely, if they regard the names of the Lord, as, in accordance with the preconceived purpose of the Father, by means of their numerical value and letters, indicating number in the Pleroma, Soter, as being a Greek name, ought by means of its letters and the numbers [expressed by these], in virtue of its being Greek, to show forth the mystery of the Pleroma. But the case is not so, because it is a word of five letters, and its numerical value is one thousand four hundred and eight. But these things do not in any way correspond with their Pleroma; the account, therefore, which they give of transactions in the Pleroma cannot be true. 

2. Moreover, Jesus, which is a word belonging to the proper tongue of the Hebrews, contains, as the learned among them declare, two letters and a half, and signifies that Lord who contains heaven and earth; for Jesus in the ancient Hebrew language means "heaven," while again "earth" is expressed by the words sura usser. The word, therefore, which contains heaven and earth is just Jesus. Their explanation, then, of the Episemon is false, and their numerical calculation is also manifestly overthrown. For, in their own language, Soter is a Greek word of five letters; but, on the other hand, in the Hebrew tongue, Jesus contains only two letters and a half. The total which they reckon up, viz., eight hundred and eighty-eight, therefore falls to the ground. And throughout, the Hebrew letters do not correspond in number with the Greek, although these especially, as being the more ancient and unchanging, ought to uphold the reckoning connected with the names. For these ancient, original, and generally called sacred letters of the Hebrews are ten in number (but they are written by means of fifteen ), the last letter being joined to the first. And thus they write some of these letters according to their natural sequence, just as we do, but others in a reverse direction, from the right hand towards the left, thus tracing the letters backwards. The name Christ, too, ought to be capable of being reckoned up in harmony with the Aeons of their Pleroma, inasmuch as, according to their statements, He was produced for the establishment and rectification of their Pleroma. The Father, too, in the same way, ought, both by means of letters and numerical value, to contain the number of those Aeons who were produced by Him; Bythus, in like manner, and not less Monogenes; but pre-eminently the name which is above all others, by which God is called, and which in the Hebrew tongue is expressed by Baruch, [a word] which also contains two and a half letters. From this fact, therefore, that the more important names, both in the Hebrew and Greek languages, do not conform to their system, either as respects the number of letters or the reckoning brought out of them, the forced character of their calculations respecting the rest becomes clearly manifest.

Against Heresies, Book II by St. Irenæus, Chapter XXIV.-Folly of the Arguments Derived by the Heretics from Numbers, Letters, and Syllables, #1 & #2 (bold is ours for emphasis).

Related:

• There is poison in the mother but her milk is pure?

Feliks Koneczny on the anti-Christian roots of Hesychasm and Bogomilism

 The Byzantine Civilization (vol. 2) - Feliks Koneczny

(click images to enlarge)

source: The Byzantine Civilization (vol. 2) - Feliks Koneczny, pp. 336-9

The mind of Bergoglio

Jorge Mario Bergoglio Una biographia intellettuale (Jorge Mario 

Bergoglio An Intellectual Biography) by Massimo Borghesi

excerpts from

All Bergoglio's Teachers,

Even Though He Goes His Own Way

After the many narrative biographies of Pope Francis, here is the first one that rightly bears the title of “intellectual biography.” Its author, Massimo Borghesi, is professor of moral philosophy at the University of Perugia and has been very close to Jorge Mario Bergoglio since long before he was elected pope, on a par with that circle of friends whose best-known name is that of the vaticanista Andrea Tornielli, all of them belonging to the Roman branch of Communion and Liberation that was headed by the priest Giacomo Tantardini.

But in addition to coming from Borghesi’s pen, this book is also the offspring of the spoken word of Pope Francis himself, who on four occasions - the two most recent being on March 13, 2017, the fourth anniversary of his pontificate - sent to the author audio recordings that are repeatedly cited in the text and all aimed at identifying the sources of his formation.

It is a biography, therefore, that is in part an autobiography as well. And it is motivated precisely by a revelation made here for the first time by Bergoglio himself, according to whom at the origin of his thought is the French Jesuit theologian Gaston Fessard - a brilliant scholar of Hegel without being a Hegelian - with his 1956 book on the “dialectic” of the “Spiritual Exercises” of Saint Ignatius.

It is in fact above all from Fessard - as Borghesi confirms and substantiates - that Bergoglio got his markedly antinomian thinking, so fond of contradictions. But then came other prominent authors to reinforce this way of thinking, Erich Przywara and Henri de Lubac, both of them also Jesuits, Alberto Methol Ferré, an Uruguayan philosopher, and above all, but belatedly, Romano Guardini, with his youthful 1925 essay entitled “Der Gegensatz,” “Polar opposition,” on which Bergoglio wanted to base his doctoral thesis during the few months he spent studying in Germany in 1986, a thesis that was quickly dropped and never written.

Borghesi deftly illustrates the thinking of these great theologians and philosophers. To them he adds, among the inspirations to whom Bergoglio himself says he is a debtor, other first-rate stars like Michel de Certeau and Hans Urs von Balthasar. And he does all he can to demonstrate how in the writings of Bergoglio both far and near in time, before and after his election as pope, the genius of his teachers lives again.

[...]

The little known, Fr. Gaston Fessard was a friend of Teilhard de Chardin 

whom he corresponded with as well as Gabriel Marcel, Raymond Aron, 

Emmanuel Mounier, Claude Levy-Strauss among others.  Cardinal Henri 

de Lubac was an admirer.

It is true that Francis himself revealed three years ago, to the Argentine authors of another biography of his, that the chapter of “Evangelii Gaudium” with the four postulates is the transcription of a piece of his uncompleted doctoral thesis on Guardini.

But to see how this student exercise of his - an exercise now upgraded as pontifical magisterium - inevitably falls apart if its is subjected to the slightest elementary analysis, one gets the impression that the gap between Bergoglio and his celebrated teachers is truly very profound:

[...]

As for the nature of the Church as "complexio oppositorum,” meaning a combination of institution and event, of mystery/sacrament and word, of individuality and community, of interiority and public worship, the pontificate of Francis shows how he does not at all love this reciprocal enrichment between opposites, but on the contrary wants to suppress or disregard that which in one or the other opposition he sees as static or obsolete. His coldness toward the liturgy is plain for all to see, as is his insensitivity to the category of the beautiful and his underappreciation of doctrine and institution.

It must be said - and Borghesi recognizes this - that Bergoglio has never studied and assimilated the entire work of his teachers, but has only read a few isolated things, taking pointers from them in his own way.

And this explains the nonhomogeneity of his writings, magisterial as well, in which he combines the most diverse materials.

But it explains even more the gaping discrepancy between his illustrious teachers and the concrete figures of whom Pope Francis avails himself as his confidants and ghostwriters: from the Jesuit Antonio Spadaro, a rhetorical yarnspinner, to the Argentine Víctor Manuel Fernández, a theologian with a less than mediocre reputation, who revealed himself to the world with a first work entitled “Sáname con tu boca. El arte de besar,” and yet was encouraged by his friend who had become pope to go so far as to transcribe into “Amoris Laetitia” whole sections of his confused articles from a dozen years before, on family morality.

Another sign of confusion is the equal “preference” that Francis reserves for the two French theologians dearest to him, de Lubac and de Certeau, showing that he is unaware that de Lubac broke with de Certeau, his former pupil, and leveled harsh criticism against him: he accused him of being a “Joachimite” infatuated, like the visionary medieval friar, with a presumed golden age of pure spirit, free from any constraint of the ecclesiastical institution.

Moreover, in the “intellectual biography” of Bergoglio written by Borghesi, there are glaring omissions. There is total silence on Walter Kasper, in spite of the fact that Francis declared himself to be a reader and admirer of his from his first “Angelus” after being elected pope, and then rewarded him with boundless praise - for knowing how to do “theology on one’s knees” - and also promoted him as theologian-guide of the turning points on the matters of marriage and divorce and the primacy of the local Churches over the universal Church.

Nor is there so much as a word on Rodolfo Kusch, the Argentine anthropologist whose concept of people Francis recently said he had assimilated. And this in spite of the fact that in Borghesi’s book there are many pages on Bergoglio’s “populism.”

source: L’Espresso: Settimo Cielo di Sandro Magister, All Bergoglio's Teachers, Even Though He Goes His Own Way

We at Call Me Jorge... would add that this book also leaves out the influence of Chasidic philosophy from which Francis draws heavily.  This shows up most strongly in his regular inversions of the Gospels due to his reading them through Talmudic lenses and when he chastises the common Catholic pewsitter with a verbal barrage (Neopelagian!, Pharisee!, spiritual mummy!, petitioner for certainty in all things! creed reciting parrot Christian!, etc...) for dare resisting his revolutionary changes.  If one is ever confused at what Francis has said, from that he wants “shepherds living with the smell of the sheep” to “But Lord, throw a banana peel in front of them, so that they will take a good fall [into sin]” the place to begin is with the extreme depravity of Hasidism.



More on Francis and Hasidism:

• Francis invokes Pius XII in the name of modernism

• Where Francis' doctrine originates

• Francis' Hasidic concept of the god of surprises

• Reading Francis through Heschel

• Did Rabbi Heschel Influence Pope Francis?

• the hermeneutics of talmudic alchemical continuity — John Paul II, Levinas, and Francis

• Catholics don’t understand their faith so the Talmudic Jews explain it to them

• the latest anti-Catholic bilge spewing from Francis’ mouth in French interview

• Francis is onboard with the noahide program of The Elijah Interfaith Institute

• Francis tweets about the Talmudic concept of the “Other”

• Francis is onboard with the noahide program of The Elijah Interfaith Institute

• Hillary Clinton is a fan of Francis especially when he parrots ideas from Heschel & Lévinas

charismatics & the new evangelization

the gnostic roots of charismatic babbling

source: Theurgic Tendancies in Gnosticism and Iamblichus’s Conception of Theurgy by Birger A. Pearson, in Neoplatonism and Gnosticism edited by Richard T. Wallis & Jay Bregman(1992), pp. 257-9.

Thanks to Catholic Kulchur for pointing out this text in the post, Gnostic and Charismatic Babbling Revisited.

Francis’ media machine

Meet some members of the machine who help Francis push his Talmudic-gnostic message of humanism on the social medias

the Money Powers, Eastern Orthodoxy, alt-right, Gnosticism, etc..

The former RCGentlemanScholar blog which now goes by the moniker of Catholic Kulchur has an inaugural podcast in which he explains that his blog and future podcasts will deconstruct the Money Powers, Eastern Orthodoxy, the alt-right, Gnosticism, and much more.  We featured two of his posts on this blog A Genealogy of Love Power... that demonstrates how ‘Love Power’ spread from the Renaissance Neoplatonist Fr. Marsilio Ficino to our modern age and another ‘Spirit Cooking’ in the Renaissance which delves into the similarity of Marina Abramović’s spirit cooking and Fr. Marsilio Ficino’s recipes for maintaining youth.  Of late, has been writing about Gnosticism and Satanism in Eastern Orthodoxy.

• FIRST PODCAST FOR CATHOLIC KULCHUR

Since writing the above, Catholic Kulchur has come out with an excellent second podcast on the Eastern Orthodox writer Rod Dreher and his error filled book The Benedict Option.

• ON ROD DREHER’S THE BENEDICT OPTION

Francis writes preface to book by Cardinal Peter Turkson

The mask if off and all should be able to see Francis for the humanist gnostic that he is.

Corrosione Combattere La Corruzione Nella Chiesa E Nella Societa

by Cardinal Peter Turkson

(Corrosion: Fighting Corruption In The Church And In Society)

(Due to time considerations, Call Me Jorge... used an online translator for the text below and cleaned it up slightly.  We did read it in its original Italian and the translation reflects the Italian.)

Preface by Francis

Corruption, in its etymological root, defines a laceration, a break, a decomposition and disintegration. Whether as inner state or as a social fact, its action can be understood by looking at the relationships that man in his deepest nature. The human being has, a relationship with God, a relationship with his neighbor, a relationship with creation, that is the environment in which he lives. This triple relationship - which is also part of the man himself - gives context and meaning to his acts and, in general, to his life.

Corruption

When man meets the needs of these relationships it is honest, he assumes responsibilities with uprightness of heart and works for the common good. But when he suffers a fall, that is imperishable, these relationships are torn. Thus, corruption expresses the general shape of the disordered life of fallen man. At the same time, even as a result of the fall, corruption reveals an anti-social conduct strong enough to melt the validity of the relationships and then, later, the pillars which underpin a society: the coexistence of people and the vocations which develop it. Corruption breaks all this by replacing the common good with a particular interest that contaminates every general perspective. It arises from a corrupt heart, and is the worst social problem, because it creates very serious problems and crimes involving everyone. The word “corrupt” recalls broken hearts, a broken heart, stained by something, like a ruined body that naturally enters a process of decay and stench.

At the origin of injustice

What's the origin of man's exploitation? What, at the origin of the degradation and the lack of development? What, is at the origin of trafficking in persons, arms, drugs? What, is at the origin of social injustice and the humiliation of merit? What, is at the origin of the absence of services for people? What, is at the root of slavery, unemployment, neglect of the city of common goods and nature? What, in short, wears the fundamental right of the human being and the integrity of the environment? Corruption, which is in fact the weapon, it is also the most common language of the mafias and criminal organizations in the world. For this, it is a process of death that gives life to the culture of death of the mafias and criminal organizations. There is a deep cultural issue that should be addressed. Today most people can not even imagine the future; Today it is difficult for a young man to truly believe in its future, any future, and so for his family. This our change of era, a very wide crisis, it portrays the deepest crisis involving our culture. In this context it should be seen and understood as corruption in its various aspects. It is the presence of hope in the world, without which life loses that sense of inquiry and possibilities for improvement that makes it so.

The man should be seen in every aspect

In this book, Cardinal Peter Turkson, now prefect of the Congregation for the Service of Human Integral Development, and former president of the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace, explains well the ramification of these meanings of corruption, and does so with a particular focus on the inner origin of this, which in fact, germinates in the human heart and can take root in the hearts of all men. We are, in fact, all very exposed to the temptation of corruption and even when we think we have it defeated, it may reoccur. Man should be seen in all his aspects, he can not be divorced according from his activity, and so corruption is to be read - as we read in this book - all at once, for the whole man, both in his expressions of crime in the political, economic, cultural, and spiritual. In 2016 he ended the extraordinary ‘Jubilee of Mercy’. The mercy allows one too overcome themsleves in the spirit of searching. What if one arises in oneself and if one’s mind and heart do not explore a wider horizon?  There is the corrupt, and corrupting assumes the triumphalist attitude of those who feel smarter and more cunning than others. The corrupt person, however, does not realize that he are building, by himself, his own chains. A sinner can ask for forgiveness, a corrupter forgets to ask.  Because? Because he no longer needs to go further, to look for paths beyond himself: he is tired but full of himself. Corruption has, in fact, caused a fatigue of transcendence, as indifference.

The identity and the path of the Church

Cardinal Turkson - as we understand from this dialogue that is evolving according to a precise itinerary - explores the various steps in which corruption [exisits], humanity's spirituality and social, cultural, political and even criminal; putting these aspects together on what is most touched upon: the identity and path of the Church. The Church must listen, raise and bend over the sorrows and hopes of people according to mercy, and must do so without fear of purifying itself, assiduously seeking ways to improve itself. Henri de Lubac wrote that the greatest danger for the Church is that of spiritual worldliness - thus corruption - which is more disastrous than the infamous leprosy. Our corruption is the spiritual elegance, the lukewarmness, the hypocrisy, the triumphalism, the only spirit to prevail in the world on our lives, the sense of indifference. It is with this awareness that we, men and women of the Church, we can take ourselves and suffering humanity, especially one that is oppressed by the criminal consequences and degradation generated by corruption.

Christians, like snowflakes

As I write this, I am here in the Vatican, in a place of absolute beauty, in which human ingenuity has sought to elevate and transcend in an attempt to win the immortal over the fallen, the corrupt. This beauty is not a cosmetic accessory, but it something that puts the human person in the center so that it can uplift all the injustices. This beauty has to marry with justice. Thus, we must talk about corruption, denounce its evils, understand it, show the will to assert mercy towards meanness, curiosity and creativity towards the resigned weariness, the beauty towards nothing. We, Christians and non-Christians, are snow flakes, but if we united we can become an avalanche: a strong and constructive movement. Here is the new humanism, this renaissance, this re-creation against corruption that we can accomplish with prophetic audacity. We must all work together, Christians, non-Christians, people of all faiths and non-believers, to fight this form of blasphemy, this cancer that is wasting our lives. It is urgent to take notice of it, and this is why we need merciful education and culture, it requires cooperation on the part of everyone according to their own possibilities, their talents, their creativity.

Francis needs to look in a mirror and start with the blasphemies which come from his mouth, such as the Holy Trinity is always arguing but putting on a show of unity, which strike directly at the root of the Catholic Faith.

Only two days on the job and Francis says, ‘Holy Ghost is almost an Apostle of Babel’

The first and only time Francis used the papal throne.

Francis has been making headlines on only a select number of Catholic blogs with his recent blasphemies and heresies against the Holy Trinity, St. Peter, and Jesus the Christ.  Why are the rest of the Catholic media ignoring Francis’ words, pretending as if he never said them?  This has been going on for quite some time.  It turns out that Francis in only his second day on the job spouted off more blasphemous trash — the Holy Ghost is responsible for the differences between the churches (and by this Francis means Protestants, Orthodox, Catholic, etc...) and one would not be mistaken if they thought that the Holy Ghost was an Apostle of Babel.  Thanks to nazareusrex for bringing this to our attention.

The Pontifical University of Chile’s magazine, Humanitas, published these words,

Humanitas, No. 70 Ano XVIII, HOMENAJE AL NUEVO PONTÍFICE, PAPA FRANCISCO,Y AL PONTÍFICE EMÉRITO BENEDICTO XVI QUE CONDUJOLA BARCA DE PEDRO EN LOS PASADOS OCHO AÑOS, page 237

Thanks to the anonymous reader who pointed out that “si fuera un apóstol de Babel” translates into English as “like an apostle of Babel”.

In the original Italian statement, on the Vatican’s official website, which Francis is reading from it says, “e sembra che sia un apostolo di Babele” which translates into English as, “and it seems that he is an apostle of Babel”.


The Vatican’s official website, (underlines are ours for emphasis), English translation,

Dear brother Cardinals, this meeting of ours is intended to be, as it were, a prolongation of the intense ecclesial communion we have experienced during this period. Inspired by a profound sense of responsibility and supported by a great love for Christ and for the Church, we have prayed together, fraternally sharing our feelings, our experiences and reflections. In this atmosphere of great warmth we have come to know one another better in a climate of mutual openness; and this is good, because we are brothers. Someone said to me: the Cardinals are the priests of the Holy Father. That community, that friendship, that closeness will do us all good. And our acquaintance and mutual openness have helped us to be docile to the action of the Holy Spirit. He, the Paraclete, is the ultimate source of every initiative and manifestation of faith. It is a curious thing: it makes me think of this. The Paraclete creates all the differences among the Churches, almost as if he were an Apostle of Babel. But on the other hand, it is he who creates unity from these differences, not in “equality”, but in harmony. I remember the Father of the Church who described him thus: “Ipse harmonia est”. The Paraclete, who gives different charisms to each of us, unites us in this community of the Church, that worships the Father, the Son, and Him, the Holy Spirit.

source: Vatican, Audience with the College of Cardinals, Address of Francis, Clementine Hall Friday, 15 March 2013

So exactly how is the Holy Ghost almost an ‘apostle of confusion’?  The Holy Ghost is the Spirit of Wisdom.  It is the third person of the Blessed Trinity, proceeding from the Father and the Son and co-equal with Them — to equate confusion with the Holy Ghost is not only blasphemy but it is also heresy!  And to say that the Holy Ghost creates all the difference among churches — everyone should know by now that Francis includes all sorts and manner of heretics as members of the Novus Ordo church — wow, does this man have no shame? 

As we wrote some time ago about this day, Jorge trips over the papal throne or a modernist trips over tradition?,

The only use we can find of Jorge using the Papal Throne took place in Sala Clementina at the Vatican City when he was introduced to the College of Cardinals on 15 March 2013.  Upon getting off the throne Jorge stumbled but caught himself.  The throne was gone the next day and replaced by a papal chair.  God often speaks in signs is this one of them?  Does it foreshadow what this papacy will bring, namely traditions which are inconvenient will be replaced with something new, novel, and easy but not necessarily Catholic?

Since then looking at Francis’ behavior and words we at Call Me Jorge... can conclude that Francis is replacing the Catholic Faith with a mixture of Hasidism and Gnosticism and transforming the Novus Ordo into a loyal Noahide servent of Talmudic Judaism.  For as we have written before, “By the time Francis gets finished with his reign in the Vatican, the Novus Ordo church will resemble a synagogue and the Vatican a shtetl.”

Francis meets with the College of Cardinals — 15 March 2013

(begins at 6 min 20 sec — says at 6 min 58 sec — ends at 7 min 12 sec)

Francis’ gnostic ‘gospel’

“the memory of him [Jesus] who has made himself sin, who has made himself the devil, the serpent, for us; he has humbled himself to the point of complete annihilation.”

— Francis’ homily, 4 April 2017 —

(English translation - NovusOrdoWire, Bergoglio blasphemes again: Jesus Christ “made Himself the Devil”!)

“come memoria di colui che si è fatto peccato, che si è fatto diavolo, serpente, per noi; si è abbassato fino ad annientarsi totalmente” 

— Francis’ homily, 4 April 2017 —

(Original Italian - News.va, Nel segno della croce (4 aprile 2017))

Antonio Socci’s front page article on this blasphemy in Libero newspaper 6 April 2017.

For further commentary on Francis’ latest blasphemy see:

• NovusOrdoWire, Bergoglio blasphemes again: Jesus Christ “made Himself the Devil”!

• Lo Straniero - il blog di Antonio Socci, Bergoglio arriva ad affermare chiesa Gesu si diavolo tutti fanno finta nulla la sua strategia