Francis receives a copy of ‘The Jewish Annotated New Testament’

Amy-Jill Levine, Professor of New Testament and Jewish Studies at Vanderbilt University, and Marc Zvi Brettler, Professor in Judaic Studies at Duke University, the editors of the Jewish Annotated New Testament, presented the book to Pope Francis at the General Audience on Wednesday, March 27th. The following day, the work was discussed at a conference held at the Aula Magna of the Gregorian University, with responses by Professor Pino Di Luccio, S.J. and Biju Sebastian, S.J. The event was organized by Professor Jean-Pierre Sonnet, S.J., and Professor Luca Mazzinghi and co-sponsored by the Gregorian’s Faculty of Theology and the Cardinal Bea Centre for Judaic Studies.

The Jewish Annotated New Testament involves contributions of seventy Jewish scholars. It is the first major attempt of Jewish scholars to make the New Testament accessible to a Jewish readership, especially as an important source for the history of Judaism in the first century. At the same time, this work opens a Jewish perspective on the New Testament to Christian readers. It helps Christians to become aware of passages that are problematic for Jews. It also helps one to appreciate the implications of the Jewish identity of Jesus and the first believers in Christ. This work opens the door to respectful and enriching dialogue and is thus a major contribution to Jewish-Christian relations.

Amy-Jill Levine is currently Visiting Professor at the Pontifical Biblical Institute(PBI), where she teaches a course on the Parables of Jesus. She is the first Jewish scholar to teach in the field of New Testament at the Institute. She will also deliver a paper at the conference Jesus and the Pharisees, 7-9 May 2019, organised by Professor Joseph Sievers (PBI). Marc Brettler presented a lecture on “Religious and Critical Perspectives in Jewish Biblical Studies” at the PBI, hosted by Professor Agustinus Gianto, S.J., of the Institute’s Oriental Faculty.

01 APR CELEBRATING THE JEWISH ANNOTATED NEW TESTAMENT AT THE GREGORIAN UNIVERSITY, Gregorian Foundation, 1 April 2019.

The Jewish Annotated New Testament was written by eighty Talmudic Jews (anti-Christians such as Susannah Heschel, Jacob Neusner, Geza Vermes). In it they cite the Talmud, the Kabbalah, the Mishnah, the Zohar, the Pirkei Avot, the Dead Sea Scrolls, and an assortment of other Judaic literature to explain that Jesus was nothing more than a simple Jew and that the anti-semitism of Christianity comes from the non-Jewish followers of Jesus because they twisted his words. It’s enough to make one want to barf.  As an example of the ‘scholarship’ in the book we quote from the preface (pp. xiii-xiv) of the book written by its editors, Amy-Jill Levine and Marc Zvi Brettler,

See there it is and not very subtly. Christians are too dumb to understand the New Testament and need the Talmudic Jews to explain it to them.  The “good news” of the gospels isn’t “good news” if it says something against the Jews!  Could you ever imagine the shoe being on the other foot and the ‘holy’ texts of Talmudic Judaism such as the Talmud and the Zohar being annotated by the Christians so it is pointed out that Talmudic Judaism is not only anti-Christian but also anti-goyim?  Don’t hold your breathe because it’ll never happen.  That being said, this book is right up Francis’ hasidic alley.  In two 2018 speeches to the Participants in the International Conference on the Responsibility of States, Institutions and Individuals in the fight against anti-Semitism and anti-Semitic hate crimes, to the European Jewish Congress’ conference “An End to Antisemitism!” , and in his preface to An End to Antisemitism! A Catalogue of Policies to Combat Antisemitism, Francis said as much, “Translations of the New Testament... need marginal glosses, and introductions that emphasize continuity with Jewish heritage of... Christianity... and warn readers about antisemitic passages.”  He doesn’t end there however, “As I have often repeated, a Christian cannot be an anti-Semite; we share the same roots. It would be a contradiction of faith and life. Rather, we are called to commit ourselves to ensure anti-Semitism is banned from the human community.”

Francis’ Novus Ordo religion doesn’t begin with the Gospel of John, “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God,” but begins with the Go-spiel of Elie, “In the beginning was the Holocaust...” Since the holocaust is his standard reference, he must combat anti-semitism (it matter not if it be imagined or real) at all times.   The motto of his noahide Holocaustianity is an inversion of the Jesus’ teachings and His Church’s.  It can be summed up as, ‘forgiveness is never attainable, reparations are never ending, and salvation is only for the chosen ones’.

L’Osservatore Romano recommends Daf Yomi (Daily Talmud Lessons)

source: L’Osservatore Romano, Anno CLIII n. 96 (46.340), venerdì 26 aprile 2013, Il Talmud giorno per giorno, pagina 6.

One that slipped through the cracks and we at Call Me Jorge... just came across is that the L’Osservatore Romano published an article on 26 aprile 2013, Il Talmud giorno per giorno.  Here we have one of the instruments of the Vatican press extolling that the anti-Christian Talmud is available online and further praising the same website for offering daily lessons (which take seven years in total) which supposedly demonstrate that the Talmud is ‘biblical’ when it is if fact the opposite as the Talmud seeks to nullify the word of God whenever possible and substitute it with the man-made delusions of the Talmudic/Kabbalist rabbis.  The Talmud accomplishes this by commenting on much from the Tanakh pretending as if it is the word of God instead of the contrivances of 10th century and Renaissance rabbis. That this article was published a little less than one month and a half after Jorge Bergoglio was elected to the office of the papacy is no mere coincidence.



Related:

• New printing of Babylonian Talmud - Tractate Berakhot extolled in L’Osservatore Romano

Will those that complete all the Daf Yomi celebrate 

Siyum HaShas at Stadio Olimpico in Rome?

Why does Francis insists so strongly that Islam is peaceful?

“If the world hate you, know ye that it hath hated me before you. If you had been of the world, the world would love its own; but because you are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you.”

— John 15, 18-19 —

After meeting with Talmudic rabbis, Francis most popular guests are imams and Islamicists.  Every time he meets with one of the Moslems he says something along the lines of how peaceful the Moslem ‘religion’ is.  Francis had a private audience with Dr. Yousef bin Ahmed Al-Othaimeen this past Friday.  The statement which has come out is no exception.

The Secretary General of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation Dr. Yousef bin Ahmed Al Othaimeen met with His Holiness Pope Francis at the Vatican today, Friday, 16 March 2018. 

During the meeting both sides emphasized the importance of interfaith dialogue and raising the voice of wisdom and tolerance to combat extremism and terrorism. The Secretary General emphasized to His Holiness that terrorism has no religion, and that OIC condemns all terrorist acts coming from any religion. 

Al Othaimeen presented his thanks to the Pope for his stand on the issue of Al Quds [Jerusalem] and the basic rights of the Muslims and Christians in the holy city. Both sides were in agreement on the cause of Palestine and Al Quds [Jerusalem]. 

Al Othaimeen also appreciated the position of the Pope on many issues such as promoting human rights and migration, expressing his thanks to Pope Francis for his position on the Rohingya Muslims and their rights. The Pope from his side expressed his support to the basic rights of the Rohingya, adding that their suffering has been going on for a long time, and he thanked neighboring countries, specially Bangladesh for hosting them. 

The Pope also appreciated OIC’s position against terrorism, and stressed that there is no link between Islam and terrorism. 

The Secretary General also met with His Eminence the Secretary of State of the Vatican Pietro Parolin. They discussed cooperation and importance of dialogue between both sides and continuous contact. 

‘OIC Secretary General Discusses with Pope Francis Terrorism, Rohingya and Quds Issues’, Organisation of Islamic Cooperation, (16 March 2018)

Here we have a representative of the Moslems thanking Francis for his stand on Jerusalem.  Francis said of Jerusalem, “I wish to make a heartfelt appeal to ensure that everyone is committed to respecting the status quo...”  The status quo is the de-Christianization of Jerusalem and Israel.  Why would Francis also stress,“that there is no link between Islam and terrorism”?  The answer is a fairly simple one, Francis serves the machinations of the rabbis — therefore Islam is acceptable since it’s the fulfillment of the Noahide Laws — Christianity is considered Avodah Zarah (idol worship) and worthy of death.   Hence, Moslems are given a free pass and Catholics who profess the Faith are condemned.  Francis’ rabbinical buddies do not want non-Jews to covert to Talmudic Judaism instead the Talmudists want the non-Jews to convert to one of the acceptable forms of servile Noahidism.  So now you know why Franis insists that Islam is peaceful.

“blessed are your eyes, because they see, and your ears, because they hear.”

— Matthew 13, 16 —

the kippah or the yarmulke — an outward sign of rejection of Our Savior, Jesus the Christ

Why is this Nativity scene blasphemous?

This is a long overdue post on the kippah or yarmulke, a skullcap worn by Talmudic Jews.  In the Nativity photo above, St. Joseph is portrayed as an Orthodox Jew.  Interestingly, this photo was included on a blog post at Les Femmes — The Truth, Photo of Vatican Crib Scene Rejected by Facebook!, which complained (rightfully so) about the Vatican’s frightful and macabre Nativity in St. Peter’s Square this year and then says, (bold is ours for emphasis)

“Rather than end on a negative note, I will once again mention my grandchildren's play, The Promise. Isaiah tells us that at the height of man's wickedness, God sent a Savior. And he was beautiful and the scene surrounding his birth was filled with glory and singing and joy. So ignore the ugly and horrifying Nativity presented by the usurpers in Vatican City and put the image below [CMJ note: It’s the photo above in our post] in your mind this Christmas Season.” 

We will explain why this image isn’t wholesome but is in fact blasphemous and heretical.

Firstly, the kippah is an entirely different animal than the Catholic zucchetto (also referred to as a pileolus, berettino, calotte, subbiretum, submitrale, or solideo).  In the Catholic Encyclopedia (1913) under the entry ZUCCHETTO one reads,

It cannot be said positively when the zucchetto became customary, but it was probably not before the thirteenth century. It appears on the cardinals in the fresco, "St. Francis before Honorius III", painted about 1290 in the upper church of St. Francis at Assisi. It is seen also under the tiara in the effigy on the tomb of Clement VI (d. 1352) at La Chaise-Dieu. The figures on the several tombs of bishops of the fifteenth century in the Roman churches show the zucchetto under the mitre. In the "Ordo" of Jacobus Gajetanus (about 1311) the zucchetto is mentioned in connection with the hat of the cardinals (cap. cxviii), and with the mitre in the "Ordo" of Petrus Amelii (cap. cxliv.), which appeared about 1400. It is shown in the pictures and sculpture of the late Middle Ages sometimes as a round skullcap, sometimes as a cap that covers the back of the head and the ears. In this shape it was called camauro; this designation was given especially to the red velvet cap of this kind bordered with ermine that was peculiar to the pope. There was great confusion as to the proper use of the zucchetto and hence the Sacred Congregation of Rites has delivered several decisions on the Subject ("Decr. auth. Congr. SS. Rit.", V, Rome 1901, 382).

A sketch of Pope Pius XII wearing a white zucchetto.

We now move onto the kippah, its origin, and reasons for wearing it.  Modern day Jews often lament that in times past the followers of the Talmud were often made to wear some type of identification (a badge, coat, or cap) in Christian countries which identified them as a Jew.  They promote this as a form of religious persecution and believe that this eternal victim status gives them carte blanche to commit offenses in the modern world.  What if we were to tell you that one of the reasons for the wearing of the kippah served the same purpose, identification (albeit with a huge loophole).  Along these lines a kippah identifies the wearer of it as one who follows the Talmud and the dictates of the rabbis including denying Jesus as the Christ.  Not only is it used for identification but also as an act of defiance towards assimilation into the Christian country.  Don’t believe us, then read what the rabbis and scholars have to say...

• Don’t imitate Christians who pray bareheaded and are lightminded heathens •

“The opinion of David Halevy of Ostrog (17th century) is an exception. He declared that since Christians generally pray bareheaded, the Jewish prohibition to do so was based on the biblical injunction not to imitate the heathen custom (*ḥukkat hagoi; Magen David to OḤ 8:2). Traditional Jewry came to equate bareheadedness with unseemly lightmindedness and frivolity (kallut rosh), and therefore forbids it (Maim. Yad, De'ot 5:6).”

source: Jewish Virtual Library, Jewish Practices & Rituals: Covering of the Head

• Goyim (Christians) pray with uncovered heads and prayers don’t count if the head is uncovered •

“The Taz says even though mi’ikkur hadin, it’s not a chiyuv to wear a kippa, this is “bechokoseyhem lo teilecho” since the goyim take off their headcovering, we should not do the same. To be bareheaded is an issue of “bechukoseyhem lo teilecho”.

[...]

But Rav Moshe does admit that there is one case that the Taz does apply, and that is by davening. This is because when Christians are in Church they have to take off their headcovering. So if one davens without a headcovering, one did not fulfill his chiyuv. If your tallis falls in the middle of shemonei esreh, maybe you don’t have to go get it, but if your kippa falls off you have to.”

source: Pure Torah, Head Covering For Men

• Wearing a kippah isn’t Biblical, it’s Talmudic & a sign to identify one as a Jew •

source:  Being Jewish: The Spiritual and Cultural Practice of Judaism Today by Ari L. Goldman, page 218

• The rabbis created the law that Jews were to wear kippot so not as to be confused with the cursed (Christian) nations among whom they lived •

source:  A Cultural History of Jewish Dress by Eric Silverman, page 162

• The Catholic faith is false worship and not to be imitated in any manner •

“Maimonides decreed: "The Yid should be distinguished from the Christians and distinct in his dress and his actions, just as he is different from them in his knowledge and understanding." The basic halacha is that any of the practices that Christians use in their false worship (avodah zara) is forbidden to be done by Judaics (Yiddin) even if Judaics used these practices prior to Christianity. In other words, even if the Bible—or the Talmud— sanctions a certain practice, Judaics are forbidden by the rabbis from continuing to do so if this practice was subsequently adopted by Christians.”

source: Judaism Discovered, From Its Own Texts: A Study of the Anti-Biblical Religion of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition and Deceit, p. 591.

• Praying with an uncovered head is an impious act and identifies one as a Christian •

“With the passage of time, the custom of covering the head during worship increasingly became mandatory. As the persecutions by the Church increased, the Jewish aversion to everything Christian deepened. The uncovering of the head became associated with Church etiquette and therefore became repugnant. To worship or even to go about with an uncovered head was regarded as imitation of the Christians and an act of irreverence to God. Conversely, the covering of one’s head became an act of Jewish piety. For convenience the skullcap, or yarmulke, was adopted.”

source: My Jewish Learning, Kippot (Head Coverings) in Synagogue

Jews wearing kippot as not to be identified as with the cursed nations (Catholics).

• Don’t be bareheaded like a gentile •

“Taz famously wrote that nowadays since gentiles specifically walk with their heads uncovered, a Jew who walks around with his head uncovered is in violation of the Torah prohibition against following the ways of the gentiles.”

source: Daf Yomi Digest, Friday 31 May 2013, Halachah Highlight, p. 2.

• Don’t be like a gentile •

“As Prof. Zimmer speculates, the symbolic differentiation created by kippot helped distinguish the Jews from their gentile neighbors. A couple of 15th-century German sources, for example, indicate that leaving one's head uncovered inappropriately imitates gentile habits and leads to assimilation. Similarly, in the 17th century, Rabbi David Halevi Segal ostracized those Jews who, like their non-Jewish neighbors, remove their hats when sitting down (Taz OC 8:3).”

source: Failed Messiah, Why Rabbi Akiva, Rebbe, Rabbi Eliezer and Rabbi Yehoshua All Went Bareheaded

•  Jews cannot imitate Christians in any manner when it comes to practicing Talmudism •

“In a recent book on the halakhic force of customs, Imrei Barukh: Tokef Ha-Minhag Ba-Halakhah, Rav Baruch Simon addresses this question. One reason for various customs is the biblical prohibition against following the practices of other religions (chukos ha-goyim). Following the Jews’ emancipation, this prohibition became a dominant theme in the complex integration of Jews into Christian society–what are we allowed to do and what is off limits? 

Prior to that, Rav Shlomo Luria (Responsa Maharshal, no. 72) concluded that wearing a yarmulke is only a custom, not a law. The Vilna Gaon (Bi’ur Ha-Gra, Orach Chaim 8:6) ruled that you are not even obligated to wear a yarmulke while you pray. However, the Taz (Orach Chaim 8:3) added the consideration of chukos ha-goyim. Since Christians would regularly remove their head coverings, particularly before praying, Jews may not follow this practice. According to the Taz, sitting without a yarmulke–and certainly praying bareheaded–is biblically prohibited.

Rav Simon quotes Rav Moshe Feinstein (Iggeros Moshe, Orach Chaim 4:40:14) who distinguishes between sitting and praying bareheaded. Christians do the former merely out of convenience. However, they pray bareheaded as a religious conviction. Therefore, Rav Feinstein rules, praying without any head covering–even by accident–is forbidden and the prayer is invalid. If your yarmulke accidentally falls off during prayer, you have to pray again after you cover your head.”

source: Torah Musings, What To Do About A Yarmulke #Fail

• Jews mustn’t be like gentiles or assimilate with them •

source: The Rabbinical Assembly, “Non Jews and Kippah in the Synagogue”

• Praying with an uncovered head is like brandishing a weapon in the synagogue — an offense to God •

“The Torah Temimah, on this verse, cites the words of the Shulchan Aruch and he raises a question. The Shulchan Aruch writes that one should not enter a shul “with a long knife or with an uncovered head”. The simple reading of the Shulchan Aruch seems to suggest that there are two entirely different topics being discussed: firstly, one should not enter a shul with a weapon and secondly one should not enter without properly covering one’s head (yarmulka). The Torah Temimah wonders what connection there is between these two statements. What’s more the Shulchan Aruch already discussed the hallacha of praying without a head covering in siman 91, why then would he feel compelled to repeat himself?

He therefore offers an entirely different interpretation of the ruling of the Shulchan Aruch. The Shulchan Aruch is actually discussing one topic throughout and that is weapons in the synagogue. When the Shulchan Aruch writes that one should not enter with an “uncovered head” he is actually referring to the “head” of the weapon. The prohibition exists only if the weapon is uncovered. One is allowed to pray as long as the weapon is concealed. Although the Levush seems to not agree with this novel interpretation of the words of the Shulchan Aruch, the Elya Raba seems to concur with the Torah Temimah.”

source: halachablog, Praying While Carrying a Weapon

Jews are not required to wear a yarmulke if it will hurt them 

economically or if they are in a Noahide compliant country.

• The laws and the loopholes for follower of the Talmud concerning the kippah •

Halachos for Thursday, January 29 , 2015

1) Jewish males may not walk more than 4 Amos (around 8 feet) without a head covering. (Shulchan Aruch Siman 2:6 and Mishna Berura S"K 11 quoting the Taz. See also Shu"t Igros Moshe Orach Chim Vol. 1 Siman 1 regarding the size requirement of the head covering)

It is praiseworthy to be stringent and not even sit in one place, or even sleep without a head covering. (Mishna Berura ibid.)

Young boys should be trained from a very early age to wear a Kipah on their heads, as the Talmud (Shabbos 156b) teaches that covering the head leads one to fear Hashem.

B'sha'as hadchak, If one must walk 4 Amos in his home and doesn't have something with which  to cover his head, he may do so with his bare hand .However, if one is outside (and he is directly under the sky) using his hand for a cover will not suffice, rather the sleeve of his hirt or another item must be used.( See Mishna berura Siman 2 S"K 12)

2) If one is in a place where he cannot cover his head (like a court house, where it may be the law of the land that heads must be bare), or if he is in such a profession that he is afraid that covering his head will cause him loss of clients or revenue, there is a possibility that he can sit with a bare head without transgressing this Halacha. (See Shu"t Rivevos Ephraim Vol. 5 Siman 40 what he quotes from Rav Moshe Feinstein Zatzal)

However, before determining this, especially nowadays when it is acceptable almost everywhere to wear a Kipah (due to the kindness of Hashem that most of us live with religious freedom and tolerance), a competent Halachic authority must be consulted.

HALACHOS FOR EREV SHABBOS KODESH, JUNE 5,2015

DOUBLE PORTION L'KAVOD SHABBOS KODESH

HALACHOS FOR EREV SHABBOS KODESH

1) PLACING YOUR OWN HAND ON YOUR HEAD DOES NOT SUFFICE TO BE CONSIDERED A PROPER HEAD COVERING, AND DAVENING THIS WAY IS AKIN TO DAVENING WITH A BARE HEAD. SOMEONE ELSE'S HAND ON YOUR HEAD SUFFICES. (SHULCHAN ARUCH SIMAN 91:4)

2) EXTENDING THE SLEEVE OF YOUR SHIRT OR JACKET OVER YOUR PALM AND COVERING YOUR HEAD WITH THE CLOTH SUFFICES AS A HEAD COVERING. (SEE MISHNA BERURA SIMAN 91 S"K 10. SEE ALSO MISHNA  BERURA SIMAN 2 S"K 12 THAT FOR A BRACHA, B'SHA'AS HADCHAK, THERE MAY BE ROOM FOR LENIENCY, BUT HE CONCLUDES THAT IT IS BETTER NOT TO RELY ON THIS LENIENCY.)

HALACHOS FOR SHABBOS KODESH

1) A MALE WHO DAVENS WITH A BARE HEAD, EVEN B'SHOGEG, UNINTENTIONALLY,  ACCORDING TO HARAV MOSHE FEINSTEIN ZATZAL (IGROS MOSHE ORACH CHAIM VOL. 4 SIMAN 40:14) MUST DAVEN AGAIN, AS HE HASN'T SATISFIED HIS OBLIGATION, EVEN B'DIEVED. HE WRITES THERE THAT THIS TEFILAH IS DEEMED "TOEVA", AN ABOMINATION.

HARAV SHLOMO ZALMEN AUERBACH ZATZAL (HALICHOS SHLOMO; TEFILAH, PEREK 2:16) RULES MORE LENIENTLY, AND MAINTAINS THAT IF IT WAS DONE UNINTENTIONALLY, B'DIEVED HE HAS SATISFIED HIS OBLIGATION AND  DOES NOT NEED TO DAVEN OVER.

2) IF ONE'S YARMULKA, TALIS OR OTHER HEAD COVERING  FALLS OFF IN THE MIDDLE OF DAVENING SHEMONA ESREI, HE SHOULD  STOP DAVENING TO RETRIEVE IT, EVEN IF HE HAS TO STEP OUT OF HIS PLACE TO DO SO, BEFORE RESUMING SHEMONA ESREI. (SEE HALICHOS SHLOMO; TEFILAH, PEREK 2, DVAR HALACHA 27)

source: Halacha For Today, Archives: Hilchos Tefilah

• A Talmudic Jew need not wear a kippah in a Moslem country (as they are Noahides), only when in a Christian country • 

The Rambam prohibits praying the shemoneh esrei bareheaded (Hilchos Tefillah 5:5), and he also states that it is appropriate for a talmid chacham to cover his head at all times (Hilchos Dei’os 5:6). 

Based on the above sources, most, but not all, halachic authorities contend that, in Talmudic times, covering one’s head was performed on special occasions, such as when praying, reciting blessings, and in the presence of a Torah scholar, but was not always otherwise observed (Tur, Orach Chayim 8, as explained by Darkei Moshe; Shu”t Maharshal #72; Gra on Orach Chayim 8:2).  These rulings imply that someone other than a talmid chacham is not required to cover his head, except when davening. As we will soon see, most authorities conclude that, today, one is required to cover one’s head, because of reasons that did not apply in the time of the Gemara.

Some authorities note that the Taz’s reason should apply only in western countries and other places where the gentiles have a specific practice to uncover their heads. However, in places where the gentiles have no such concerns, such as in Moslem countries, there is no prohibition of chukos akum in leaving one’s head uncovered (Shu”t Igros Moshe, Orach Chayim 1:1). It may still be prohibited because of Jewish custom.

source: RabbiKaganoff.com, Under the Big Top

Jesus never would have worn a kippah as Hebrew-catholics are wont to portray him.

• Portraying Jesus with a yarmulke (kippah) is an anachronism since they didn’t exist in his lifetime •

[...]

source: 60 Questions Christians Ask About Jewish Beliefs and Practices, pp. 81-83

We could go on and on with many more citations but we think the reader gets the point — kippot (yarmulkes) were not worn in the time of Jesus the Christ as they hadn’t been incorporated into Talmudic Judaism yet.  They are anti-Catholic in nature and not only are they an outward sign of Judaic supremacy, the wearer also proclaims he believes:

“The Talmudic stories make fun of Jesus' birth from a virgin, fervently contest his claim to be the Messiah and Son of God, and maintain that he was rightfully executed as a blasphemer and idolater. They subvert the Christian idea of Jesus' resurrection and insist he got the punishment he deserved in hell--and that a similar fate awaits his followers.”

The author Michael Hoffman sums it up best when he writes,

“The mystery of the ever-present male Judaic head-covering (kipa, yarmulke etc.) is solved by the knowledge that it is mandatory in a religious context because being bare-headed is mandatory for Christian males in church. Rabbi Feinstein rules that entering a synagogue or davening (praying) on the part of a Judaic male without his head covered is strictly forbidden since Christian men always remove their hats when entering a church. Feinstein discusses the need to recite a penitential purification formula (shemonah esrei) on the part of the Judiac male who imitates Christians by praying with an uncovered head. However, many rabbinic authorities (poskim) permit an uncovered male Judaic head in order to deceive the goyim in circumstances in which to wear a yarmulke would raise their ire: testimony in a court of gentile law, for example, or in circumstances where the wearing of a head-covering might cause a Judaic male to lose his job. Hence, Senator Joseph Lieberman of Connecticut, an Orthodox Judaic follower of the Talmud, when running for the office of Vice-President and later President of the United States, appeared in public in most cases without his yarmulke, so as not to risk losing the prospective "job" he was seeking. We can even trace the origins of the Yiddish language to hatred of Christians. The Judaic-German halachic decisor Rabbi Moshe Sofer (the "Chasam Sofer") ruled that, based on the eighteen decrees of prohibition of the Yerushalmi (Jerusalem Talmud), one of which forbids the adoption of the language of the Christians, it was later necessary for Judaics to make many alterations to the German language, which as a result led to the gradual rise of Yiddish.”

source: Judaism Discovered, From Its Own Texts: A Study of the Anti-Biblical Religion of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition and Deceit, pp. 591-2.

To which we would only add that Jews are not obligated to wear a kippah (yarmulke) when in a Moslem country.  The reason for this is because Moslems pray to the same god as the Jews and are Noahide compliant while Catholics are considered idol worshipers by the Talmudists.

Returning to the first photo of this post of the Nativity scene with St. Joseph wearing a kippah, we now hope that the reader understands how not only is this blasphemous, it is also heretical and an occult mockery of Our Lord’s birth.  It, like Francis’ Vatican Nativity, is dangerous because they are poisons disguised as medicines for the soul.

Talmudic diversity

“As for my people, their oppressors have stripped them, and women have ruled over them. O my people, they that call thee blessed, the same deceive thee, and destroy the way of thy steps.”

— Prophecy Of Isaias 3,12 —

Related:

• R.I.P. Antonin ‘Nino’ Gregory Scalia

• Talmudic praise for Justice Scalia

more insanity of Talmudic Judaism — Eruv the magic rabbinical wire!

Talmudists spread their man-made 

mental sickness to all!

source: Judaism Discovered by Michael Hoffman, page 944

Why do Jews need an eruv?

Eruvs are great!

Sharia law Halakhic law is here!

UH OH!!! Sound the ALARM the eruv is down!!!

How long until Francis enrolls the Novus Ordo in assisting the elder brothers in the building of these foolish walls?



More on the man-made ‘traditions’ of the Talmudists

• Francis & the Shekinah
• the Babylonian superstition,Tashlikh
• Francis & Yom Kippur
• Jesus in the Talmud
• The ignorance of the rabbis and their talmud students
• For those who still think Jews believe in the Old Testament and are God’s chosen people

A reflection for Whitsunday

• Maurice Pinay, For Pentecost

Rabbi Bergman & the Great Rabbi Bergoglio

Sergio Bergman has plenty of photos with his rabbi Francis but the one seen above must be his favorite. The original photo posted to instagram by Sergio can be found here.  Sergio is on the right with Diego Santilli, the Deputy Chief of Government of the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, on the left.


Related:

• Noche de los cristales rotos 2005

• Rabbi Bergman's Easter remarks

• Rabbi Francis

• Jorge Mario Bergoglio was a regular at the shul

• the Talmud, Freemasonry, & Environmentalism

• What is Hanukkah?

Francis to meet head of Russian Orthodox Church in communist Cuba

Francis & Kirill will meet in the communist paradise of Cuba thanks to the work of Raúl Castro.

Rabbi Kogan blesses the patriarch-pope meeting

Moscow, February 8, Interfax - The Congress of Jewish Religious Communities and Organizations in Russia attaches great importance to the upcoming meeting between Patriarch Kirill of Moscow and All Russia and Pope Frances.

"Personal meetings are very important. The Orthodox world is led by our patriarch, the Catholic one by the pope, and such a meeting is a guarantee that good cooperation will be of huge significance both for the Orthodox world, including Russia, and for Catholics. We bless this meeting," the Congress' Vice President, rabbi Zinovy Kogan, told Interfax-Religion.

As for the Judaist-Catholic dialogue, he said he met with a pontific - the late John Paul II. Talks with the incumbent Pope Frances were held in April 2015 by the president of the Conference of European Rabbis, the chief rabbi of Moscow, Pinchas Goldschmidt, Kogan said.

"The current pope encourages in every possible way the dialogue between Judaists and Catholics. Recently he even said that all Catholics are a little Judaist, given that underlying our religious traditions is the Old Testament, i.e. the Torah," rabbi Kogan said.

Rabbi Zinovy Kogan blesses this meeting!

Do not covet the Talmudists ownership of the Vatican's theology nor Francis' visit to their synagogue.

Happy Day of Judaism!

Source: Italian Catholic Church, Day for the exploration and development of dialogue between Catholics and Jews

Tomorrow is the day!

Riccardo Di Segni on Francis, “We are waiting for a surprise.”

“Francis’s visit to the synagogue will be far closer to a family reunion precisely because the blessed new positive Catholic-Jewish relationship has become almost normative, and Francis is overwhelmingly seen as a true friend of the Jewish people, which indeed he is,” said Rabbi David Rosen, the American Jewish Committee’s international director for interreligious affairs.

Rosen added, “Three in Jewish tradition is a hazakah — that is, a confirmation. And now,” after this third papal visit, “it will almost be impossible for a pontiff not to visit the Rome Great Synagogue as well as to visit the State of Israel.”

source: Forward, Pope Francis To Visit Rome’s Great Synagogue Sunday


Related:

• Day for the exploration and development of dialogue between Catholics and Jews

• Francis' rabbi, Abraham Skorka, weighs in on the the ‘humble’ bishop of Rome's upcoming trip to the Great Synagogue of Rome

a new resource on Talmudic Judaism

We at Call Me Jorge... were sent a link today on Talmudic Judaism. It is a new website named Judaism.is. We haven't had the time to check the entire contents of the website but what we have examined is a unique repository about the rabbis and their ‘holy’ books.  We have republished below the homepage as it gives a mission statement to the purpose of the site.  You can look at this website by clicking here.

Welcome to Judaism.is 

This site is dedicated to the Blessed Virgin of the Rosary of Pompeii.

This is an educational forum about Judaism and its effect on history, culture, and current events. The information has been carefully compiled, mostly from Judaic sources: the rabbis, their “holy” books, and Judaic, especially Israeli, media. As you can see for yourself, we offer some commentary, but much is in their own words. Many of the leads to primary sources are from the heavy lifting of those listed in the Further Educational Resources section. Our thanks and prayers go to them.

Internet hyperlinks are provided when available to allow readers to verify quotes and for research leads. The posting of a hyperlink or video does not imply  agreement with all linked content.  When webpages and videos draw attention, they are often taken down.

Since we are practicing Catholics, we work and pray for the conversion of all souls, so that allmay be saved. Only Truth leads to salvation.

Since we are practicing Catholics, we oppose all Master Race creeds and we oppose all crimes against humanity, including economic crimes against humanity.

Please quote the materials here far and wide. Use this material to expose and defeat Satan and his synagogue.

Judaism.is

the company Francis keeps

Rabbi Walter Homolka shakes Francis' hand. (28 October 2015)

“In September 2008, the Nobel Laureate Elie Wiesel startled his audience at a Holocaust Educational Trust appeal dinner in London when he declared: "I was there when God was put on trial at a concentration camp." When the JC put doubts of Rabbi Jonathan Romain and Rabbi Dan Cohn-Sherbock to Mr Wiesel, he replied: "Why should they know what happened? I was the only one there. It happened in Auschwitz at night; there were just three people. At the end of the trial, they used the word chayav, rather than 'guilty'. It means 'He owes us something'. Then we went to pray."”

source: Dresden lecture on Theodicy by Rabbi Walter Homolka

Dialogue?

“Catholics, don’t trust the Jew; he hates you and is just playing games. The whole Vatican II dialogue with the Jews is a pantomime to distract your attention and destroy Catholic militancy against Judaism.” 

- Atila Sinke Guimarães -

• FATAL FLAW IN THE CATHOLIC-JEWISH DIALOGUE by Atila Sinke Guimaraes

More on the Talmudic Jewess (Rivka Ravitz) Francis bowed to while covering his pectoral cross

Rivka Ravitz, whom was in the recent post Talmudic R-E-S-P-E-C-T, is a trail blazing Renaissance Haredi (ultra-orthodox) woman and the President of Israel's Chief of Staff according to the video embedded below.  Rivka is President longtime assistant and served as his executive assistant when he was a Knesset lawmaker.  Later she served of his Chief of Staff when Rivlin was the Speaker of the Knesset.  She is also the mother of 11 children.  Francis didn't chastise her for 'breeding like a rabbit' because she isn't Catholic and he has respect for all things Talmudic.

Why does Francis show respect for the Talmudic religion but not Catholicism?

Jesus in the Talmud

• The Thinking Housewife reviews, Jesus in the Talmud

• Jesus in the Talmud by Peter Schafer (pdf)

Chagall's blasphemous White Crucifixion is going to Italy

...where Francis will view it.

The inscription above the head in Chagall's blasphemous painting is Jesus' name misspelled in Hebrew which doubles as the rabbinic acronym "May his name and his memory be wiped out".

Marc Chagall's blasphemous painting, "The White Crucifixion", which depicts Jesus the Christ not as the messiah but instead as Jesus 'Hasidic' Christ is being loaned by the Art Institute of Chicago to the Palazzo Strozzi in Florence, Italy.   This piece of alchemical garbage will be part of an exhibition titled, Divine Beauty: From Van Gogh to Chagall and Fontana.  The exhibition will start 24 September 2015 and finish 24 January 2016.  Francis will finally get to view his favorite work of art in the flesh for the first time between the 9th & 13th of November when he will be in Florence attending the Fifth National Bishops Conference.  The Art Institute of Chicago replaced "The White Crucifixion" temporarily with an ugly painting called the "Red-Haired Girl" by Emil Nolde.  Even though it's ugly it is a tremendous improvement as it isn't an affront to God.  For readers not familiar with Chagall's Hasidic Golem Jesus, see the links below the photos which discuss it in detail.

 Off the wall it goes.

 It's going to see the modernist, Francis 'the Humble'.

Quite the improvement!

More on the White Crucifixion

• update on the White Crucifixion

• addendum to the White Crucifixion

Maurice Pinay's posts on the White Crucifixion

• Pope Francis' Favorite Painting

• Pope Francis' 'Modernist' Hasidism

• Why Does Pope Francis Promote the Hasidic Painting, "The White Crucifixion"?

• Counterfeit Israel's Counterfeit Jesus

• More on Hasidic Painter, Marc Chagall's Golem 'Jesus' Resurrected by Pope Francis

• Wrapping Up Bergoglio's Love and Promotion For Chagall's Hasidic 'Christ'