Want to know what Francis’ position on abortion is?

Then, just look at his scandalous actions.

Francis had an audience with the members of the Pontifical Academy Of Life on Monday, 25 June 2018, in the Clementine Hall where he gave an address.  Afterwards, Francis met with some of the members of the academy including the two pro-abortion rabbis (Rabbi Avraham Steinberg, M.D. & Rabbi Professor Fernando Szlajen) he appointed to it.  No where in his address did Francis condemn abortion, instead he uttered a bunch of hollow platitudes, talked about his program of gnostic environmentalism (global bioethics), and appealed to the ethics, values, and wisdom of those in attendance.  Let’s see, what are some of the ethics, values, and wisdom of rabbis Steinberg and Szlajen?  A few of the ethics of Rabbi Steinberg are: gentiles should be put to death for committing abortion but Jews shouldn’t be, pedophilia rape is OK, blood has magic abilities, the first man Adam was a hermaphrodite, etc... One of the value$ that Rabbi Szlajen teaches is, the Bible demands abortion in only one case “when the life of the conceptus [the embryo in utero] inexorably threatens that of its mother.”  He then goes on to justify this by citing, “the law of rodef, ‘pursuer’.”  We don’t know about you, but we have yet to read a Bible which sanctions abortion or cites ‘the law of the rodef’.  We have read the Talmud though, which says almost verbatim what Rabbi Szlajen wrote.  This noahidzation of the church is what Francis means when he says he wants a, “deepening of scientific, anthropological and ethical knowledge, and in service to life,” and “there is a real cultural revolution on the horizon of history at this time. The Church must, first and foremost, be part of it.”

 Rabbi Avraham Steinberg, M.D. with Francis.

Rabbi Professor Fernando Szlajen with Francis.

Put on your surprise face — rabbinic member of the Pontifical Academy Of Life says abortion is Biblical in certain cases!

We have covered for some time, Francis’ appointment of two Talmudic rabbis to the Vatican’s Pontifical Academy Of Life and how this is an inversion of the academy’s original purpose. Francis said in an address to academy members,

“There is a real cultural revolution on the horizon of history at this time. The Church must, first and foremost, be part of it. In this perspective, it is essential to honestly recognize her weaknesses and shortcomings.”

We previously commented on this statement,

“Francis’ “real cultural revolution” is one which inculcates pewsitters into Noahides compliant with Halakhic law, further processing them into followers of the demented rabbis. We encourage readers unfamiliar with this topic to read [update on the new member of the Pontifical Academy Of Life — Rabbi Avraham Steinberg, M.D.] It should set the reader straight as to what Francis meant when he said in his address that he wants a, “deepening of scientific, anthropological and ethical knowledge, and in service to life.” Francis, in reality, desires a future for the Novus Ordo filled with man-made superstitions, pedophilia, and rabbinic racial supremacy.”

Well, yesterday one of the rabbis that Francis appointed to the academy, Rabbi Fernando Szlajen, wrote an article published on infobae, Aborto a demanda: el crimen como derecho, in which he explains that abortion is fine as long as it is committed under a particular set of circumstances, it’s also even Biblical!  Like the rabbi that he is, Szlajen talks out of both sides of his mouth.  He spends a good portion of the article wailing about unnecessary abortions and the evils of abortion but then gets to the rabbinic loophole for abortion and pins this squarely on the Bible.

“In only one case does the Bible demand an abortion, when the life of the conceptus [the embryo in utero] inexorably threatens that of its mother, resolving that as long as it has not been born, the woman's life is prioritized because her life comes first.  In such a said case, typified under the law of rodef, ‘pursuer’, it prescribes to kill whoever with certainty and effectively threatens the life of another, even when he is not aware of it. In cases of anencephaly, irreversible degenerative or terminal pathologies where the conceptus will inevitably die, typified as tzarrej gadol, ‘great need’, for the loss, causing the siege and the oppression of the person, abortion is allowed with severe restrictions in time and form. Similar criteria apply to women, pregnant from rape, being that they are in serious psychophysical state.”

And there you have it dear reader, a slow step by step inculcation of rabbinic morals which will result one day into a full blown Noahide initiation.  The responsibility for this rests directly on Francis’ shoulders.  Recall our previous posts where we demonstrate that Francis lies with regularity and often plays dumb to those whom he lies.  We expect nothing less than this if Francis is ever confronted on the matter.  Now returning to what Rabbi Szlajen wrote, no abortion isn’t Biblical it’s Talmudic.  If the rabbi had been truthful he would have explained, as we have on this blog, that the Talmud says all abortions are fine until the head of the baby leaves the uterus during birth because, “Before the baby is born, it is not considered a living soul, and it is therefore not subject to the halakhot (law) of murder.” (Koren Talmud Bavli: Sanhedrin Part Two, Jerusalem, 2017, p. 155.)  Further the rabbi would have told his readers that non-Jews do not possess the souls of men but of animals, in other words they do not have souls. 

[...]

 source: Hakirah, The Soul of a Jew and the Soul of a Non-Jew, p. 51

source: Hakirah, The Soul of a Jew and the Soul of a Non-Jew, p. 56 

So the logical conclusion is that the two rabbis believe that abortion is acceptable for Jews as long as the head of the baby hasn’t left the uterus because that’s when the baby acquires its soul and for goyim or non-Jews abortion is okay any time because they don’t possess souls.  Any discussion contrary to this is just the rhetorical trick of pilpul which makes true rational discussion impossible — it’s a sideshow to make a dog chase its tail.  Dear reader, please educate yourself and others about these matters, make personal acts of reparation, and pray more fervently in order that those stuck in the rabbinic insane asylum may escape and learn that their Savior is Jesus the Christ.  Else those in the Novus Ordo church will continue down the perditious road they are on — resulting in the Vatican becoming a shtetl and the churches becoming synagogues with noahides sitting in the pews.

Related:

• Francis appoints two Talmudic rabbis as members of the Pontifical Academy Of Life

• update on the new member of the Pontifical Academy Of Life — Rabbi Avraham Steinberg, M.D.

• What Francis meant when he said the church must “honestly recognize her weaknesses and shortcomings” and join the “cultural revolution”

• Why is abortion the ‘Law of the land’ in America?

Why is abortion the ‘Law of the land’ in America?

 source: Sefaria, The William Davidson Talmud, Sanhedrin 72b.14 (censored)

Michael A. Hoffman II writes in, America is under Talmudic law, not Sharia law:

“Pursuers come in all shapes and sizes. They can even be Judaic children. Americans have often expressed dismay and amazement at how, in 1973, the U.S. Supreme Court did not only legalize abortion at 12 or 16 weeks gestation. The Court, in conformity with the Talmud, legalized abortion on demand at any time during the pregnancy, including a few minutes before the baby is born. This abominable crime is permissible in those lands where the Talmud exerts dominion.

The relevant halacha is found in the uncensored text of the Talmud Bavli (“Bavli” denotes Babylon), in Sanhedrin 72b, where a mother believes her unborn baby is endangering her life by “pursuing” her. According to the Talmud, this unborn infant rodef can be eliminated at any time during the pregnancy, except when the mother is actually giving birth and the head of the child becomes visible.

“Before the baby is born, it is not considered a living soul, and it is therefore not subject to the halakhot (law) of murder.” — Koren Talmud Bavli: Sanhedrin Part Two (Jerusalem, 2017), p. 155.

Right wing campaigners against the alleged imminent imposition of Sharia law announce that they are defending the “Constitution against Islam.” We have never seen a case where Islamic law profoundly influenced members of the Supreme Court. We have, however, observed repeated Talmudic influence over how the court interprets the Constitution in the modern era. Roe v. Wade is one example. Another is the “discovery” of a Constitutional right to legalize the marriage of sodomites. It goes without saying that the Founders envisioned no such right, just as the Bible made no allowance for a usurping Talmud. 

In the religion that is directed by the Talmud, there is no legislature. All laws are made by judicial decision. It just so happens that this is how much of the supreme law of the land is made in America. Another name for “activist judge” is Talmudic judge.

Our nation is under Talmudic law, not Sharia, though immense troops of Protestant and Catholic ignoramuses display their cluelessness as they crusade with intense fervor against a non-existent menace, while oblivious to the cancer eating at the bowels of our nation. 

One wants to be charitable. One hesitates to overtax rhetoric and apply the word idiocy to the victims of what is a constantly mutating virus of deception that has hoodwinked them and 99% of the conservative movement. In lieu of such rhetoric, an observation of C. Wright Mills comes to mind, “We are at a curious juncture in the history of human insanity.””

source: On the Contrary, America is under Talmudic law, not Sharia law

 source: Encyclopedia of Jewish Medical Ethics, Volume 1, 
ABORTION & MISCARRIAGE, pp. 8 - 9 

*Keep in mind that the editor of the Encyclopedia of Jewish Medical Ethics, Rabbi Avraham Steinberg, M.D., was appointed personally by Francis to the Pontifical Academy Of Life on 13 June 2017. This appointment of a Talmudist and Francis’ near silence on abortion tells one all they need to know about the direction the Novus Ordo is heading.

 source: Sefaria, Shooting Down a Hijacked Plane: Killing a few to save the lives of many

For additional information see, Life and Potential Life: Abortion in Jewish Tradition.