Showing posts with label rape. Show all posts
Showing posts with label rape. Show all posts

Friday, June 9, 2017

Who would have ever guessed that the communist, Bernie Sanders, is also anti-Christian?


Someone sounds like a Judaic supremacist here




For those who don't know, Bernie Sanders is a Jewish freemason who is coy about his religion.  The reason for this is he lived on Kibbutz Sha’ar HaAmakim which is Stalinist in their outlook.  He has vast support in the USA from Socialists (i.e. closet communists).  He is a partner of the Chabad-Lubavitchers and was instrumental in helping them put their giant ahistorical menorahs in front of city halls across the country.  What’s wrong with saying that people who have rejected Jesus the Christ are condemned Bernie?  After all, didn’t you write that a woman when having intercourse with her man enjoys fantasizing being raped by three men?  What about the fraud your wife committed while president of the now closed Burlington College?  What is the relationship between Talmudic Judaism, fraud, communism, rape, and your irrational anti-Christian stance Mr. Sanders?  Are you running mop-up duty for your Chabad handlers ensuring that only Christians who don’t believe their faith are appointed to government offices?



Bernie Sanders has no problem with religion and government mixing 
as long as its his racial-supremacist Talmudic Judaism.


**** WARNING DISTURBING ESSAY ON RAPE ****

Here’s Mr. Sanders who is offended by Christianity writing an essay on rape.

Friday, September 16, 2016

A message to Germans from Haim Sabam

Enjoy being Moslem!!!


*Mr. Saban owns the television channel "ProSieben" under his company Lavena Holding 4 GmbH and uses it as well as other channels he owns to sell a pro-zionist noahide-dhimmitude message to unsuspecting viewers.


More on Haim Saban: 




***** WARNING SEXUAL CONTENT ***** 
***** IN THE ***** 
***** VIDEO BELOW ***** 

... 
... 
... 
... 
... 
... 
... 
... 
... 
... 
... 
... 
... 
... 
... 
... 

the government of Germany’s message to the Moslem invaders

Sunday, August 28, 2016

Vatican caught covering up sex crimes


Vatican Officials Ordered Destruction of Evidence




Hear No Evil,



See No Evil,



Blah, Blah, Blah...




Talk is cheap and Francis has a lot of it.
 

From the Motu Proprio, Come una madre amorevole, dated 4 June 2016:

The Church loves all her children like a loving mother, but cares for all and protects with a special affection those who are smallest and defenseless. This is the duty that Christ himself entrusted to the entire Christian community as a whole. Aware of this, the Church is especially vigilant in protecting children and vulnerable adults.
[...]
Canon Law already provides for the possibility of removal from ecclesiastical office “for grave reasons”. This pertains to diocesan Bishops and Eparchs as well, and those who are by law equal to them (cf. can. 193 § 1 CIC; can. 975 § 1 CCEO). With this Letter my intention is to underline that among the aforesaid “grave reasons” is the negligence of a Bishop in the exercise of his office, and in particular in relation to cases of sexual abuse inflicted on minors and vulnerable adults, as stated in the Motu ProprioSacramentorum Sanctitatis Tutela promulgated by St John Paul II and amended by my beloved Predecessor, Benedict XVI. In such cases the following procedure is to be observed:
Article 1: § 3. In the case of the abuse of minors and vulnerable adults it is enough that the lack of diligence be grave. 



He’s all talk and no action when it comes to this grave matter.



Related:

Tuesday, June 7, 2016

Abp. Lefebvre on Moslem ‘immigrants’

Compare and contrast Abp. Marcel Lefebvre’s words to the recent videos of Bp. Fellay (#1) (#2) or Francis and his cohorts who want to welcome all these Moslem invaders with open arms as they will help bring about the destruction of what is left of Christian Europe.


Francis and company welcome Moslems!



What Archbishop Lefebvre had to say in 1989


During a gathering of the press in France on November 14, 1989, Archbishop Lefebvre was accused of affirming that “the best  [thing] for the Moslems [to do] would be to go back home.” He added that, in France, the Moslems are going “to impose their laws little by little. Christian law cannot be in accord with Islamic law... Moslems cannot be Catholic, they cannot be truly French. We must not allow them to organize themselves politically or religiously. The construction of mosques is a catastrophe!” Turning towards the journalists, His Grace added: “It will be your wives, your daughters, your children, who will be kidnapped and taken away to hidden living quarters in Casablanca.” 
The International League Against Racism and Anti‑Semitism (the LICRA ‑ The French equivalent of the American Civil Liberties Union) brought a civil lawsuit against Archbishop Lefebvre, accusing him of racism and defamation with respect to the Moslem community. At the conclusion of the trial, His Grace was cleared of the charge of racism but, as if making a gesture of compromise, he was found guilty of defamation with respect to the Moslem community and fined 5,000 French francs($1,010.). Archbishop Lefebvre has, of course, appealed this iniquitous judgment! He has only to prove that what he said about the kidnapping of white girls for the harems of the Moslems is true. Since this is a public fact there is no defamation whatsoever with respect to the Moslems. On the contrary, it is an extraordinary scandal and a fact which must be published so that people will realize that we are in the midst of a giant struggle between the true religion and Mohammed’s substitute, Islam. It is in the midst of the threat of a Middle Eastern war that we realize who are the true enemies of the Catholic and European civilization, of which we are the heirs 

Declaration Preliminary to the Court Case of June 21, 1990
Sirs, 
Invoking the laws of July 29, 1981, and July 1, 1977, 1 am accused firstly of the crime of provocation to discrimination, to hatred or to racial violence with respect to a group of persons on account of their origin or their belonging to a particular ethnic group, nation, race or religion. 
Secondly, of the crime of public defamation with respect to this group... I am supposed to have pronounced these provocative and defamatory words when I held a press conference at the Crillon Hotel on November 14, 1989. I affirm firstly that I did not hold a press conference. I had nothing written and I made no declaration. I only wanted to reply to the journalists’ questions on the occasion of the ceremony for the 60th anniversary of my Priestly Ordination at the Bourget. 
You must admit that Moslem immigration had no special reason to be brought up on this occasion. The least one can say is that my reply was not pre‑meditated. I therefore replied very freely, giving my opinion of the danger of Islamic penetration into a country whose Catholic religion is violently rejected and despised by Islam. The Koran, which is the law of Islam, provokes to discrimination, to hatred and to violence. Do not attribute to me that which I denounce. 
The proofs of this hatred and of this violence are legion both in the past and in the present. 
For as long as Moslems are an insignificant minority in a Christian country they can live in a friendly way, because they follow the laws and customs of the country which accepts them. But as soon as they are numerous and organized they become aggressive and they seek to impose their laws, which are hostile to European civilization. Examples are abundant. Soon they will take charge of our city councils, and will transform our churches into mosques. We will either have to become Moslem, leave the country or become their captives. This is in the profound nature of Islam. It is not I who am racist in denouncing this very racism. 
The pretended defamation is only the statement of obvious facts. Kidnapping of white girls is well known to the police and it still exists today. It is not defamation to denounce the kidnappers of our compatriots. It is to call upon justice and demand the protection of our fellow citizens. If you prevent us from crying out against the nefarious consequences of Islam’s penetration of France and Europe, you render yourselves accomplices to the violence committed in the name of the Koran by Islam in our Christian countries. It is they who have undertaken this procedure against us, a procedure which truly shows the fundamental racism of Islam against the French, against the Jews and against every religion which is not Moslem. 
It is not I who am racist because I denounce racism. I lived all my life in the midst of other races ‑ thirty years in Africa, among animists and Moslems. There I strove to bring them both spiritual and material goods ‑ schools, hospitals, etc. They showed their gratitude in decorating me as Officer of the Equatorial Star of Gabon and Grand Officer of the National Order of Senegal, and the French government recognized my overseas services by making me Officer of the Legion of Honor. 
To condemn me as a racist because I seek to protect my country which is menaced in its very existence and Christian traditions... this would be to use justice for injustice. This would be the justice at the service of executioners whose victims have at most the right to keep quiet and to perish. This would be the summit of injustice. 
† Marcel Lefebvre  Ecône 
May 12, 1990
source: SSPXAsia, The Archbishop Speaks: Truth, Justice & the News Media

Thursday, January 15, 2015

Francis & the Salvation Army


On the airplane trip from Colombo to Manila, Francis made a remark about the Salvation Army during his in-flight interview.

"Do you know what was the first experience I had of ecumenism? I told it to some days ago when I met a group from the Salvation Army. When I was four or five years old walking down the street with my grandmother, I saw two women from the Salvation Army, wearing those old-style hats, and I asked my grandmother, “Tell me, are they sisters (nuns)?” My Grandmother said “No, they are Protestant but they’re good (people).” It was the first time that I heard a person speaking well of people of another religion. At that time in the catechesis they told us that they all went to hell."

This isn't the first time he has told this story. In the book, The Great Reformer: Francis and the Making of a Radical Pope by Austen Ivereigh one reads,




Francis' guest at the Vatican, the General of the Salvation Army


As recounted above during the in-flight interview Francis told this same story to the delegation from the Salvation Army he invited to the Vatican. (underlines below are ours for emphasis)

The General and his party were shown great respect throughout their journey through the Vatican, with members of the Swiss Guard standing to attention as they passed.

When the Salvation Army group entered the room for their meeting, the Pope moved quickly towards them, warmly greeting each of his visitors. He listened attentively to the greetings brought by the General, which underlined the many things uniting Catholics and Salvationists and spoke of the experiences of cooperation between priests and Salvation Army officers in many areas of the world. He took with him to present to the Pope specially bound copies of the new book Conversations with the Catholic Church, as well as a copy of The Salvation Army Year Book 2015.

In his greeting, the Pope underlined the fact that theological differences between The Salvation Army and the Roman Catholic Church had not impeded the witness of a united sharing of the love of God and neighbour. He described the two as often meeting 'in the same peripheries of society' and described the work of The Salvation Army enabling 'Christ’s light to shine in the darkest recesses of [people's] lives'.

He spontaneously interrupted the reading of his greeting to share an experience of his childhood in Argentina in a time when Protestants were seen as 'bad people who would go to Hell'. He recalled how a four-year-old Jorge Mario Bergoglio (as Pope Francis was then called) was walking with his grandmother when he saw two Salvation Army women dressed in uniform with 'those strange hats'. ('Do you still wear them?' enquired the Pope.) Jorge asked his grandmother if they were nuns or sisters and she replied: 'No, they are Protestants – but they are good.'

'This,' continued Pope Francis, 'was the first sermon ever I heard about ecumenism – and [it] has influenced me in my ecumenical walk.'

Francis thanks the Salvation Army



We can already hear the naysayers, "the Salvation Army is made up of good people who help the poor!"




Rev. Rumble & Rev. Carty in their books Radio Replies, vol. I-III, address the subject of the Salvation Army in volume number two.

Salvation Army

1312. Does the Catholic Church recognize the Salvation Army as in any way representative of genuine Christianity?

No. As a religious body the Salvation Army is a form of Protestantism which the Catholic Church cannot but reject. It was founded by William Booth, an ex-Wesleyan minister. Disagreeing with Methodist ways, he left the Wesleyans in 1861 to become an independent evangelist. In 1865 he and his wife began to devote themselves to street preaching and rescue work in the slums of London. In 1877 he organized his converts into the Salvation Army, with himself as General, with the avowed purpose of working for the conversion of the poor and the alleviation of their temporal needs. But the whole movement is characterized by an un-Catholic, and even an anti-Catholic outlook.

1313. Does not the Army agree with the Catholic Church that men owe their redemption to the Precious Blood of Christ?

Yes. But the Salvation Army has an extremely Protestant view of the nature of the Christian religion in other vital points—a view radically opposed to the Catholic concept. Where the Army preaches, "Believe on Christ and be saved," the Catholic Church insists that no one, whilst still in this life, can actually be termed "saved"; and that it is the will of Christ that all should believe in the Catholic Church, accepting all that she teaches and commands in the name of Christ. This involves acceptance of the Catholic Faith, the worship of God by assistance at the Sacrifice of the Mass, the reception of the Sacraments instituted by Christ, and the fulfillment of those good works for the love of God which are demanded by Christian virtue.

1314. Through the Salvation Army God provides for a certain class of people not reached by the Catholic Church.

God does not need the Salvation Army for that. He can provide by divine grace for men outside the fold of the Catholic Church in a thousand and one ways. He does so for infidels, Mahometans, Anglicans, Presbyterians, Methodists, Adventists, and a host of others. If the apparent good done by the Salvation Army is proof that God Himself inspired its creation, then the apparent good done by all other Protestant organizations is proof that He inspired them also. And we cannot admit that God inspired all these conflicting religious bodies—bodies, also, which unite in denying the claims of that Catholic Church which Christ did undoubtedly establish.

1315. Are not Salvation Army methods preferable for simple people incapable of intellectual study to the Catholic Sacramental system?

Under no circumstances could we say that. For, firstly, we can never admit that any means devised by men could be preferable to those instituted by Christ Himself. Secondly, we cannot say that the Catholic Sacramental system is in any way unsuitable for simple people; for Catholic children are well able to appreciate the significance of the Sacraments and to benefit by them. The value of the Sacraments does not depend upon the intellectual capabilities of the recipients. Thirdly, you seem to argue on merely natural grounds, not making sufficient allowance for the fact that Catholic Faith is a gift of divine grace, which is as difficult for intellectual people to attain as for simple people, and as easy for simple people as for intellectuals.

1316. The Catholic way may be better for some types of people, but the Salvation Army way is superior for others.

Our Lord gave His religion for all mankind, and that religion is the Catholic religion. Had He thought variations necessary for different types, He would have incorporated them in the religion He established. He did not do so. Nor can a way which involves the preaching of heresy be better for anybody in reality and absolutely speaking, whatever good it may accidentally accomplish or occasion. I am discussing the matter from the viewpoint of principle, of course. Though I do not think the Salvation Army justified as a substitute for the true Catholic Church, I have an immense admiration of the zeal and sincerity of its members; their demonstration of the courage of their convictions, and the sacrifices they make; the indifference to the world on the part of women members exhibited by their modest dress and behavior. But, with all their good will, they support and continue a movement which ignores and is independent of the true Church established by Christ.

1317. The conclusion would be that the Salvation Army has a God-appointed, and not merely a man-designed place in this world.

Though the Salvation Army has the best of intentions, there is no doubt that it is a man-designed enterprise for religious purposes. General Booth was a good man who wanted to do something for God and the salvation of souls. Being a stranger to the Catholic religion, and not satisfied with any other Church, he had to fall back on his own ideas. But they were very much his own ideas. However, though not God-appointed, the Salvation Army has resulted in much good, and in many genuine conversions from evil ways of living. And the explanation of that is simply this: Many a good man mistakenly does what is wrong with the best of intentions. In such cases, God overlooks the mistake, and even in spite of it blesses that man, and makes his work an occasion of blessing to others. But it always remains true that the work itself was really in opposition to God's will. Such is the position of General Booth and the Salvation Army. We Catholics rejoice at the sight of any good the Salvation Army may accomplish. But we are compelled to regret that it should be regarded by its members as a sufficient form of the Christian religion, and be allowed to occupy that place in the lives of its adherents which should really be held by Catholicism only. Many are thus contented to remain outside the Catholic Church, and to have so much less than our Lord really intended them to possess.

We can still hear the naysayers, "So what?  They still do good and Francis said they are ecumenical.  Get with the times!"

What the Catholic Sacraments are not important to you?  OK, we have more on the Salvation Army.




The Salvation Army and abortion

Screenshot of Salvation Army's page on abortion


Whoops, sorry if you are a product of a rape.  The Salvation Army doesn't want you to live, they want you to die!  If four of our friends' mothers felt the same way, they would have never been our friends because they would have been murdered, not to mention the families they have started which would have never existed!   To Francis, members of the Salvation Army are just good people doing good things.

What does the Salvation Army say about birth control?

Screenshot of Salvation Army's page on abortion


Salvation Army & Planned Parenthood



That's very cut and dry isn't it?


 Francis praying with the General of the Salvation Army

When he met with the representatives of the Salvation Army, Francis said the following,

"I earnestly hope that Catholics and Salvationists will continue to offer a common witness to Christ and to the Gospel in a world so much in need of experiencing God’s boundless mercy.

Catholics and Salvationists, together with other Christians, recognise that those in need have a special place in God’s heart, so much so that the Lord Jesus Christ himself became poor for our sake (cf. 2 Corinthians 8:9). As a result, Catholics and Salvationists often meet in the same peripheries of society. It is my hope that our shared faith in Jesus Christ the Saviour, the one mediator between God and man (cf. 1 Timothy 2:5), will become evermore the firm foundation of friendship and cooperation between us.

'The Church which "goes forth" is a community of missionary disciples who take the first step, who are involved and supportive, who bear fruit and rejoice. An evangelising community knows that the Lord has taken the initiative; he has loved us first (cf. 1 John 4:19), and therefore we can move forward, boldly take the initiative, go out to others, seek those who have fallen away, stand at the crossroads, and welcome the outcast. Such a community has an endless desire to show mercy, the fruit of its own experience of the power of the Father’s infinite mercy' (Apostolic Exhortation Evangelii Gaudium, 24).

I pray that in today’s world all of Christ’s disciples will make their contribution with the same conviction and dynamism that The Salvation Army demonstrates in its devoted and highly appreciated service. The differences between Catholics and Salvationists regarding theological and ecclesiological questions need not impede the witness of our shared love of God and love of neighbour, a love which is capable of inspiring a concerted commitment to restoring the dignity of those who live on the margins of society.

Dear friends, I pray to God for the work of The Salvation Army. May many people in difficulty continue to rely on your efforts, which enable Christ’s light to shine in the darkest recesses of their lives. May you and your fellow Salvationists be filled with the Holy Spirit’s gifts of wisdom, understanding, fortitude and peace, and so witness to the Lord’s Kingdom in our suffering world. And I ask that you also pray for me."

We at Call Me Jorge... guess that unwanted pregnancies and unborn children are not equal in Francis' eyes to the outcasts who occupy the peripheries.  Are not all souls important to God?  Why isn't this the same with Francis? 


The Salvation Army, ringing the bell and collecting money for abortion mills!

Saturday, June 14, 2014

Fruits of the Novus Ordo

(WARNING: Not for viewing by children or those easily offended. The questions directed at Robert Carlson are about raping children in his diocese. WARNING)

clip taken from deposition of Archbishop of St Louis, Robert Carlson



or