Actor, Johnny Depp and comedian Jimmy Kimmel make out on Jimmy Kimmel Live!
For those who have never heard of James Christian "Jimmy" Kimmel, he is a comedian and host of a North American late-night talk show named Jimmy Kimmel Live! Mr. Kimmel was raised Catholic and also was an altar boy when growing up. He is divorced from his first wife, Gina Kimmel, and currently married to Molly McNearney. In between his two wives he co-habitated with a Christ hater, Sarah Silverman. Besides blaspheming Christ in her stand-up routines, Silverman is very active in the pro-abortion movement and in the Talmudic religion. Why bring up Jimmy Kimmel? Well, he is the perfect example of what passes today for a Catholic. No word if he got an annulment from his first wife but he must have since he said of his then upcoming second wedding,
Recently, the videos(click here &here) about Planned Parenthood and Stem Express have surfaced. The mainstream media, in reality five interlocked companies, didn't like the negative attention being paid to these two companies so they did something about it. The news shows on all their outlets covered the the killing of a lion by a dentist which happened early this month. Oh the outrage, why it was so horrible this dentist killed a lion! Ignore the murder of millions upon millions of children and focus on this politically correct story. The White House even announced they were going to open an investigation, no not on the murder of human beings but on the killing of this lion! Back to Mr. Kimmel, on his late-night talk show he went off on how horrible the dentist was an even shed a tear or two for the poor lion.
No tears for aborted children
Maybe if babies had GPS trackers in the womb and Oxford was doing a study on them, Jimmy would be outraged. Or maybe if they had chopped the lion up and sold him for medical research it would be OK for Kimmel.
Here's Jimmy on the Howard Stern Show telling a joke:
STERN: Does anyone go over your material first — anyone from the president’s organization or anything?
KIMMEL: No. Nobody even hinted at asking to see my material.
STERN: Were there jokes you left out because you felt they were too harsh about the president?
KIMMEL: Yeah, there were. Yeah. I mean, you know…
STERN: You wouldn’t have felt comfortable delivering it because it would have been over the top?
KIMMEL: Like, I decided right off the bat that the N word was out.
STERN: You did, that’s not like you. You use the N word every night in your monologue at least twice. [Both laugh]
KIMMEL: I had some jokes about — like Rick Santorum. I said something like — well, I didn’t say it, but: Newt Gingrich’s campaign is so dead Mitt Romney wants to baptize it and Rick Santorum wants to put it in a jar and show it to his kids.
STERN: You didn’t want any abortion jokes?
KIMMEL: People went like, uh-oh. I ran it by people who go to this thing.
STERN: Who do you run it by?
KIMMEL: There’s a guy named Jake Tapper at ABC News, I ran jokes by him. He’s been there a lot of times. There are a few other people — reporters.
The reference to Rick Santorum was Kimmel mocking the miscarriage of Rick's wife and his grieving family. Wow Mr. Kimmel, you shed a tear for a lion but not for a child. Do you pray to the same god as Francis?
Kimmel has mocked Tim Tebow's anti-abortion commercial, had pro-life demonstrators arrested on the public sidewalk outside the theater his show is filmed at, and also mocked people who believe marriage is between a man and a woman. How many jokes has he made about the Holocaust?
This makes Jimmy just like Francis in that everything is fair game except what is sacred to the Talmudists. Guess they both don't want to bite the hand that feeds them.
Don't let the EWTN video or the rabbis quoted in it fool you. The Talmudists are foaming at the mouth that the pre-planned environmental regulations can be codified into law. Good-bye sovereignty, hello world government. More money and power for them and their partners in crime.
These rabbis are no fans of Christ but they love Francis!
# 53. These situations have caused sister earth, along with all the abandoned of our world, to cry out, pleading that we take another course. Never have we so hurt and mistreated our common home as we have in the last two hundred years. Yet we are called to be instruments of God our Father, so that our planet might be what he desired when he created it and correspond with his plan for peace, beauty and fullness. The problem is that we still lack the culture needed to confront this crisis. We lack leadership capable of striking out on new paths and meeting the needs of the present with concern for all and without prejudice towards coming generations. The establishment of a legal framework which can set clear boundaries and ensure the protection of ecosystems has become indispensable; otherwise, the new power structures based on the techno-economic paradigm may overwhelm not only our politics but also freedom and justice.
# 73.Enforceable international agreements are urgently needed, since local authorities are not always capable of effective intervention. Relations between states must be respectful of each other’s sovereignty, but must also lay down mutually agreed means of averting regional disasters which would eventually affect everyone. Global regulatory norms are needed to impose obligations and prevent unacceptable actions, for example, when powerful companies dump contaminated waste or offshore polluting industries in other countries.
# 174. Let us also mention the system of governance of the oceans. International and regional conventions do exist, but fragmentation and the lack of strict mechanisms of regulation, control and penalization end up undermining these efforts. The growing problem of marine waste and the protection of the open seas represent particular challenges. What is needed, in effect, is an agreement on systems of governance for the whole range of so-called “global commons”.
# 175.The same mindset which stands in the way of making radical decisions to reverse the trend of global warming also stands in the way of achieving the goal of eliminating poverty. A more responsible overall approach is needed to deal with both problems: the reduction of pollution and the development of poorer countries and regions. The twenty-first century, while maintaining systems of governance inherited from the past, is witnessing a weakening of the power of nation states, chiefly because the economic and financial sectors, being transnational, tends to prevail over the political. Given this situation, it is essential to devise stronger and more efficiently organized international institutions, with functionaries who are appointed fairly by agreement among national governments, and empowered to impose sanctions. As Benedict XVI has affirmed in continuity with the social teaching of the Church: “To manage the global economy; to revive economies hit by the crisis; to avoid any deterioration of the present crisis and the greater imbalances that would result; to bring about integral and timely disarmament, food security and peace; to guarantee the protection of the environment and to regulate migration: for all this, there is urgent need of a true world political authority, as my predecessor Blessed John XXIII indicated some years ago”.[129] Diplomacy also takes on new importance in the work of developing international strategies which can anticipate serious problems affecting us all.
Is the newest video released by The Center for Medical Progress we watch an employee of Planned Parenthood explain how babies are born alive then murdered for their body parts. As the video continues one can listen to how Planned Parenthood breaks State & Federal Laws in the trafficking of these baby parts. If this is being done in one country, surely it is being done in other countries. Where is Francis? Where is the outcry from the Catholic church? Nowhere to be seen or heard, instead we have Francis meeting with every communist/socialist head of state under the sun and handing them a copy of his newest encyclical Laudato si'. Why talk about abortion, when one can be a shill for the financiers and help enslave the peoples of the world with legislation all the while telling them they are saving the planet from global warming!
*** News flash for Francis ***
For God so loved the world, as to give his only begotten Son; that
whosoever believeth in him, may not perish, but may have life
everlasting. For God sent not his Son into the world, to judge the
world, but that the world may be saved by him. John 3, 16-17
Hence the planet doesn't need to be saved, souls need to be saved! What god is Francis praying to that he doesn't understand this simple fact of the Faith? It's always about the body and material comforts with Francis never about saving the souls of people. Doesn't he know there are four mortal sins which cry out to heaven for vengeance? Expect more blather about globull warming and spiritual hugs for everyone around. Thanks to The Center for Medical Progress for releasing these videos which contain hard evidence of what many suspected was being done. When one makes a living as a professional murder...one has no shame. May God helps us end abortion.
Babies born alive then murdered for body parts
"The most serious of the evils that afflict the world these days are youth unemployment and the loneliness of the old."
At a Fraternité Sacerdotale Saint Pie X (FSSPX) baptism one would think they would find Catholic behavior but at this baptism everyone failed to do their Catholic duty. The FSSPX bills itself as the last bastion of Catholicism that will one
day restore Catholic tradition in the world. Take a look at the the
photos. Notice anything?
Here are the two photos in question:
We at Call Me Jorge... certainly do!
The woman is wearing a very short dress with cap sleeves. Anything else? Yes, not one person saw
to it to tell this woman she was immodestly dressed. Not Bp. Fellay,
who she is standing in front of, nor the priests participating in the
baptism of the bells, nor the hundreds in attendance! Padre Pio
wouldn't let the woman into the confessional let alone ring a bell which
has just been baptized.
If that weren't bad enough, the FSSPX priest in charge of the webpage posted the two photos.
What's going on? Why does the FSSPX think this is a modest form of dress?
Sometimes the most simple and obvious answer
is the best one but this time we'll instead ask our favorite lawyer over at the
Remnant Newspaper to chime in. (We didn't really ask Mr. Ferrara.)
"It's Diabolical Disorientation!", says Christopher Ferrara.
See, Mr. Ferrara has a reoccurring case of Diabolical Disorientation and he is in regular contact with Michael Matt on webcam who he infected who then passed it on to Bp. Fellay when they met in Menzingen, Switzerland. Fellay didn't notice anything different until he felt a little sluggish in France but the show must go on. As a result all in attendance came down with cases of Diabolical Disorientation.
The fateful day Mr. Matt passed Diabolical Disorientation on to Bp. Fellay.
That has to be the answer right?
It's not like Bp. Fellay associates with Zionists and accepts money from usurers does he Chris?
"Diabolical Disorientation!"
What did you say?
"Diabolical Disorientation!"
Sounds a bit silly and complicated doesn't it?
"Diabolical Disorientation!"
Thanks for clearing that up Chris!
That is certainly more plausible than the simple answer that they
(FSSPX) don't know Catholicism very well or if they do, they don't
practice it.
Can anyone from the FSSPX can shed some light in this?
We thought it prudent to ask another simple question.
Is Fellay changing modernist Rome or modernist Rome changing Fellay?
The staff at Call Me Jorge... looked on the internet everywhere we could think of and even asked Rome if they had a photo of Francis with a woman in a mini-skirt. Nada! Zilch! What did we find out? The dress code section on the Vatican's website for Papal Audiences.
Women can wear trousers, capri pants and skirts and dresses are permitted however they cannot be shorter than knee length and shoulders must be covered.
In very hot weather a shawl or large scarf/Pashmina can be draped around the shoulders for visiting the sites.
Bare shoulders and short skirts are not permitted and again come prepared to cover up if wearing shorts.
Accepted
Women
- The knees covered
- At least short sleeves
Rejected
- Shorts
- T-shirts without sleeves
- Short skirts
- Baseball caps inside the churches
Even the Vatican has a little bit of semblance of a woman dressing modestly if she is wearing a skirt or dress. We wonder if a woman wearing trousers is also acceptable to the FSSPX as it is to the Vatican?
If someone over at the FSSPX knows what happened, by all
means, please fill us in with the information in the comments section
below.
Bp. Fellay and all those in attendance would do well to study up on Catholic standards of dress and then put them into practice. Some handy resources they which they can start their studies with are:
In addition to a her above mentioned book, Colleen Hammond has a Pinterest board on modest fashion which is an excellent resource where women can find modest clothes which are stylish.
This man has an opinion on every trite matter and never shuts up but continue to expect many more strong silent statements from him concerning Catholic morals and doctrine.
Fr. Lombardi implies that: Francis is a dictator who rules without counsel, keeps those under him in a constant state of confusion (à la Vladimir Putin, see Adam Curtis video on Vladislov Surkov), and is a revolutionary bent on revolutionizing the office of the papacy and the Vatican structures.
"When Federico Wals, who had spent several years as Bergoglio’s
press aide, traveled from Buenos Aires to Rome last year to see the
pope, he first paid a visit to Father Federico Lombardi, the longtime
Vatican communications official whose job essentially mirrors Wals’s old
one, albeit on a much larger scale. “So, Father,” the Argentine asked,
“how do you feel about my former boss?” Managing a smile, Lombardi
replied, “Confused.”
Lombardi had served as the spokesman for Benedict, formerly
known as Joseph Ratzinger, a man of Germanic precision. After meeting
with a world leader, the former pope would emerge and rattle off an
incisive summation, Lombardi tells me, with palpable wistfulness: “It
was incredible. Benedict was so clear. He would say, ‘We have spoken
about these things, I agree with these points, I would argue against
these other points, the objective of our next meeting will be this’—two
minutes and I’m totally clear about what the contents were. With
Francis—‘This is a wise man; he has had these interesting experiences.’”
Chuckling somewhat helplessly, Lombardi adds, “Diplomacy for
Francis is not so much about strategy but instead, ‘I have met this
person, we now have a personal relation, let us now do good for the
people and for the church.’”
The pope’s spokesman elaborates on the Vatican’s new ethos while
sitting in a small conference room in the Vatican Radio building, a
stone’s throw from the Tiber River. Lombardi wears rumpled priest attire
that matches his expression of weary bemusement. Just yesterday, he
says, the pope hosted a gathering in Casa Santa Marta of 40 Jewish
leaders—and the Vatican press office learned about it only after the
fact. “No one knows all of what he’s doing,” Lombardi says. “His
personal secretary doesn’t even know. I have to call around: One person
knows one part of his schedule, someone else knows another part.”
The Vatican’s communications chief shrugs and observes, “This is the life.”"
"...In attempting to divine the 78-year-old pope’s comings and
goings, the closest Vatican officials have to an intermediary has been
Cardinal Pietro Parolin, Francis’s secretary of state, a much respected
veteran diplomat—and, importantly, trusted by his boss, according to
Wals, “because he’s not too ambitious, and the pope knows that. That’s a
fundamental quality for the pope.” At the same time, Francis has
drastically reduced the secretary of state’s powers, particularly with
respect to the Vatican’s finances. “The problem with this,” Lombardi
says, “is that the structure of the curia is no longer clear. The
process is ongoing, and what will be at the end, no one knows. The
secretary of state is not as centralized, and the pope has many
relations that are directed by him alone, without any mediation.”
Valiantly accentuating the upside, the Vatican spokesman
adds, “In a sense, this is positive, because in the past there were
criticisms that someone had too much power over the pope. They cannot
say this is the case now.”"
Dolan isn't wearing his pectoral cross in this photo. It appears he left it at home as he was spending the evening with his fellow Talmudists celebrating the career of Abe Foxman.
"If the world hate you, know ye, that it hath hated me before you.
If you had been of the world, the world would love its own: but because
you are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world,
therefore the world hateth you.
Remember my word that I said to you: The servant is not greater than
his master. If they have persecuted me, they will also persecute you: if
they have kept my word, they will keep yours also. But all these things they will do to you for my name' s sake: because they know not him who sent me. If I had not come, and spoken to them, they would not have sin; but now they have no excuse for their sin. He that hateth me, hateth my Father also.
If I had not done among them the works that no other man hath done,
they would not have sin; but now they have both seen and hated both me
and my Father. But that the word may be fulfilled which is written in their law: They hated me without cause."
Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio became Pope Francis I on March 13, 2013; by December, he was Time’s “Man of the Year”; and in January, the Huffington Post announced rave reviews by the “Forward 50 list of top American Jews” as well.
Calling the Jewish People “Our big brothers” on the 75th
anniversary of Kristallnacht certainly helped, as did his giving Rabbi
Abraham Skorka (of the Seminario Rabinico Latinoamericano) an honorary
doctorate from the Catholic University of Argentina.
But this Jewish adulation is also a sigh of relief following an era
when Jewish-Catholic relationships seemed again to be in jeopardy. After
centuries of Catholic enmity over the Jewish “rejection” of Christ,
Vatican II had surprised the world with its1963 affirmation that God
still “holds the Jews most dear” and “does not repent of the calls He
issues.” That is to say, Judaism has not, after all, been superseded by
Christianity; Jews should not be reviled as Christ killers; and
Christian anti-Semitism must cease.
That was the liberalizing era of Popes John XXIII and Paul VI,
however. With their successors, John Paul II and then Benedict XVI, the
revival of conservative forces in the Vatican made Jews suspect the
imminent return also of medieval Catholic separatism.
When Francis
reasserted the “common roots” of Jews and Christians, and the reminder
that “a true Christian cannot be anti-Semitic,” Jews concluded that the
gains of Vatican II might be here to stay.
But the Jewish love affair with Francis isn’t all about self-interest.
An article in Haaretz (Anshei Pfeffer, “Pope Francis Cannot
save Us.” Dec. 11, 2013) got it right: “In the total absence of truly
charismatic political or spiritual figures, in a generation where
Israel’s elected leaders and rabbis constantly make us cringe with their
outrageous statements or despair at their hopeless blandness,
Bergoglio… extends some hope that we may yet see some wise old men [sic]
of faith in our lifetime.”
We would say “men and women” not just “men”; being “old” has nothing
to do with it; and the issue is not just Israel. But otherwise, hurray
for Haaretz for observing that the positive public voice of
Judaism has been wanting. Whatever happened to the Jewish visionaries
who spoke truths instead of platitudes, posited promises of Jewish
purpose rather than threats to Jewish continuity, held out hope for a
troubled world, and made us proud to know that our Judaism is deep and
wise, compassionate and compelling?
Who remembers the days when Abraham Joshua Heschel spoke poetically
and prophetically to reassure a worldwide audience that religion still
had something important to say? Or when thousands of Reform Jews
gathered biennially, to hear Rabbi Alexander Schindler demand that they
act boldly, think creatively, and make a difference?
The relative dearth of such voices today is a generational flaw, not
because rabbis now are less able, but because of the way they have been
trained (their “spiritual formation,” in theological language). Heschel
and Schindler took it for granted that as experts in Jewish tradition,
rabbis think deeply, speak boldly, and command a bully pulpit. Seeing
flaws in this “Big Man” model of leadership, their students (my
generation) emphasized alternative strategies like team work,
collaboration, and facilitating group process.
So far so good – but we went too far: confusing authoritarianism with authority, we stopped speaking authoritatively.
Congregations aid and abet this downfall of authority by making
rabbis managers, bureaucrats and apparatchiks. Success is attending
meetings and managing a process that slowly creaks along while people
forget why it is creaking altogether.
The economy hasn’t helped either: those in positions of national
authority (not just Jews but everyone) exhaust themselves just to avoid
closing plants and programs – leaving little time or energy to think or
to proclaim anything. The national mood too is at fault for thriving on
negativity and crippling great vision with a lethal combination of
parsimonious bookkeeping and meanness of spirit.
What is the point of religion in the first place, however, if not to
insist on vision, especially where the complexities of life seem to
foster helplessness and hopelessness, precisely our situation today?
So along comes Francis, a welcome reminder of religion beyond
bureaucracy, and heralding the best that we must become. I do not agree
with everything he says – his economics, for example; and, no doubt, he
has his own conservative naysayers who cringe at the very things that
make the rest of us stand up and applaud.
But most Jews are on their feet and clapping – not just for Francis,
but for what he represents and what we miss. The responsibility for
making up that loss cannot be laid on the shoulders of the rabbinate
alone. We have all colluded in manufacturing our problem; we must all
work together in solving it.
Synagogues can insist on rabbis with learning and vision – then
expect them to learn and engage them in visioning. Seminaries can demand
that students think deeply, not just hurriedly and passingly;
philanthropists can invest in big ideas with a future, not just reactive
strategies dictated by the past. Jews don’t need Francis; we need
rabbis like him, because without them, it remains unclear why we should
even remain Jewish in the first place.
Kohn, is a well known Jewess in Australia who writes books, articles, produces television specials and does radio interviews on Talmudic Judaism, Buddhism, spirituality, and interreligious dialogue. Some of her publications are: Saints and Saintliness in Judaism, Jewish Thought and the Theory of Evolution, Jews and Violence, Is Jewish Thought Unique, The New Believers: Re-imagining God, and Curious Obsessions in the History of Science and Spirituality. Her television programs include: The Dead Sea Scrolls and on Buddhism East and West.
Listen below to Omar & Abraham describe how they met Jorge Mario Bergolio, what interreligious dialogue is, who influenced them to take the path they have in life, and what Francis means for Christianity as well as the idolatry of Talmudic Judaism & of Mohammedanism.
Mahony's deposition on sodomite child abusers he shielded for years.
Thirty years ago today, Saint John Paul II appointed Roger Mahony to head the Archdiocese of Los Angeles. Since that fateful day, the archdiocese has done nothing if not flourish with scandals, sex-crimes, illegal immigrates, sodomy, financial fraud, ad nauseam... What can one say other than this archdiocese is suffering from the Fruits of Vatican II!
Born in 1932 in Barcelona, Fr. Espinal studied both philosophy and
theology before entering the Jesuit novitiate in Veruela in Zaragoza at
the age of 17.
The same year he traveled to Bergamo,
Italy to study audiovisual journalism. After two years he returned to
Spain and began to work for Spanish radio and television corporation TVE
at the height of Francisco Franco's rule.
Fr.
Espinola denounced the censorships placed on TVE under Franco and left
Spain. He moved to Bolivia in August 1968, where he took over as chair
in the journalism department of the Bolivian Catholic University, and
later become sub-director.
He was granted Bolivian
citizenship in 1970, and over the course of the next 10 years worked in
both the written and radio press, produced documentaries on social
themes and got into screenwriting.
As an avid defender
of human rights, the priest cofounded the Permanent Assembly of Human
Rights in Bolivia in 1976. During the 1971 military coup led by Hugo
Banzer Suarez, Fr. Espinola intervened on behalf of persecuted and
detained politicians and trade unions.
In 1977 he
participated in a three-week-long hunger strike to gain general amnesty
for political exiles, validity of trade unions and the withdrawal of the
army from mining centers.
In 1979 Fr. Espinola founded
the weekly newspaper “Aqui,” which was quickly dubbed “leftist” due to
its anti-establishment views and vocal criticism of government
corruption.
As a result of his work, the priest was kidnapped by a group of paramilitaries March 21, 1980, while on his way home.
According
to police and militants at the time, the militants took Fr. Espinola to
La Paz' Achachicala slaughterhouse, where he was tortured for five
hours before being shot 17 times. His body was found handcuffed and
gagged the next morning.
In 2007, Morales officially
declared March 21 as the “Day of Bolivian Cinema” due to the priest’s
contributions in the area. On that day, cinemas and television channels
are obliged to show national films, particularly relating to the themes
of human rights and indigenous peoples.
Fr. Lombardi noted during a July 6 press briefing that no cause has been opened for Fr. Espinal's beatification.
Luis Espinal Camp, the Marxist-Jesuit priest at work.
Fr. Espinal, who considered himself a "worker priest" remained in the
capital, La Paz, where he lived in a poor neighborhood with two other
Jesuits. He worked as a theater critic for the daily newspaper Presencia
and initially designed his own show on national television, in which he
reported on the "worker priests" and took interviews with members of
the Marxist guerrilla movement Ejército de Liberación Nacional (ELN). In
1971 he was awarded Bolivian citizenship. From that year until his
death he was a member of the Jesuit radio station Radio Fides and chief
editor of the weekly newspaper he founded, Aquí as a mouthpiece left
"popular movements". He supported the miners' movement, founded in 1976
the human rights organization, Asamblea de Derechos Humanos and joined a
public hunger strike in 1977 with the demand for democratization.
Luis
Espinal was one of a number of Jesuits and got closer to various forms
of Marxism. Unlike his brothers he did not go over to armed struggle.
When
the Leftist Nationalist, Lidia Gueiler Tejada from the interim
Revolutionary Nationalist Movement of Bolivia, was the President of the
Republic, Espinal was abducted and murdered on March 21, 1980. Whether
the offenders were sent by the drug cartels that soon afterwards
supported the dictatorship of Luis García Meza Tejada, or from one of
the various rapidly changing, and disempowered military rulers could
never be clarified. Espinal followers see the reason in his public
criticism of an amnesty for crimes during the tenure of President
Banzer.
Luis
Espinal left Spain because he felt stiffled by the censorship of Franco's government. After Luis had lived in Bolivia for a time he wrote that, "The liberation of the workers will be the work of themselves." Yup, that sounds the opposite of what Christ said,"I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No man cometh to the Father, but by me." (John 14,6)
The hammer & sickle crucifix, hand carved by and used by the late Fr. Luis Espinal Camps, S.J. It is kept at the Jesuit headquarters in La Paz, Bolivia.
Francis didn't know Luis Espinal had carved a crucifix like this.
The two medals presented to Francis by Evo Morales. Notice the same hammer & sickle crucifix as the emblem on the top one. Also, the two co-official flags of Bolivia. Since 2009, Bolivia has had two flags. The rainbow colored flag is called the Wiphala of Qullasuyu or the Túpac Katari Wisphala and the rainbow supposedly stands for the indigenous people and the land they live in. Coincidentally, the flag has 7 colors as does the Noahide Rainbow. The Tupac Katari Guerrilla Army (Ejército Guerrillero Túpac Katari) traces its origins to the revolutionaries trained by Che Guevara. We bring this last point up only because one of the Tupac Katari Guerrilla Army's former members, Álvaro García Linera, is the current vice-president of Bolivia.
News media outlets and conservative Catholic websites went into overdrive after the President of Bolivia, Evo Morales, gave the two hammer & sickle crucifixes to Francis as presents. They claimed Francis uttered, “This is not right," when receiving the gift and used a still shot taken out of context, ignoring the smile seen in the video on Francis' face and the fact that he accepted both gifts! Great job reporting guys! Our take on it is that those in the media doing the reporting still see communism as evil and projected their own desires onto Francis and they further didn't do their work, checking what was actually said in the video. In our opinion at Call Me Jorge..., Francis should have slapped Morales across the face for presenting him with blasphemous gifts like this and walked out of the room at the least. Instead of the falsely attributed quote, he said, “I didn't know that.” Doesn't sound like a condemnation does it?
English subtitles of what transpired in brief exchange between Morales and Francis when hammer & sickle crucifix was given
Here is a transcript of the words exchanged between Morales and Francis, extracted from the clips based on the audio and subtitles:
[Morales:] Santidad, han tallado afortunadamente el símbolo de la cruz del martillo y de la hoz que es probablemente obra de Espinal, Luis de Espinal… Interesante como símbolo.
[Francis:] No sabía eso.
[Morales:] Ya lo sabe.
And now the same in English:
[Morales:] Your Holiness, fortunately they have made the symbol of the hammer-and-sickle cross, which is probably the work of Espinal, Luis de Espinal. It’s an interesting symbol.
Rome Reports finally corrects their error, kind of
Are
you sitting down dear reader? The Vatican said, the hammer &
sickle cross was not a sign of ideology but one of dialogue! They used the same explanation Xavier Albo gave. Thanks for
the clarification Fr. Lombardi. The communists should remember that
line next time they are massacring Christians.
Instead of reading Francis' new encyclical Laudato si', the Vatican and all Catholics should take the time to read two encyclicals which condemn the same socialism and communism Francis so admires.
"Let's
say together with our heart: no family without a roof, no peasant
farmer without land, no worker without rights, no person without
dignified labour!"
“Land, roof, and work … It’s odd, but for some, if I talk about these [subjects], it turns out the pope is a communist.”
Burger King has long been providing quick meals. Pope Francis has now used it for a quick change.
With hundreds of thousands of Catholic faithful waiting, Pope Francis needed a place to don his vestments to celebrate Mass at the Christ the Redeemer square in Santa Cruz. He had just spent more than 30 minutes in his popemobile waving to thousands lined up on the streets as he drove to the square for the service.
Enter the restaurant known for Whoppers and fries.
The famously unpretentious pope used the fast food joint, which was closed for the morning for the papal visit, before walking to the nearby altar and beginning the Mass.
Alfredo Troche, manager of the Burger King, said the papal entourage approached the restaurant and "asked for help because this was an appropriate place and we had closed" to customers.
Minutes later, during his homily, Francis blasted consumerism. He said that by materialistic logic, everything becomes an object that can be consumed and negotiated.
The company wasted no time in letting the world know of the papal visit. Even before Mass had ended, the restaurant put a post on Facebook thanking the pope "for choosing the BK restaurant as your sacristy."
It also included an advertisement-like image showing the pope beneath a Burger King logo and the words: "There are visits that don't just bring joy to your spirit, but also feed it."
The Burger King advertisement starring Francis.
How humble!
'Have it your way!'
A Whopper!
The god of surprises must have been in town today!
The Communist Russian Talmudic Jewess, Masha Gessen, at a panel discussion for the Sydney Writers Festival in 2012,
"It’s a no-brainer that we should have the right to
marry, but I also think equally that it’s a no-brainer that the
institution of marriage should not exist. …Fighting for gay marriage
generally involves lying about what we are going to do with marriage
when we get there — because we lie that the institution of marriage is
not going to change, and that is a lie."
"The institution of marriage is going to change, and it should change.
And again, I don’t think it should exist. And I don’t like taking part
in creating fictions about my life. That’s sort of not what I had in
mind when I came out thirty years ago."
For those who are gluttons for punishment, the link to the full 50 minute panel discussion.
The Vatican keeps making photos and articles disappear off of their websites. This is the 8th article that Call Me Jorge... is aware of which the Vatican has tried to make vanish. Always these articles and photos are immodest and attempt to stretch the boundaries of the Church's moral teachings. This time it is a 'defense' of marriage which ends up pushing sodomy and lesbianism. The new post-Vatican II teaching from Francis and company (P. Martin Lintner OSM) is that, "sexual behavior is physical communication" and "ecclesiastical sexual morality is in motion." How disgusting and perverted!
Only last year did the same German language, Radio Vatikan, publish an article saying that sodomy didn't need to be healed which had two sodomites kissing while waving the sodomite rainbow flag. This time they have two lesbians kissing while one shows off her sodomy rainbow colored bracelet. The person responsible for Radio Vatikan is surprise, surprise is a Jesuit, like Francis, named Fr. Bernd Hagenkord, S.J. He is the younger of the two men and on the right in this photo.
