(Click images to enlarge.)
Twitter came bearing gifts on Christmas Day.
(Click images to enlarge.)
Twitter came bearing gifts on Christmas Day.
(click images to enlarge)
|Coulombe’s biggest defenders are Feeneyites and self-named trads of the eCarnie circuit.|
The Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary in Richmond, New Hampshire have long been defenders of Charles A. Coulombe. The reasons for this are simple — Coulombe is a Feeneyite, a religious brother of the St. Benedict Center, and CEO of the St. Benedict Center - West.
Below is a recent exchange of tweets between Alistair McFadden and Brother André Marie (the Prior of St. Benedict Center in N.H., real name Louis Villarubia):
Brother André Marie writes, “I don’t know. I have no responsibility for them. I’m not a fan of the gentleman or his weird ideas, but I certainly won’t participate in your campaign of nastiness regarding who sits on the board of directors of a secular corporation.” (Bold is CMJ's for emphasis.)
The “gentleman” Brother André Marie is referring to none other than Stephan A. Hoeller, a freemason theosophist gnostic bishop, and the “secular corporation” he is referring to is the Saint Benedict Center - West.
What does the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary/Saint Benedict Center’s website have to say about the Saint Benedict Center’s West Coast location?
The State of California - Franchise Tax Board recognizes the Saint Benedict Center - West is a religious corporation too.
It should come as little surprise to anyone who has been paying attention, that Brother André Marie refers to the religious corporation of Saint Benedict Center - West as “a secular corporation” as Brother André Marie, the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary in Richmond, New Hampshire and their corresponding Saint Benedict Center were the ones who rehabilitated Coulombe’s image the first time he was busted by the SSPX as a Feeneyite occultist in the 1990s.
|Louis Villarubia — Feeneyite extraordinaire|
Marshall writes that Pope Saint Pius X was Polish!
|Infiltration - Chapter Six|
Yes, he really wrote that.
It’s not something so important that it invalidates, Infiltration: The Plot to Destroy the Church from Within, but it demonstrates once again, the sloppiness and the lack of research in Marshall’s own words of, “The greatest literary accomplishment of my life”.
So where does this tall tale originate from? None other than the flim-flam philanderer, Malachi Martin. It comes from his book, The Keys of This Blood: The Struggle for World Domination Between Pope John Paul II, Mikhail Gorbachev & The Capitalist West, published in 1990. On pages 535 & 536 one reads this lie along with a slew of others.
(click images to enlarge)
|p. 535, The Keys of This Blood|
|p. 536, The Keys of This Blood|
This should come as no surprise as Martin was known for his gift of blarney and tailored his lies to his audience claiming: John XXIII wrote the Christians’ blood-libel & Jews are God prayer; Roman soldiers sodomized Our Lord before crucifying Him; God acts through Kabbalists; that he served as John XXIII’s emissary to Mao Tse-Tung; that a “superforce” surrounded John Paul II and tied his hands; that he was the confessor for John XXIII; God could have incardinated as a cow; Gematria is good when used properly by the rabbis; that two of the Catholic Church’s deficiencies are lack of women and a theology of love; that he was consecrated by Pius XII as a secret bishop; that an integral part of Catholicism is antisemitism; etc... Martin was a master at sowing confusion and misdirection with his juicy tales.
This legend was popularized and spread around the world so much by Martin’s readers, that in 2013 a meeting took place in Opole, Poland on the occasion of the 110th anniversary of Sarto's election as pope and the centenary of his death, which “wanted to prove that there were two popes of Polish origin in history”. This meeting concluded however, “without a shadow of a doubt... Pius X's family came from Italy” and “the hypotheses about Pius X’s Silesian origin should finally be rejected.”
The Pontifical Committee of Historical Sciences in 2016 issued a book, Genealogia dei desideri. Pio X nella memoria del popolo dell'alta Slesia / Genealogia pragnień. Pius X w pamięci ludności Górnego Śląska, on this subject. The English title would be, A Genealogy of wishes/desires. Pius X in memory of the people of Upper Silesia.
|Genealogia dei desideri. Pio X nella memoria del popolo dell'alta Slesia|
Returning to Taylor Marshall and his copy-and-paste book, Infiltration, imagine if he had used a search engine and asked a simple question. He would have come up with something like the following:
Or he would have found this excellent website on Pope St. Pius X which contains the genealogy of the Sarto family all the way back to the 15th century and his parents’ marriage certificate, both of which show what Malachi Martin and Taylor Marshall wrote to be false.
|Genealogy of the Sarto Family going back to the 15th century.|
|Marriage certificate of Pope Saint Pius X’s parents.|
|Cupich in the lead.|
|Mayor Lightfoot was first in line.|
|And the smoking gun.|
Lori Lightfoot the lunatic lesbian Mayor of Chicago and member of the
African Methodist Episcopal Zion Church receives Holy Communion at the
funeral of Officer Ella French as Talmudic Space Cadet Cardinal Blase
Cupich oversees the mess.
clip from - LIVE: Funeral for fallen CPD Officer Ella French
Pope gets a phone call during the Audience. Haven’t seen this before. Then he quickly leaves and says he will be back. pic.twitter.com/npCuPzdnxP— The Catholic Traveler (@MountainButorac) August 11, 2021
Excerpted from: The symbolism of the gifts Francis received and gave while at the Great Synagogue of Rome or Francis’ occult day at the synagogue (6 June 2017).
|Haunted Places in America: A Guide to Spooked and Spooky Public Places in the United States (2004) - Charles A. Coulombe|
Considering that Charles Coulombe: practices tarot card divinization at a theosophical lodge; attends Halloween parties sponsored by the Gnostic Society; likes The Gnostic Society of Los Angeles on social media; enjoys occult movies; channels the Amazing Criswell who he is also obsessed with; rubs shoulders with gnostics socially and gives them lectures on everything but Catholicism; all the while he is a Feeneyite religious brother who has a gnostic bishop serve on the board of the nonprofit corporation he co-founded for his religious order, we should look at Coulombe’s every move with suspicion.
Charles Coulombe wrote a book, Haunted Places in America: A Guide to Spooked and Spooky Public Places in the United States. There are several peculiar items in it such as: the first quote in the book is from a Catholic occultist and the second from an Anglican priest; Coulombe feels “privileged” to go on a “ghost hunt” with psychics and parapsychologists where he uses “divining rods” and to boot he brings along his nephew — Guy; that those who go to haunted places and come away encountering something strange are one of the “lucky” ones; and Coulombe believes that hauntings are caused by souls, demons, or another race of beings. What really sticks out is the dates on which Coulombe wrote the Introduction and the Afterword and how he chose to write them.
In The Satanic Bible by Anton Szandor LaVey (born Howard Stanton Levey) in the section Religious Holidays writes, “After one’s own birthday, the two major Satanic holidays are Walpurgisnacht and Halloween (or All Hallows’ Eve).”
Considering that the Introduction and the Afterword are dated on two of the three major Satanic holidays and the only photo Charles Coulombe has posted of himself celebrating his birthday just happens to be at the [Annie] Besant Lodge, plus his history with the occult and gnostics, we have to conclude that something isn’t right with Coulombe spiritually or morally. How much longer can Coulombe use excuses such as: it was only a coincidence; I was taken out of context; they are haters; or equivocate it away before Catholics wake up?
Birthday in the Lodge
(click images to enlarge)
(pp. 96-98) The Satanic Bible by Anton Szandor LaVey
“Like his edition of the Talmud, The Steinsaltz Tanakh is a work of monumental and prodigious brilliance that took years to complete. Fueled with a lifelong mission to make learning accessible to Jews of all backgrounds, Rabbi Steinsaltz included a treasure trove of information to make the books of Tanakh clear, concise, user friendly, and above all, enticing students to delve even deeper.
Now you can learn Daniel, Ezra and Nehemia with Rabbi Steinsaltz’s clarifications on King David’s verses, including scientific explanations, background notes on flora and fauna, historical information, and much more.”
“Rashi, a rabbi from 11th century France who is highly esteemed by Talmudists as being an elite practitioner of PaRDeS. The technique of PaRDeS “is a rabbinic literary invention, whereby each word of the Torah has four levels of interpretation: the literal meaning, peshat, a more subtle or hinting reading, remez, a creative commentary, drash, and a totally hidden or mysterious meaning, sod.” In other words Rashi was great at nullifying what the Tanakh (Hebrew Bible) says and twisting it through PaRDeS to what the rabbi wanted it to say.”
“The Masoretic text of the Hebrew Bible was consolidated in Tiberias in the 10th century and codified by Aaron Ben Asher... The final stamp of sacred authorization was given to the Masoretic text by Maimonides.”
Bible Studies / The Things That You're Liable to Read in the Bible, Haaretz, (3 April 2011)
More on the White Crucifixion
Maurice Pinay's posts on the White Crucifixion
Angelqueen.org has obtained numerous incriminating documents proving not only that Malachi Martin was indeed the infamous Vatican II “double agent,” but also that his duplicitous activities during the Council ran far deeper than had been previously thought.
During the Second Vatican Council, Martin acted as an assistant and translator to Cardinal Augustin Bea, head of the Secretariat for the Promotion of Christian Unity (SPCU). At the time, a major focus of the SPCU was the Jewish declaration portion of Nostra Aetate, the Vatican II document that addressed the Church’s relations with other religions. Cardinal Bea would later be referred to by Archbishop Lefebvre as an “instrument of betrayal.”
In January of 1966, Look Magazine ran an article entitled “How the Jews Changed Catholic Thinking,” a lengthy, in-depth look at the influence various Jewish lobbying groups had over the final draft of Nostra Aetate. In the article, Senior Editor Joseph Roddy tells of an unnamed Jesuit priest who held a key position in Rome during the time the Second Vatican Council was in session. The priest, described as a “double agent who “could never turn down work” and a “savior in the diaspora,” would use his position to gather and disseminate inside information to the secular press and the Jewish lobbying groups, who would in turn use that information in their efforts to influence the Council fathers – particularly the progressive American bishops. Although the priest’s actual name is withheld, several pseudonyms he used for his various activities are revealed.
As “Michael Serafian,” he wrote “The Pilgrim” (Ferrar, Straus & Giroux, 1964), a tell-all book on the politics, key figures and inner dealings of the council. As “F.E. Cartus,” he penned two timely articles, one for Harper’s Magazine and one for the American Jewish Committee’s influential intellectual periodical “Commentary.” As “Pushkin,” he would feed “inside tips and tactical leaks,” often in the form of notes slipped under doors, to journalists of major media organizations.
This all took place many years before Malachi Martin became a cult figure and public author who wrote books under his own name. Although word began to get around in certain circles that Martin and the pen-names were one in the same, it wasn’t until 5 years after he left Rome, when he wrote “The Encounter” (Ferrar, Straus & Giroux), that the first solid nexus was made between Martin and the double-agent priest. On the back cover of The Encounter, it states clearly that Malachi Martin did indeed write “The Pilgrim” under the pseudonym Michael Serafian.
Despite the indisputable self-admission that Michael Serafian was Martin’s pen name, many of his devoted fans would claim that there was no evidence that he was the mole priest identified in the Look article who wrote for the American Jewish Committee and used his position in Rome to pass sensitive information to the press. What follows, will indisputably show not only that Martin was the double-agent priest in the Look article, but that the “warm friendship with the AJC” described by Joe Roddy was far warmer than anyone, including Roddy, had suspected.
The documents referenced below were made available to AQ by the Manuscripts Department of the New York Public Library. They are part of the Ferrar, Straus & Giroux collection, which contains correspondence and documentation on the publishing company’s dealings with many of its authors. They are available to any and all. None have been altered in any way shape or form.
Exhibit A: Setting up the Swiss bank account – This memo, dated March 19, 1964 was written by FSG treasurer Robert Wohlforth (RW) and sent to Robert Straus (RWS). Roger Straus was the president of Ferrar, Straus and Giroux and the sole heir to the Guggenheim fortune. The memo describes a discussion the two had regarding “The Pilgrim contract” and what steps needed to be taken to set up a Swiss bank account.
Exhibit B: Zachariah Shuster receives royalty payments from Martin’s book, “The Pilgrim” – This extraordinarily fascinating sheet of paper must be colloquially described as the proverbial “doozey.” It’s a Ferrar, Straus and Giroux royalty statement listing payouts and deductions for The Pilgrim. Only instead of the payee being the author of the book, Malachi Martin (aka Michael Serafian), the payee just happens to be Zachariah Shuster of the American Jewish Committee.
Exhibit C: Zachariah Shuster wonders where the check is – Zachariah Shuster of the American Jewish Committee writes a letter to FS&G treasurer wondering why a check that was destined for a Swiss bank account hasn’t yet arrived. He follows up with a confirmation then receives a response from Ferrar, Straus and Giroux treasurer Robert Wohlforth.
Exhibit D: Martin’s services are requested by the AJC – Here we have Marc Tanenbaum, Director of Interreligious Affairs for the AJC, accepting a gracious offer from Roger Straus to use Malachi Martin as he sees fit. Tanenbaum thinks the idea is a good one, stating that “Serafian (Martin) could provide a genuine service if he were to deal with the crucial issue of the deicide problem…” Although the hoped for late summer deadline would not be met, in the January 1965 issue of the AJC publication, Commentary, Martin, as F.E. Cartus, writes an article entitled “Vatican II and the Jews,” At the beginning of the third paragraph, it reads in part as follows:
“Roman Catholic believers drew a whole range of practical conclusions from these premises. The Jews as a people-not only the Jews of Christ’s time but Jews of all time-were guilty of having killed Christ, the God-man: theologically speaking, they were deicides.”
Not only does Martin dutifully write the article (containing a vast amount of insider information) as requested, but he exceeds all expectations when he fabricates a statement on the Jews that he attributes to Pope John XXIII, claiming it was written shortly before his death and was to be read on a set date in all Catholic Churches worldwide. That story HERE.
Also of note is Tanenbaum referring to three ”secret memoranda” submitted by the AJC to Cardinal Bea.
Exhibit E: Robert Straus receives Martin’s assignment from the AJC – Robert Straus acknowledges receiving Tanenbaum’s letter and notes that he simultaneously had received the assignment for “The Pilgrim” to write the article for the AJC publication.
Exhibit F: Roger Straus wants to discuss Martin with Podhorez – Roger Straus wishes to discuss a letter from Michael Serafian (Malachi Martin) with Norman Podhorez, the editor of Commentary – the publication where the article was to appear. It’s unclear what is meant when Straus states they should discuss the matter as a “possible post mortem.” Perhaps he was referring to the fact that the hoped for timeframe of late summer couldn’t be met.
Exhibit G: Straus makes undeniable connection between Martin and F.E. Cartus – Roger Straus writes to a British publisher telling him to look for an article by pseudonym Michael Serafian (Martin) that will appear in the September 1965 issue of Harper’s Magazine. As promised, an article by F.E. Cartus entitled “The Vatican Council Ends – Reform on borrowed time?” by F.E. Cartus appears in the September edition of Harpers.
Exhibit H: An ledger with interesting transactions – A ledger that was created to show “actual payments to or in (sic) behalf of Michael Serafian,” offers some interesting insights. On line 1, it shows the check sent to Zachariah Shuster on June 25, 1964 (see Exhibit C). On line 3, it shows the net royalty payment that is shown on line 29 of the document at Exhibit B. On line 2, it shows another payment to Zachariah Shuster that does not have any corresponding documentation in the FS&G collection. On line 5, it shows a payment of $500 to Abe Karlikow. Abe Karlikow was the director of the American Jewish Committee’s European office, based in Paris, France. On line 9, it shows Martin’s last payment as being on June 7, 1965. Just a few weeks later, on June 24, 1965, Martin would receive a $7,350 (around $48,000 in 2007 dollars) fellowship grant from the Harry F. Guggenheim foundation. The founder of that foundation, Harry Frank Guggenheim, just so happens to be Roger Straus’ uncle on his mother’s side.
There is no doubt whatsoever that the double agent described in the Look article by Joseph Roddy was in fact Malachi Martin. The document at exhibit G undeniably ties Michael Serafian – who is undeniably Malachi Martin – to the F.E Cartus pseudonym.
Joe Roddy was somewhat remiss, in that the relationship between Martin and the American Jewish Committee was far more than “warm friendship.” The relationship was outright collusive. Zachariah Shuster and Abe Kalikow were receiving payments on Martin’s behalf that were laundered through a Swiss bank account set up specifically for that purpose. Marc Tanenbaum requested custom propaganda for the AJC periodical “Commentary,” which Martin happily provided. Shuster and Kalikow were attached to the European office of the AJC in Paris, France, which just so happens to be where Martin fled to after he left Rome.
Martin was paid well for his services. According to the Straus ledger (exhibit H), during the latter half of 1964, he received a total of $3,651.03. According to the Federal Reserve consumer price index calculator, that would equal $24,202.80 today. In the first half of 1965, he received $4,282.85, which works out to $27,940.50 in 2007 dollars. Immediately after receiving his last payment from Straus in June of ’65, Martin receives a grant from Straus’ uncle’s foundation for $7,350 or $47,950 adjusted to 2007. In fairness to Martin, it must be noted that he took that grant in monthly payments over 15 months following the time it was awarded to him. The fact remains however, in the year’s time that spanned from June of ’64 and June of ’65, Martin was paid, granted, or received on his behalf at least $100,000 adjusted for inflation. This sum only includes what has been documented by AQ as being paid from Guggenheim and FS&G from in that one year span. It does not include other payments, if any, from Guggenheim and FS&G that AQ doesn’t have a record of. It does not include any payments Martin would have received for writing the articles for Commentary and Harpers. It does not include any other possible income sources. In the summer of 1963, Robert Kaiser claims that Martin “always had a wallet was stuffed with hundred dollar bills,” that he believed was provided by the AJC. In any case, he most certainly didn’t do the AJC’s bidding for free. It’s more than safe to assume that Martin had income aside from that which AQ has been able to document 40 years after the fact.
While Malachi Martin was supposed to be working on behalf of Holy Mother Church, the Holy See and his brother and sister Catholics, he was working for secular publishers, secular media organization and Jewish interest groups.
For more on Malachi Martin see The Malachi Martin Dossier.